interpretation 1: the US orthodox view (late 1940s-early 1960s)
to the US, it was clear that stalin and the soviet union were to be blamed for the cold war
was the US orthodox view popular?
what is the context for US orthodox view?
quotes for the US orthodox view: for/against
thomas bailey: “a fanatical communist ideology”, “soviets pursue their own world-conquering objectives”
joseph: “in their opinion, american imperialism was the cause of the cold war” -> summarised the soviet view
what was the impact of the US orthodox view?
what were the challenges against the US orthodox view?
soviet viewpoint:
- patriotism: many soviet historians were just as patriotic as the americans, and wanted to defend the rep. of their country especially in the years after WW2
- censorship: soviet historians had to deal with censorship and suspicion. accounts of the war that didn’t follow official lines were at risk of losing their jobs
- lack of sources: soviet historians could not access soviet or US sources
US viewpoint:
- william appleman williams argued that that cold war was instigated by the US and that soviet action was purely defensive
- E.H carr blamed the cold war on US policies
interpretation 2: US revisionist view (mid 1960s-mid 1970s)
what was the context for the US revisionist view?
what was the impact of the US revisionist view?
what were some challenges against the US revisionist view?
quotes for the US revisionist view
what is the post-revisionist view: early 1970s-1989?
john lewis gaddis
- rejected the views of revisionists that the cold war was solely caused by US aggression and expansionism
- he argued that a substantial proportion of the responsibility for the cold war lay with the beliefs and actions of the USSR, and of stalin in particular
- but he also did accept that US policy was based on a misunderstanding and exaggeration of soviet strength and soviet intentions, causing the USSR to overreact
- gaddis didn’t believe that the cold war was inevitable but saw it as a result of fear, confusion and misunderstanding on both sides
what is the context for the post-revisionist view?
what was the impact of the post-revisionist view?
what were the challenges to the post-revisionist view?
what was the interpretations of the new cold war historians (1989 onwards)
what is the context of the view of the new cold war historians?
what is the impact of the view of the new cold war historians?