Forest Lost in the UK
Forest cover of UK reduced from 90% to 10% by end of 19th century.
But now 13% of the UK’s land is now forested
Less emphasis on timber production and more on planting fast growing confers such as Stika spruce.
climate regulation
Climate regulation:
loss of livelihoods
Loss of Livelihoods:
water cycle disruption
Water Cycle Disruption:
wildfires
Wildfires:
forest loss - different across locations
China
Forests Loss – different locations:
o China’s Grain for Green programme – restoring forests to prevent soil erosion and desertification.
§ 2015 forest cover = 22.2% of China’s territory which was up from 16.4% in 1990.
§ Set the target to achieve forest cover 30% of its land by 2050.
§ Planting more than 4M hectares of forest every year.
forest loss - different across locations
UK
o UK forest cover increase:
§ Reduced from 90% to 105 by end of 19th century.
§ But now 13% of land us now forested.
why the Kuznet curve cannot be universally applied
o Early development: during economic growth, forest loss initially high.
o Later development: after certain level of income, rising wealth + education means stronger environmental protection laws and consumer pressure.
o May result in stabilization or recovery of environmental quality.
o DRC = LIDC, containing 2nd largest tropical rainforest.
o Deforestation has continued for logging for timber exports, fuelwood collection for heating and cooking and a weak government that lacks enforcement on environmental protection laws.
o Long term damage without turning point -> country remains heavily reliant on forest resoruces and poverty drives this exploitation. Unlike EDC’s that fololow the EKC and eventually invest in environment recovery, LIC’s lack financial or institutional capacity to reverse damage.
Thus, EKC does not apply everywhere.
What does the Kuznet curve say?