I think Mrs Birling ought to be excused
she’s had a long, exciting and tiring day
patronising
seeks to assert his patriarchal influence by speaking on Sheila’s behalf and suppressing her voice
sinister undertone of controlling what she thinks and her body
- foreshadows subsequent revelations about Gerald’s pernicious interactions with Eva
you think young women ought to be protected against unpleasant and disturbing things?
Edwardian view
class hypocrisy - upper class are to be sheltered from harsh realities of life whereas working-class woman aren't
I must obviously be a selfish, vindictive creature
aware of how badly she behaved
- self-deprecating sarcasm
mature and perceptive enough to forecast Gerald’s thoughts
we’ll have to share our guilt
Priestley’s beliefs embodies in the inspector
we all started like that - so confident, so pleased with ourselves
outspoken, confident and insightful
beings to challenge her parents
speaks slower(dashes and commas) - adopts inspectors structure
you seem to have made such a great impression on this child
treats Sheila as immature and young
disdainful and dismissive of her opinion
we often do on the young ones. They’re more impressionable
Priestley’s message that the younger generations have the capacity to change and break the cycle of abuse and poverty
- more open minded
generation gap
I think you ought to go to bed - and forget about this absurd business
trying to control Sheila
business
Girls of that class
clear prejudice
only cares about Eva’s class
you musn’t try to build up a kind of wall between us and that girl
metaphor
change in tone
-language has changed from being one of accepting her father’s reprimands to telling her parents what to do
metaphor
that - I consider - is a trifle impertinent
haughty and snobbish
sees inspector as socially inferior
- shouldn’t be able to contradict her
he’s giving us the rope - so that we’ll hang ourselves
metaphor
interpretation
- rich will cause their ultimate downfall in the form of a social revolution
She was very pretty - soft brown hair and big dark eyes - (breaks off). My God!
shows the greatest grief when remembering her beauty
‘“No, of course not. He’s only a boy… (staggered) It isn’t true”
ignorance and shock
- blind to the reality of her families problems
associates a face with the man she believed to be culpable, and because it is someone she cares about and believes to be equal in status to herself, Mrs Birling begins to feel the weight of what she has done
As if a girl of that sort would refuse money
preconceptions about lower class
I blame the young man who was the father of the child she was going to have
He should be made an example of. If the girl’s death is due to anybody, then it’s due to him
very ironic
lack of attentiveness and her ability to turn a blind eye to Eric’s behaviour has led to her condemning her own son through ignorance and ego
She was claiming elaborate fine feelings and scruples that were simply absurd in a girl in her position
“I’m sorry she should have come to such a horrible end. But I accept no blame for it at all.”
antithesis of what J.B. Priestley is attempting to expound via the play.
Eva was the victim of a society where she had to struggle to survive and suffered.
Mrs Birling’s comments are cruel and reflect a lack of pity for Eva’s suffering
I didn’t install her there to make love to her
Gerald did provide for Eva, care for her and left her with money and supplies
I became at once the most important person in her life
Rescue imagery
Gerald’s rescue of Eva is a façade
condemns the actions of “alderman Meggarty” who is a “notorious womaniser”
- Gerald was in a very similair position
you were the wonderful fairy prince
witty quips
- sarcasm
I don’t dislike you as I did half an hour ago
And now at least you’ve been honest
shows how much she has changed
But just in case you forget - or decide not to come back, Gerald, I think you’d better rake this with you(She hands him the ring)
ring
symbolic of her conversion from socialism to capitalism
you and I aren’t the same people who sat down to dinner here”
Sheila has accepted her change
Priestley suggests that the relationship is completely fragmented
- ‘you and I’ rather than ‘we’ implying that their unity has been broken