Uses and gratification theory
Assumptions (5) Author Tradition context key concepts(3) critic (3) Example
Author: Katz blumle and gurevict Tradition: Socio-cultural Context: mass/media Key concepts: - NEEDS (5) DPPSS diversion personal identity, personal relationship, surveillance, social - phones internet social media - mediums for different needs.
Critic: heurictic: more framework. Utility: not explaining anything. Unconscioness. Logical consistency: media(functional) / sloppy. Audience need arise from media.
EX: friday night. Use to show “a perfect picture of yourself”
Structuration theory
Assumptions (3) Author Tradition(2) context (2) key concepts(ca. 9) critic (2) Example
Author: Giddens
Tradition: Sociocultural, Cybernetic.
context: small group and organ
Key concepts: rules, resources. Reflexivity Discursive/practical counsciouness. Agent agency. Blueprint implicit explitit. Authoritative resource. RCRLE power. time and space
Scope: broad with use of both resource, power councioness. Parsimony: many concepts and not easily read.
Example: Own workplace.
Media ecology:
Assumptions (3) Author Tradition context key concepts(5) critic (2) Example
Author: Mcluhan
Tradition: sociocultural, critical context: mass/media
Key concepts: global village, ERAS: tribal, literal, print, electronic, medium is the message. Hot and cold. Laws of media(technology impact) Enhancement Obsolecence Retrival Reversal
Heuristic; entuniasme, resonate
Testability: hard to test concepts, but we can in the world how addicted and affected we are about technology and medias. If globalize use.
EX: Companies carefull with media use on facebook ect. huge effect.
communication accommodation theory
Assumptions (4) Author Tradition context key concepts(7) critic (2) Example
1- Communication have similarities and dissimilarities.
2- People evaluate communication based on their perception of behavior and talk
3- People show social status and group belonging with language and behavior.
4- The degree of accommodation differs
Author: Giles.
Tradition: social-phycological
context: cultural
Key concepts: (Un-) or consciously. Divergence. Convergence. Overaccommondation – sensory dependency, intergroup.
Scope(broad with com), logical consistency(need middleroad between d and C) heurism(highly)
EX: Hilary: accent to southern
Organizational culture theory
Assumptions (3) Author Tradition context key concepts(3) (11) critic (2) Example
Authors: pakarowsky and O’donnald Thujillo.
The tradition is social-cultural and the context is organizational.
key concepts: Web. Symbols Psy Verba Behave. Performance. Ritual(everyday) Passion(stories in) social(politeness) poli(behavior control), encultur(achieve knowledge and skills)
Critic: utility: performance symbols easily related. Heuristic work situation
EX Work.
Organizational information theory
Assumptions (3) Author Tradition context key concepts(4) critic (3) Example
author is Wick,
traditions is cybernetic
context is organixational.
key concepts: DARWIN, rules for information reduction(4). Cycles. Process: ESR Enactment, selection, retention
heurictic. Logical consisten: intuition(unconscious) Utility: unravel complex
EX: law about new app at work
Semiotic
Author
key concepts(6)
Example
Study of sign
Author: sausurre
Key concepts: Sign(signifier(sound image) signified(concept)) Interpretant. Signs types: Symbolic index iconic.
Denotation connotation. Anchoring relay trick effect.
Commercial: Use semiotic to achieve goals, communicate identity values. (signs are good and bad? beer with champagne)
Face negotiation theory
Assumptions Author Tradition context key concepts critic Example
author: ting-toomey
tradition: social-psycological
context: culture.
key concepts: face face work(TSA) self-identity. negative positive face. Fave saving/restoration (methods culture conflict DICOA)
Critic: logical consistency: minus all culture difference. Heuristic.
Symbolic interaction theory
Assumptions (3) Author Tradition context key concepts(6) critic (3) Example
Author: Mead and blume
Tradition: semotic phenomenological
context: intre inter.
Key concepts: mind self society – self: self fulfilling prophecy looking glass self, pygmalia effect(live up or down to peoples expectations (test high IQ)
Scope: broad framework
Testability: nominel
Utility: mostly individual
Media Agenda setting
Assumptions (3) Author Tradition context key concepts(10) critic (2) Example framing
5 overall
Author: Mccomb’s and shaw
Tradition: Socio-psycological
Context: mass/media
Key concepts: media gatekeeping, priming, media framing, Media vs source(power?), Media affect only if emotional or need, The attribute agenda setting, surveillance, correlation(most important?), intermedia, pack journalism
Scope: broad attribute agenda
Utility: still, even if people: active/web search
Framing: different papers put different focus. Drugs: bad for society. vs. treatment centers to help them.
Cultural studies
Assumptions (2) Author Tradition context key concepts(7) critic (3) Example
media is controlled by the corporations (the elite) in the intention of making money
Author: Stuart hall
Tradition: critical
Context is Mass/media
Key concepts: Hegemony - counter hegemony - Decode positions: dominant, negotiated, oppositional. False consciones - Alienation - cultural wars - media impact(invade living space, shape taste, persuade)
Utility: some extent: lower class - new theories from this
logical consistency: counter hegemony
Heuristic
EX: American dream. Vote(observe/A). black white/women rights
Rhetoric
Assumptions (2) Author Tradition context key concepts(3) critic (3) Example
Key concepts: Genres FED, syllogism, canons IASDM
Critic: Heuristic: high – test of time: the best. Logical consistency: not acknowledge feedback
EX?
Audience
Key concepts
Author: Mcquils
key concepts: 4 types of audience: social/public groups + gratification set + medium + channel/content
Different views: Mass(precise message) /market(brand)/group(interplay perspectives)
Social penetration theory
Assumptions (4) Author Tradition context key concepts(7) critic (2) Example
Key concepts: penetration process OEAS self-disclosure. Onion breath depth. Intimacy PIE. Reciprocity. Depenetration and dissolve.
Scope: narrow dont covering al relationships.
Heuristic relationship
EX: Own dating life
Uncertainty reduction theory
Assumptions (5) Author Tradition context key concepts(9) critic (3) Example
Author: Berger and calabresa
Tradition: social-psycological
Context: intra inter.
key concepts: Information seeking. Process with 3 stages: Entry personal and exit. Reward/cost ratio. Self-disclosure. Covering law. Uncertainty Vs. concept. Reduce: passiv, active, interactive. Behavioral/cognitive
Critic: scope: bit broad
Utitlity: axiums. Uncertainty need before reward balance, need
Heuristic
EX: mulan. Target group
Expectancy violation theory
Assumptions (3) Author Tradition context key concepts(9) critic (3) Example
author: burgoon
Tradition and context: sociopsycological intra/inter - investigate relationship
Key concepts: Violation valance: meaning + positive/negative. - Arousal. - threat theshold high/low - reward valance - expectations because: relational, individual, context RIC. Proximal and Into, pers, social, publ, IPSP - Primary secondary and public
Critic: scope: broad but clear proximic
Utility: relevant all conversation
Heuristic: yes.
EX: norm expectancies online e.g. facebook
commercials test limits: intel Racist. Playstation white: dominate black.
Cordinating management of meaning
Assumptions (3) Author Tradition context key concepts(7) critic (3) Example
co-create meaning with rules and coordination.
Author: pierce and cronen
traditions: phenomenomenal, cybernetic and social cultural.
Context: interpersonal intrapersonal.
key concepts: Social reality(past experience: shared reality). hierarchy of meanings: Cultural pattern/life scripts/relationship(potentials)/episodes/Speech act(intention)/content(raw-meaning)
loop(reflect back) / charmed loop (same stronger?)
/ Stange loop ( meaning change-therapy, alco)
RULES: constitutive(behavior interpret context vs. regular rules(guidelines -how to behave)
- agree compromise not agree
- repetitive pattern
others shoes to understand hierarchy of theirs.
Scope: broad
Parsimony: yes hierarchy of meaning
heuristic - adoption
Lineær interactional transactional
key concepts: 6
One Way model
Sender, Channel with noise, receiver
Two way process
Sender - noise - field of experience - receiver - feedback (not simultaneously)
We are both sender and receiver - happen simultaneously - each have individual and shared field of experience(experiences and symbols e.g.) + noise
Field of experience: cultural background, location, travel distance for message and personal experiences
Semantic noise(slang), psysical noise(blind)Psycological(attitude) Physiological(need hungry)
ectics