Author
Janis
Tradition(2)
Socio-psychological and socio-cultural
Context(2)
Small group, organizational
approach to knowing
Positivist/emperical
Overall theory
High cohesive groups(group over individual opinion) fail to consider alternatives. When group members think alike, they tend to avoid sharing unpopular or dissimilar ideas even though it may be a better option to maintain a group identity
affiliative constraints
when members withhold their input rather than face rejection from the group
why groups, because group work is complex
two heads are better than one - groups are better problem solvers.
Group think in a work place
mission, vision, values
problem-solving groupwhose
main task is to make decisions and provide policy recommendations.
task-oriented groups
main goal is to work towards completing jobs assigned to them.
goup desicision are complex because?
Different ages, competitive nature, size of group, leaderships style, cultural background and who to have which roles
first conditions promoting groupthink - Cohesiveness
lead to positive feelings. A cultural value that places emphasis on the group over the individual. “Cohesiveness is the degree of mutual interest among [group] members
second conditions promoting groupthink - Specific structural characteristics of the environment in which the group functions (4)
1) Group insulation: group unaffected by outside world, even if it would b relevant or not, help or not.
2) A lack of impartial leadership: led by people who put their personal agendas first.
3) Lack of decision making procedures. Failure to provide norms for solving group issues.
4) Homogeneity of member’s background: Without diversity of background and experience, it may be difficult to debate critical issues.
last conditions promoting groupthink - Stressful internal and external characteristics of the situation
internat/external
internal: just do what the first the best said (leader maybe) -do as the group does, or we don’t like you.
external: stick together against something…
symptoms of groupthink
prevent group talk
whistle-blowing: report unethical or illegal behavior to others
conscientious objectors: group member who refuse to participate because it would violate personal conscious.
Critic - scope
defined only to decision maker groups, so could be defined as narrow, even though it has been used in different group types
Critic - testability
hard to test because some concept are not well-defined and the symptoms are not all with groupthink
critic - heurism
used in various fields e.g about studentkilling abuse cover up …
Critic - test of time
still get a great deal of attention, and still a relevant subject to investigate.
other personal
Relevant because i think group think can easily happen in stressed environments were the goal is to fit in or to survive(have a good time as possible) Like the movie the wave, an experiment about how people get convents that this cult is the place to be, and there is punishment for the people who dont join and support it. Its to replicate what happen in nazi times with hitler. Show that it can somehow easily happen again.
Research methodology - too individual.
elevator