Nature of Indian Constitution
Neither fully rigid nor fully flexible; a synthesis of both.
Need for Amendment
To adjust to changing needs and conditions like any written constitution.
Article 368
Provides Parliament’s power and procedure to amend the Constitution.
Constituent Power
Parliament amends the Constitution in exercise of ‘constituent power’ not ordinary legislative power.
Basic Structure Doctrine
Parliament cannot amend Basic Structure; established in Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973).
Initiation of Amendment Bill
Only in Parliament; cannot be introduced in state legislatures.
Who Can Introduce Bill
A minister or a private member; no prior permission of the President required.
Special Majority Required
Majority of total membership + two-thirds of members present & voting.
Separate Passage Condition
Each House must pass the bill separately; no joint sitting allowed.
State Ratification Requirement
Needed only for federal provisions; consent of half of state legislatures.
President’s Role
President must give assent; cannot withhold or return the bill.
Effect After Assent
Bill becomes a Constitutional Amendment Act; Constitution stands amended.
Three Methods of Amendment
(1) Simple Majority, (2) Special Majority, (3) Special Majority + State Ratification.
Simple Majority Amendments
Used for: Admission/establishment of new states; alteration of state boundaries; creation/abolition of Legislative Councils; Second Schedule; Parliamentary privileges; quorum; salaries; citizenship; UTs; Fifth & Sixth Schedules.
Special Majority Amendments
Used for Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles, and all provisions not under simple majority or requiring state ratification.
Special Majority + State Consent Amendments
Used for federal provisions: Election of President; executive power distribution; SC & HCs; Legislative relations; Seventh Schedule; GST Council; Representation of states in Parliament; Article 368 itself.
No Time Limit for State Ratification
States may approve anytime; Constitution is silent on withdrawal of ratification.
Criticism 1: No Separate Body
No Constitutional Convention; amendment power only with Parliament.
Criticism 2: States Can’t Initiate Amendment
Unlike USA; except in case of Legislative Councils creation/abolition.
Criticism 3: Limited State Role
Most amendments need only Parliament’s approval; fewer require state consent.
Criticism 4: Unclear Ratification Rules
No time limit; no clarity on withdrawal of consent.
Criticism 5: No Joint Sitting Provision
If Houses disagree, bill fails; unlike ordinary bills where joint sitting is allowed.
Criticism 6: Similar to Legislative Process
Except for special majority, process resembles ordinary law-making.
Criticism 7: Vague Provisions
Sketchy procedure leads to heavy judicial interpretation.