features of anorexia
restrictive type
binge eating and purging type
symptoms of anorexia
Criteria A - (all about losing weight)
Criteria B - (all about maintaining weight)
Criteria C
biological explanation for anorexia
Genetics:
zeeland et al 2013: specific gene linked to disorder
- he compared 152 different genes in women with and without anorexia and found significant differences between EPHX2 gene
EPHX2 = enzyme that metabolises cholesterol suggesting that the disorder may be caused by a disruption in how the body processes cholesterol
difference between concordance rates and heritability estimate
concordance rates is the probability that individuals will both have certain characteristics given that one has it
heritability estimate is the similarity between family members or twins that is due to genes
family studies
Kipman et al 1999
- increased risk of AN on female relatives of someone who has the disorder than controls which supports genetic theory
twin studies
Kipman 1999
biological explanation evaluation
pros
- supporting evidence from Kipmann
cons
non- biological theory
sociocultural theory = contributions society makes to individual development. Suggests that learning is a social process
Garner and Garfinkel 1980 - ‘slim is beautiful’ they found AN more common in dancer and model students because the social setting reflects in them having AN (slimmer physique required to do well)
Rackoff and Hoing 2006 - female athlete triad. Female may attempt to enhance performance by altering diet/ over exercising which can lead to amenorrhea, low bone density, disordered eating
Thompson and Johnson - looked at miss americas beauty across 20 years and found the average weight of contestants were decreasing but average weight of normal women were increasing. Suggests that the body type being celebrated as ideal was far from reality which makes women see themselves as fat
Garner et al 1980 - 10 year span and found that diet articles in magazines were increasing which suggests that society and culture has predisposition to the idea that slim is beautiful
evaluation of the non-biological explanation of anorexia
Pros
Cons
treatments of anorexia (intro CBT)
enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy
stages of CBT
Stage 1: 4 weeks, 2 per week
Stage 2: 2 appointments, 1 week apart
- discuss progress being made in stage 1 and talk about how patient is currently doing
Good progress = praise to increase motivation
Bad progress = identify things that aren’t going well
Stage 3: 8 appointments, once a week
Stage 4: 3 appointments 2 weeks apart
evaluation for CBT
pros
- pike et al 2003: out of 33 patients the relapse rate of those receiving CBT-E was lower than nutritional counselling
cons
treatments for anorexia (drug therapy)
SSRI’s
Olanzapine
evaluation for drug therapy
Pros
Cons