Attachment Flashcards

(124 cards)

1
Q

What does attachment look like?

A
  • Close proximity to primary caregiver
  • Separation distress
  • Stranger anxiety
  • Secure-base behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Two features of caregiver-infant interaction

A
  • Interactional synchrony
  • Reciprocity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What’s interactional synchrony?

A
  • Infants move their bodies in time with the rhythm of carers’ spoken language to sustain communication
  • They mirror each other in terms of facial and body movements
  • Important for the development of mother-infant attachment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What’s reciprocity?

A
  • Each person responds to the other’s signal and elicits a response
  • Interaction is mutual
  • Strengthens attachment bond
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What’s bodily contact?

A
  • Physical interactions between carer and infant help form the attachment bond
  • Especially in the period immediately after birth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What’s caregiverese/motherese?

A
  • Adults who interact with infants use a modified form of vocal language
  • High-pitched, song-like, slow, and repetitive
  • Aids communication between carer and infant
  • Strengthens attachment bond
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Caregiver-infant interactions strength - controlled observations

A
  • Mother and infant are filmed from multiple angles, capturing fine detail
  • Babies don’t know or care that they’re being observed so their behaviour doesn’t change
  • Research therefore has high validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Caregiver-infant interactions strength - Klaus and Kennell (1976)

A
  • Compared mums who had extended physical contact with their babies with mums who only had physical contact during feeding in the three days after birth
  • One month later, the mums with the greater physical contact were found to cuddle their babies more and made greater eye contact
  • These effects were still noticeable one year later
  • This suggests that greater physical contact leads to stronger and closer bond formation
  • Practical application - hospitals placed mothers and babies in the same room in the days following birth to encourage the formation of attachments
  • Stronger attachments will hopefully lead to stronger relationships in the future
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Caregiver-infant interactions weakness - It’s hard to know what’s happening when observing infants

A
  • What’s being observed is merely hand movements or changes in expression
  • It’s difficult to be certain of what’s actually taking place from the infant’s perspective
  • As babies can’t communicate, inferences must be drawn
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Caregiver-infant interactions weakness- socially sensitive research and economic implications

A
  • Research into mother-infant interaction suggests that children may be disadvantaged by particular child-rearing practices
  • Mothers who return to work shortly after a child is born restricts the opportunities for achieving interactional synchrony
  • The suggestion that mothers shouldn’t return to work too soon has socially sensitive implications
  • Mothers delaying their return could also have economic implications
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Difficulties encountered when trying to investigate caregiver-infant interaction and how they might be addressed

A
  • Context affecting behaviour - research could take place in a natural setting
  • Observational bias - use more than one observer and compare results
  • Babies have limited waking periods - have shorter observation periods
  • Ethics - protection from harm, confidentiality, right to withdraw
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Stages of attachment (Schaffer) - Aim

A
  • To investigate the process of how early developments formed
  • To investigate whether there was a distinct pattern of formation, common to all infants
  • To identify and describe the distinct stages by which attachments form
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Stages of attachment (Schaffer) - Method

A
  • Longitudinal study
  • 60 new-born babies from working-class area of Glasgow
  • Babies and mothers visited at home every month for the first year and again at 18 months
  • Observations and interviews were conducted
  • Questions asked about whom infants smiled at, whom they responded to, who caused them distress, etc
  • Attachment was measured in two ways:
    Separation protest - assessed through several everyday situations e.g. infant left alone in room, infant left alone with others, infant left in cot at night
    Stranger anxiety - assessed by the researcher starting each home visit by approaching the infant to see if this distressed them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Stages of attachment (Schaffer) - Findings

A
  • Most infants started to show separation protest when parted from their attachment figure between 6-8 months
  • Stranger anxiety was shown about a month later
  • Strongly attached infants had mothers who responded to their needs quickly and gave more opportunities for interaction
  • Weakly attached infants had mothers who responded less quickly and gave fewer opportunities for interaction
  • Most infants went on to develop multiple attachments. At 18 months, 87% had at least two attachments
  • Attachments to different people were of a similar nature - infants behaving in a similar way to different attachment figures
  • 39% of infants’ prime attachment was not the main carer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Stages of attachment (Schaffer) - Conclusions

A
  • There’s a pattern of attachment formation common to all infants, suggesting that the process is biologically controlled
  • Attachments are more easily made with those who display ‘sensitive responsiveness’, rather than those spending the most time with a child
  • Multiple attachments are the norm and of similar quality
  • Opposes Bowlby’s idea that attachments are a hierarchy - one prime attachment and the other minor ones
  • Schaffer commented that there is nothing to suggest mothering can’t be shared by several people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Schaffer and Emerson weakness - Generalisability

A
  • Sample size of 60 babies and carers
  • All families were from the same district and social class in the same city at a time over 50 years ago
  • Child-rearing practices vary from one culture to another and one historic period to another
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Schaffer and Emerson strength - Validity

A
  • The study had mundane realism - it was conducted under everyday conditions, in the families’ own homes, doing ordinary activities
  • Behaviour of the babies was unlikely to be affected by the presence of observers
  • High external validity
  • Study was carried out longitudinally - the same children were observed
  • High internal validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are the four stages of attachment?

A
  • Stage 1 - Pre-attachment (asocial) stage
  • Stage 2 - Indiscriminate attachment
  • Stage 3 - Specific attachment
  • Stage 4 - Multiple attachment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What’s pre-attachment (stage 1)?

A
  • 0-3 months
  • Baby learns to separate people from objects
  • From 6 weeks, infants become attracted to other humans, preferring them to objects
  • This is demonstrated by them smiling at people’s faces
  • Baby doesn’t have any strong preferences about who cares for them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What’s indiscriminate attachment (stage 2)?

A
  • 3-7/8 months
  • Babies display more observable social behaviour
  • Begin to discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar people
  • Smiling more at known people
  • Babies usually still accept cuddles and comfort from any adult
  • Don’t usually show separation anxiety or stranger anxiety
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What’s specific attachment (stage 3)?

A
  • 7/8 months onwards
  • Infants stay close to particular people, becoming distressed when separated from them and happy when they return
  • Avoid unfamiliar people
  • Specific person is the primary attachment figure
  • Not necessarily the person the child spends the most time with
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What’s multiple attachment (stage 4)?

A
  • 9 months onwards
  • Infant extends attachment behaviour to other adults who they regularly spend time with
  • These are called secondary attachments
  • Some attachments may be stronger than others and can have different functions
  • No limit to number of attachments
  • Fear of strangers weakens
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Stages of attachment weakness - Problem studying the asocial stage

A
  • At this age, babies have poor coordination and are immobile
  • Difficult to make judgements based on observation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Stages of attachment weakness - Measuring multiple attachment

A
  • Children have playmates as well as attachment figures which may lead to distress if they leave
  • This doesn’t signify attachment
  • We can’t distinguish between behaviour shown towards secondary attachment figures and playmates
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Stages of attachment weakness - Carpenter (1975)
- Presented infants with familiar and unfamiliar voices and faces - Found that two week old babies looked at a face longest when it was the mother's accompanied by her voice - They were distressed when it was the mother's face with a different voice - Suggests babies can recognise and are attracted to their mothers from an early age
26
The role of the father
- Men now have a much bigger role in parenting than before - Bowlby believed that children have one primary attachment figure - usually the mother but it could be the father - Many researchers have seen the fathers role as less of a caregiver and more of a playmate - There is some evidence to suggest when fathers do take on the role of the main caregiver, they adopt behaviours more typical of mothers
27
The role of the father - Schaffer and Emerson (1964)
- Found that the majority of babies did become attached to their mother first (around 7 months) - A few weeks or months after, they formed secondary attachments to other family members, including the father - In 75% of infants, an attachment was formed with the father by 18 months - this was shown as the infants protested when their fathers walked away
28
factors that affect the relationship between fathers and children
degree of sensitivity - more secure attachments found when fathers show more sensitivity to children's needs marital intimacy - the degree of intimacy a father has within his relationship affects the type of attachment he will have with his children supportive co-parenting - the amount of support a father gives to his partner in helping to care for their children
29
role of the father - why don't fathers generally become primary attachments?
- this could be the result of traditional gender roles - women are expected to be more caring and nurturing - it could be that female hormones create higher levels of nurturing and therefore women are biologically pre-disposed to be the primary attachment figure - breast feeding
30
role of the father strength - Grossman (2002)
- found that fathers as secondary attachment figures had an important role in their children's development - he found the quality of the father's play was related to the quality of adolescent attachments - this suggests that fathers have a different role in attachment - play rather than nurturing
31
role of the father strength - growing up without a father
- children who grow up without fathers have often been seen to do less well at school and have higher levels of risk taking and aggression - this suggests that fathers can help prevent negative developmental outcomes - however, most studies have focused on single mothers from poor socio-economic backgrounds - it may therefore be social factors related to poverty that produce these outcomes, not the absence of a father
32
role of the father strength - important for mothers
- supportive fathers provide mothers with time away from children - this can help reduce stress and ultimately improve the quality of a mother's relationship with her children
33
role of the father weakness - inconsistent findings
- some researchers are interested in understanding the role fathers have as secondary attachment figures - other researchers are concerned with the father as a primary attachment figure - this is a problem because psychologists cannot simply answer 'what is the role of the father?'
34
animal studies of attachment
- Lorenz and Harlow - animal studied are carried out for either ethical or practical reasons - researchers have been interested in the relationship between infant animals and their mothers - their observations informed psychologists' understanding of mother-infant attachment in humans
35
Lorenz (1935) - aim
to investigate the mechanisms of imprinting where the youngsters follow and form an attachment to the first large moving object that they meet
36
Lorenz (1935) - procedure
- Lorenz (1935) split goose eggs into two batches - one batch was hatched naturally by the mother (control group) and the other batch was hatched in an incubator (experimental group) with Lorenz making sure he was the first moving object that they encountered - Lorenz recorded their behaviour - he then placed each batch under an upturned box and recorded their behaviour once the box was removed
37
Lorenz (1935) - findings
- immediately after birth, the naturally hatched goslings followed their mother, while the incubated goslings followed Lorenz - when the box was removed, the naturally hatched goslings went straight to their mother, while the incubated goslings went to Lorenz, showing no bond with their mother - Lorenz also noted how imprinting would only occur within a set time period (between 4 and 25 hours after hatching)
38
Lorenz (1935) - what's imprinting?
a form of attachment where bird species that are mobile from birth attach to and follow the first moving object they see
39
Lorenz (1935) - what's the critical period?
- the period in which imprinting needs to take place - between 4 and 25 hours
40
Lorenz (1935) - sexual imprinting
Lorenz observed that birds which imprinted on a human would often, as adult birds, attempt to mate with humans
41
Lorenz (1935) weakness - generalisability to humans
- the human attachment system is different from birds - therefore, the findings can't be generalised to humans
42
Lorenz (1935) weakness - Guiton et al (1966)
- found that chickens that imprinted on washing up gloves would try to mate with them as adults - however, they eventually learned to mate with other chickens - this suggests that the impact of imprinting on mating behaviour isn't permanent
43
Lorenz (1935) weakness - reliability
- other researchers have suggested that the critical period wasn't as fixed as Lorenz suggested - ducklings that were kept in isolation were able to imprint after the suggested critical period - others have also suggested that imprinting is reversible
44
Harlow (1959) - aim
to test learning theory by comparing attachment behaviour in baby monkeys given a wire surrogate mother producing milk with those given a soft towelling mother producing no milk
45
Harlow (1959) - procedure
- two types of surrogate mothers were constructed - a wire mother and a towelled mother - sixteen baby monkeys were used, four in each of four conditions: a wire mother producing milk and a towelled mother producing no milk, a wire mother producing no milk and a towelled mother producing milk, a wire mother producing milk, a towelled mother producing milk - the amount of time spend with each mother was recorded - monkeys were frightened with a loud noise to test for mother preference during stress - a larger cage was also used to test the monkey's degree of exploration
46
Harlow (1959) - findings
- monkeys preferred contact with the towelled mother, regardless of whether she produced milk - monkeys with only a wire mother had diarrhoea - when frightened by a loud noise, monkeys clung to the towelled mother - in the large cage conditions, monkeys with a towelled mother explored more and visited their mother more often
47
Harlow (1959) - conclusions
- rhesus monkeys have an innate need for contact comfort - suggests attachment concerns emotional security more than food
48
Harlow (1959) - critical period
- a mother figure had to be introduced to an infant monkey within 90 days for an attachment to form - after this time, attachment was impossible and the damage done by early deprivation was irreversible
49
Harlow (1959) - maternally deprived monkeys as adults
- Harlow followed the monkeys who has been deprived of a mother into adulthood - the monkeys reared with wire mothers were the most dysfunctional - even those reared with a soft toy didn't develop normal behaviour - more aggressive, less sociable, bred less often, unskilled at mating - as mothers, some of the deprived monkeys neglected, attacked, and even killed their children
50
Harlow (1959) strength - theoretical value
- Harlow's findings have had a profound effect on psychologists' understanding of human mother-infant attachment - Harlow showed that attachment doesn't develop as a result of being fed, but from contact comfort - Harlow also showed us the importance of early relationships for later social development
51
Harlow (1959) strength - practical value
- helped social workers understand risk factors in child neglect and abuse, and has allowed intervention to help it - these findings are also important in the care of captive monkeys
52
Harlow (1959) weakness - generalisability to humans
- although monkeys are more similar to humans than geese, they're not human - there may be other factors involved in the attachments of humans
53
Harlow (1959) weakness - ethical issues
- the monkeys suffered as a result of Harlow's procedures - Harlow was well aware of the suffering he caused - he referred to the wire mothers as 'iron maidens' after a medieval torture device
54
Ainsworth's strange situation (1969)
- aim was to be able to observe key attachment behaviours as a means of assessing the quality of a child's attachment to a caregiver - assessed 106 infants aged 9-18 months - every aspect of behaviour was observed and videotaped - testing room was unfamiliar - every 15 seconds, the category of behaviour displayed was recorded and scored on intensity (1-7)
55
Ainsworth's strange situation (1969) - procedure
- controlled observation (laboratory) with a two-way mirror - designed to measure the security of attachment a child displays towards a caregiver
55
Ainsworth's strange situation (1969) - behaviours used to judge attachment
- proximity seeking - exploration and secure-base behaviour - stranger anxiety - separation anxiety - response at reunion
56
Ainsworth's strange situation (1969) - procedure
- 8 episodes lasting 3 minutes each - each episode had different people present, varying between the mother, infant, stranger, and observer - each episode had a different situation e.g. in episode 4, the mother leaves the child and stranger together
57
Ainsworth's strange situation (1969) - findings
- Ainsworth identified three main types of attachment - these were insecure avoidant (Type A), securely attached (Type B), and insecure resistant (Type C)
58
what's insecure-avoidant attachment (Type A)?
- high levels of independence - children explore freely but don't seek proximity or show secure-base behaviour - low levels of separation anxiety - low levels of stranger anxiety - very little response at reunion - 20-25% of toddlers are classed as insecure-avoidant
59
what's secure attachment (Type B)?
- the most desirable attachment type - proximity and secure base behaviour - explore happily but regularly go back to the caregiver - show moderate stranger and separation anxiety - joy at reunion - caregivers are sensitive to infant's needs - 60-75% of British toddlers are classed as secure
60
what's insecure-resistant attachment (Type C)?
- children seek greater proximity than others and so explore less - show high stranger and separation anxiety - resist comfort when reunited with caregiver - 3% of British toddlers are classed as insecure-resistant
61
Ainsworth's strange situation (1969) - conclusions
- sensitive responsiveness is the major factor determining the quality of attachments - sensitive mothers correctly interpret infants' signals and respond appropriately to their needs - sensitive mothers tend to have securely-attached babies - insensitive mothers tend to have insecurely-attached babies
62
Ainsworth's strange situation (1969) strength - high validity
- attachment type is strongly predictive of later development - babies assessed as securely attached typically have more success at school and more successful friendships/relationships - insecure-resistant attachment is associated with bullying and mental health issues - therefore, this concept can explain subsequent outcomes
63
Ainsworth's strange situation (1969) strength - high inter-rater reliability
- controlled conditions - behavioural categories are easy to observe Bick et al (2012) - looked at inter-rater reliability in a team of trained strange situation observers - found agreement on attachment type for 94% of tested babies
64
Ainsworth's strange situation (1969) weakness - culture bias
- findings may not apply to countries outside Western Europe and the USA - cultural differences in childhood experience means that children are likely to respond differently to the strange situation - caregivers from different cultures may behave differently - the strange situation contains elements unfamiliar to some cultures e.g. being left with strangers Takahashi (1990) - Japanese mothers are rarely separated from their babies and therefore there are high levels of separation anxiety - at the reunion stage, Japanese mothers rushed to their babies and scooped them up - this meant that the child's response was hard to observe
65
Ainsworth's strange situation (1969) weakness - lacks ecological validity
- the strange situation is laboratory based with a script and is therefore artificial - this is far removed from everyday situations - the situation also focuses too much on the behaviour of infants, and not enough on the behaviour of mothers
66
Ainsworth's strange situation (1969) weakness - ethics
- the strange situation deliberately stresses infants to see their reactions - it has therefore been labelled unethical - however, it could be seen as justifiable, as the stress caused is no greater than that of everyday experiences
67
Ainsworth's strange situation (1969) weakness - Main and Weston (1981)
- found that children acted differently in the strange situation depending on which parent they were with - children might be insecurely attached to their mothers but securely attached to their fathers - this illustrates that attachment types are linked to individual relationships with carers, not characteristics of children - therefore, it may be invalid
68
Ainsworth's strange situation (1969) weakness - at least one more attachment type
- Main and Solomon (1986) pointed out that a minority of children display atypical attachments that don't fall under types A, B, or C - this atypical attachment is commonly known as 'disorganised attachment' - disorganised children display an odd mix of resistant and avoidant behaviour - this questions the validity of Ainsworth's work
69
cultural variations in attachment
- if different patterns of attachment type are found cross-culturally, it would mean that infants' attachment types aren't biological, but learned through exposure to different child-rearing styles - in Britain, we view insecure-avoidant attachment negatively as it's associated with weak attachments to people - in Germany, it's valued as it's associated with being independent - in Germany, more infants are classed as being insecure-avoidant
70
cultural variations in attachment - Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988)
- conducted a meta-analysis to look at the proportions of attachment types across a range of countries - they also looked at the differences within the same countries to measure variation within a culture
71
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) - procedure
- researchers analysed 32 studies of attachment where the strange situation had been used to investigate the proportions of infants with different attachment types - the 32 studies were conducted in 8 countries - overall, the 32 studies gathered results for 1990 children - the data for these studies was meta-analysed
72
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) - findings
- in all countries, secure attachment was the most common type - however, the proportion varied from 75% in Britain to 50% in China - insecure-resistant was the least common type - however, the proportions ranged from 3% in Britain to around 30% in Israel - insecure-avoidant attachments were observed most commonly in Germany and least commonly in Japan
73
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) - conclusions
- secure attachment seems to be the norm in a wide range of countries - this supports Bowlby's idea that attachment is innate and universal - the research also clearly shows that cultural practices have an influence on attachment type
74
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) strength - large samples
- the meta-analysis studied 1900 babies and their primary attachment figures - large samples increase internal validity by reducing the impact of anomalous results caused by bad methodology or unusual participants
75
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) weakness - samples compare countries, not cultures
- the study claimed to study cultural variation, however the comparisons were between countries, not cultures - within any country, there are multiple different cultures, each with different child-rearing practices - for example, one sample might over-represent people living in poverty - the particular cultural characteristics and caregiving styles need to be specified
76
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) weakness - method of assessment is biased
- cross-cultural psychology includes the ideas of etic and emic - etic means cultural universals, and emic means cultural uniqueness - the strange situation was designed by an American researcher (Ainsworth) based on a British theory (Bowlby) - therefore, there's a question of whether these theories and assessments can be applied to other cultures - this is called imposed etic - for example, the idea that a lack of separation anxiety indicates an insecure attachment - in Germany, this behaviour may be seen as independence rather than avoidance
77
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) weakness - lack of validity
- the test itself may be culture-bound - the strange situation contains elements unfamiliar to some cultures - the greater amounts of insecure-resistant attachment in Japan may result from stress due to infants' unfamiliarity of being left with strangers - temperament may also be more influential on behaviour than attachment - the strange situation lacks ecological validity due to its artificial nature
78
learning theory explanation of attachment
- behaviour is acquired through experience - association and consequences - sometimes called a 'cupboard love' approach - children learn to love whoever feeds them
79
learning theory explanation of attachment - classical conditioning
- learning through association - attachments are learned through the stimulus of food (UCS) - food naturally produces pleasure (UCR) - food (UCS) is constantly paired with the caregiver (NS), resulting in pleasure (UCS) - the infant learns to associate pleasure (CR) solely with the caregiver (CS), even without the presence of food
80
learning theory explanation of attachment - operant conditioning
- learning through consequences - operant conditioning can explain why babies cry for comfort - crying leads to a positive response from the caregiver (feeding) - this behaviour is therefore positively reinforced - the baby is more likely to cry to reduce the unpleasant feeling of hunger - this behaviour is therefore negatively reinforced - the caregiver also receives negative reinforcement as the crying stops
81
learning theory explanation of attachment weakness - counter evidence from human research
- Schaffer and Emerson's study showed that many babies developed a primary attachment to their biological mother even though other carers did most of the feeding - this shows that feeding isn't the key element to attachment - there is therefore no UCS involved - attachment is more complex and emotional
82
learning theory explanation of attachment weakness - ignores other factors associated with attachment
- research into infant-caregiver interaction suggests that the quality of attachment is associated with factors such as reciprocity and interactional synchrony - studies have also shown that the best quality attachments are with sensitive carers that pick up infant signals and respond appropriately
83
learning theory explanation of attachment weakness - reductionist
- explains complex behaviours in a simple way - doesn't consider cognitive processes or the emotional nature of attachments
84
learning theory explanation of attachment strength - Dollard and Miller (1950)
- argued that in their first year, babies are fed 2000 times, generally by the main carer - this creates an opportunity for the carer to become associated with the removal of the unpleasant feeling of hunger (negative reinforcement) - supports the idea that attachments are learned through operant conditioning
85
learning theory explanation of attachment weakness - Bowlby (1973)
- argued that babies only need food occasionally, but constantly require emotional security and closeness - suggests that food isn't the main reason for the formation of attachments
86
Bowlby's Monotropic Theory
- Bowlby rejected learning theory as an explanation for attachment - instead, he looked at the work of Lorenz and Harlow - he proposed an evolutionary explanation - attachment was an innate system that gave a survival advantage - through evolution, infants became genetically programmed to behave towards their mothers in ways that increased their survival chances
87
Bowlby's Monotropic Theory - monotropy
- emphasis on a child's attachment to one particular caregiver - he believed that this attachment is different and more important - he believed that the more time spent with this mother figure, the better
88
Bowlby's Monotropic Theory - principles
The Law of Continuity - the more constant and predictable a child's care, the better the quality of their attachment The Law of Accumulated Separation - the effects of every separation from the mother adds up
89
Bowlby's Monotropic Theory - social releasers
- through evolution, infants become genetically programmed to behave towards their mothers in ways that increase their survival chances - these social releasers include crying, looking, smiling, vocalising, following, and clinging - mothers and babies have innate predisposition to become attached - social releasers trigger that response in caregivers - Bowlby recognised that attachment was a reciprocal process - overall, Bowlby saw attachment functioning as a control system to maintain proximity to the mother
90
Bowlby's Monotropic Theory - critical period
- the time within which an attachment must form if it's to form at all - approximately up to 2.5-3 years - Lorenz and Harlow noted that attachment in birds and monkeys had critical periods
91
Bowlby's Monotropic Theory - internal working model
- the first attachment forms a blueprint for future relationships, like a schema - they carry our perception of what relationships are like so will be important in affecting a child's future relationships - the internal working model affects the child's later ability to be a parent themselves
92
Bowlby's Monotropic Theory weakness - mixed evidence for monotropy
- Bowlby believed that babies generally formed one attachment to their primary caregiver, and that this attachment was special and different - only after this attachment could multiple attachments be formed - however, Schaffer and Emerson (1964) found that most babies did attach to one person first, but a significant minority were also able to form multiple attachments at the same time - it's unclear whether there's something unique about the first attachment
93
Bowlby's Monotropic Theory weakness - Lamb et al (1982)
- studied the attachments infants had with people like fathers, grandparents, and siblings - found that infants had different attachments for different purposes rather than attachments being a hierarchy - e.g. infants go to fathers for play, but mothers for comfort - this goes against Bowlby's idea of monotropy
94
Bowlby's Monotropic Theory strength - Bailey et al (2007)
- assessed 99 mothers with one year old babies on the quality of their attachment to their own mothers by interviewing them - the researchers also assessed the attachment of the babies to the mothers by observation - it was found that the mothers who reported poor attachments to their own parents were more likely to have poor attachments to their children - this supports the internal working model
95
Bowlby's Monotropic Theory weakness - social sensitivity
- monotropy has major implications for the lifestyle choices mothers make when their children are young - the law of accumulated separation states that having substantial time apart from a primary attachment figure risks having a poor quality attachment - this increases pressure on mothers - they're set up to take the blame for anything that goes wrong for the child in later life - it also pushes the mother into particular choices e.g. not returning to work after the child is born, which can have economic implications - Bowlby's theory has been used by right-wing political figures as scientific proof that women should be at home mothering children instead of working
96
the influence of early attachment on relationships - internal working model (Bowlby)
- suggests that a child having their first relationship with their primary attachment figure forms a mental representation of this relationship - acts as a template for future relationships - therefore, the quality of the child's first attachment is crucial
97
the effect of attachment type on relationships in later childhood
- securely attached infants tend to form the best quality childhood friendships - insecurely attached infants have friendship difficulties Smith (1998) assessed attachment type and bullying involvement in 196 children aged 7-11, and found: - insecure-avoidant infants are most likely to be victims of bullying - insecure-resistant infants are most likely to be bullies
98
the effect of attachment type on relationships in adulthood
McCarthy (1999) studied 40 adult women who had been assessed as infants to establish their early attachment type, and found that: - securely attached infants had the best friendships and relationships - insecure-resistant infants had problems maintaining friendships - insecure-avoidant infants struggled with intimacy in romantic relationships
99
the effect of attachment on relationships in adulthood as a parent
- internal working models affect the child's ability to parent their own children - attachment type therefore tends to be passed on through generations Bailey et al (2007) - assessed 99 mothers with one year old babies on the quality of their attachment to their own mothers by interviewing them - the researchers also assessed the attachment of the babies to the mothers through observation - it was found that the mothers who reported poor attachments to their own parents were more likely to have poor attachments to their children
100
the influence of early attachment on relationships strength - Hazan and Shaver (1987)
- in addition to Smith (1998) and McCarthy (1999) - conducted a classic study of the association between attachment and adult relationships - analysed 620 replies to a 'love quiz' in an American local newspaper - the quiz assessed current/most important relationship, general love experiences e.g. numbers of partners, and attachment type - they found that securely attached (56%) were most likely to have longer lasting relationships, insecure-avoidant (25%) tended to reveal jealousy and fear of intimacy, and insecure-resistant (19%) were most vulnerable to loneliness
101
the influence of early attachment on relationships weakness - evidence on continuity of attachment type is mixed
Zimmerman (2000) - assessed infant attachment type and adolescent attachment to parents - there was little relationship between quality of infant and adolescent attachments - this rejects the theory of internal working models
102
the influence of early attachment on relationships weakness - validity issues
- infant-parent attachment is assessed by interviews or questionnaires - it's also not assessed in infancy but years later - assessment relies on self-report techniques where validity is limited - they depend on participants being honest and having a realistic view of their own relationships - relies on accurate recollections of early relationships
103
the influence of early attachment on relationships weakness - cause and effect issues
- a third environmental factor such as parenting style might affect attachment and the child's ability to form relationships - the child's temperament may also have an influence
104
the influence of early attachment on relationships weakness - deterministic
- people aren't doomed to always have bad relationships just because they had attachment issues - other factors are likely to be influential too - the internal working model is therefore deterministic and pessimistic
105
Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation
- suggests that constant presence of nurture from a mother or mother-substitute is essential for normal psychological development of babies - disruption of the attachment bond, even short term, can result is serious and permanent damage to a child's emotional, social, and intellectual development
106
Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation - the critical period
- if there's prolonged separation before 2.5 years, this could affect psychological development - psychological damage is inevitable
107
Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation - short-term separation
- brief, temporary separation e.g. day care - separation only becomes an issue for development if the child is deprived - Bowlby described the distress caused in a PDD model
108
Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation - PDD model
Protest - immediate reaction to separation (crying, screaming, clinging to mother) Despair - calmer, more apathetic behaviour, anger and fear still felt, little response to offers of comfort, child may comfort themselves Detachment - child responds to others again but treats everyone warily, rejection of caregiver on return is common and a sign of anger
109
Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation - long-term deprivation
- lengthy or permanent separations from attachment figures e.g. divorce, death - delayed intellectual development - low IQ - lack of emotional well-being, social development, self-concept, stress, and depression - affectionless psychopathy
110
Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation - privation
- children who have never formed an attachment bond - more likely to lead to lasting damage - some individuals fully recover, whilst others make little to no improvement - relatively rare - case studies - some of the problems include language issues, hostility towards adults, physical underdevelopment, low IQ, and learning difficulties
111
Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation strength - Quinton and Rutter (1976)
- found greater behavioural problems in samples of adolescents separated briefly from attachment figures before 5 years of age through hospitalisation, in comparison to adolescents who weren't hospitalised - supports Bowlby's prediction of long-term damage
112
Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation weakness - poor evidence
- Bowlby drew on a number of sources of evidence for maternal deprivation e.g. children orphaned during WW2 - other factors such as trauma and poor after-care may have caused later development difficulties rather than separation - not just maternal care that was deprived - case studies are dependent on retrospective memories that may be selective and incorrect
113
Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation weakness - individual differences
- individual differences when reacting to short-term separation are important - e.g. securely attached children and more mature children cope better with separation - only some children experience distress
114
Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation strength - practical application
- research into long-term deprivation has allowed psychologists to create strategies to help children cope with divorce - some American states have a legal requirement for divorcing parents to attend an education programme which teaches them to understand and avoid the difficulties associated with disrupted attachments
115
Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation strength/weakness - Curtis (1977)
- case study support - reported on Genie, a girl denied human interaction - she was beaten and strapped into a potty seat until discovered at age 13 - she couldn't stand up or speak, and spent most of her time spitting - she received years of therapy - she developed some language abilities and improved her IQ from 38 to 74 - at 18, she returned to the care of her mother - she stayed for a few months before moving to six other foster homes where she was further abused - Genie deteriorated physically and mentally, and went to live in a home for people with learning disabilities - this may support Bowlby's theory - however, there may be other factors, such as physical abuse, creating the negative outcomes, not just the lack of attachment figure - it's also problematic to generalise from unique case studies
116
Romanian orphan studies (the effects of institutionalisation)
- used to investigate the effects of maternal deprivation - former Romanian president required women to have five children - many Romanian parents couldn't afford to keep their children, and therefore they ended up in orphanages with extremely poor conditions - many of the children were adopted, some by British parents
117
Rutter's English and Romanian Adoptee Study (2011) - Procedure
- followed a group of 165 Romanian orphans adopted in Britain - wanted to test to what extent good care could make up for poor early experiences in institutions - physical, cognitive, and emotional development was assessed at ages 4, 6, 11, and 15 years - a group of 52 British children adopted around the same time served as a control group
118
Rutter's English and Romanian Adoptee Study (2011) - Findings
- when they first arrived in the UK, half of the adoptees showed signs of delayed intellectual development - the majority were severely malnourished - at age 11, the adopted children showed differential rates of recovery that were related to their age of adoption - 'disinhibited attachment' - attachment style with symptoms of attention seeking, clinginess, social behaviour directed indiscriminately towards all adults, both familiar and unfamiliar - children adopted after 6 months old showed signs of disinhibited attachment
119
romanian orphan studies - the effects of institutionalisation
- delayed intellectual development - shown by low IQ - problems with emotional development - shown by tantrums - lack of internal working model - shown by difficulty interacting with peers and forming close relationships - quasi-autism - shown by problems understanding the meaning of social contexts, may display obsessive behaviour
120
romanian orphan studies strength - real-life application
- led to improvements in the way that children are cared for in institutions e.g. orphanages now avoid having a large number of caregivers for each child - they have one key worker - therefore, disinhibited attachment is avoided
121
romanian orphan studies weakness - the romanian orphanages weren't typical
- it's possible that the conditions were so bad that the results can't be applied to understanding the impact of better institutional care or any other situation where children experience deprivation - there were extremely low levels of intellectual stimulation - lack of generalisability
122
romanian orphan studies weakness - methodological issues
- children weren't randomly assigned to conditions - the researchers didn't interfere with the adoption process - this means that children adopted earlier may have been more sociable - this is a confounding variable as the children adopted early would have been a certain type of people
123
romanian orphan studies strength - shows long-term effects
- followed the orphans into their teens - some lasting effects of early experience have been found - both long-term and short-term effects can therefore be seen