Identify the 5 objectives of IBC (Insurance Bureau of Canada).
Identify 6 areas of Canadian legislations (federal/provincial) that promotes financial soundness of insurance companies.
(Hint = CIRCA-F)
What has been the 5 focus areas of Canadian Insurance regulation since Confederation
Marketing integrity & improvement of insurance contractownershiptaxesHonesty & competence of intermediaries (Ex: agents)solvent to protect policyholders(Hint = MOTHS)
Identify 2 ADVANTAGES and 2 DISADVANTAGES of foreign participation in the Canadian insurance industry
Advantages:
1. COMPETITION: produces (lower prices, higher availability) for Canadians
2. INNOVATION: good for consumers
Disadvantages:
1. Foreign parent failure is the main cause of Canadian insolvency
2. Take market share from domestic insurers
What conditions (3) eventually led to public control regarding solvency
Briefly explain the difference between guidelines & legislation for insurance regulation
Guidelines are more flexible than legislation
Legislation must go through senate, house of commons, and get royal approval
Who oversees the Canadian
a) Solvency regulation
b) Rate regulation
(Federal or Provincial)
a) both - cooperative federalism has been achieved in practice
b) provincial
How does federal legislation protect Canadian insureds of foreign insurance companies (2)
What is a ‘contract of indemnity’
Contract where amount recoverable is measured by insured’s pecuniary loss
Briefly explain the important intent of doctrine of subrogation
Prevent over-compensation of insured
What is the ‘principle of indemnity’
After covered loss, return insured to former financial position (before loss), and neither penalize nor reward
Briefly discuss whether a life insurance contract is considered an indemnity policy.
No, because the amount recoverable is not measured by the loss.
The amount payable is fixed and written into the contract.
Identify 2 conditions that an insurer must establish to be entitled to recover under an indemnity insurance contract.
Briefly describe how a ‘valued policy’ differs from a typical insurance policy.
Proof of amount of loss not required because compensation is pre-determined by contract
Identify the 2 necessary conditions for reimbursement under ‘valued' insurance policy.
valued' insurance policy : ex: life insurance
Glynn vs Scottish : Facts,Issue and rulings - T/A
Facts:
Glynn injured in auto accident
- was reimbursed by other driver’s insurer (including medical)
- Glynn sued to DOUBLE-RECOVER medical from own insurer under Section B
Issue: Does Glynn’s insurer have right to subrogation?
RULING:
Section B of policy is contract of indemnity, Glynn’s insurer needs to be able to subrogate. Since the insurer cannot subrogate in this case, he does not need to pay. (also, contract of indemnity means no possibility of double-recovery).Fletcher v MPIC: Facts, Issues (2) ,Ruling (3-T/A/SC)
Facts:
Fletcher was in serious accident, person responsible was underinsured. Fletcher has requested max coverage but MPIC employee didn't provide UMC. Customer relied on MPIC.
Issues:
1. Is Government Insurer responsible for informing customers of available covgs?
2. Issue 2: What is the extent of liab should it fail to do so?
Ruling:
Ruling T/A/SC: Insured / Insurer / Insured ( duty of care)
Criteria establishing duty of care:
1. Does reliance exist?
2. Is reliance expected?
3. Is reliance reasonable?
Dillon v Guardian Ins Co: Facts, Issues ,Ruling
Facts:
- Policyholder Dillon has a policy limit of $50K, got sued for $100K, then proposed to settle for $46K.
- Guardian rejected a settlement that was LESS THAN the policy limit
- subsequent jury award GREATER THAN policy limit
- insured sued insurer for excess amount of award above policy limit
**Issues: **
insurer be held liable for failing to settle a claim within policy imits. Hence exposing the insured to a judgment exceeding those limits.Ruling: In favor of insured - ABSOLUTE LIABILITY STANDARD established.
- Insurer absolutely liable for amount exceeding policy limit since they could have settled but didn't
- Arguments for absolute liability:
1. Avoids determining whether 1st offer was reasonable.
2. Prevent gambling - Lowers probability of insurer gambling with insured’s money.
What are the 3 different possible standards for liability
Define the standard of absolute liability
IF settlement possible BUT rejected by insurer THEN insurer is liable for all costs (even in excess of policy limit)