To rexamine Piaget’s mountain study to determine the validity of egocentrism in young children.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
Procedure
A
Participants aged 3-4 years old and mostly white
Important: There were two copies of each display: one in front of Grover, one in front of the child. Story: Grover is driving by this scene and stops to take a look, can you show me what Grover sees?
Training: Child shown a firetruck, introduced to Grover sitting on a different part of the table. Child told to rotate their firetruck so they saw it the same way as Grover.
During training, mistakes were corrected
1st mistake: researcher and child would get up, move to Grover, check out his POV
2nd mistake: researcher moved the display to the correct position
Assessment portion of experiment:
Phase 1: simple scene with toys, Phase 2: Three mountain task, Phase 3: complicated scene with toys
Mistakes were not corrected in these phases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
Findings
A
All subjects were highly accurate in their prediction of Grover’s POV on the two scenes containing toys
Children made significantly more errors in the prediction of Grover’s POV on the three mountain task
From errors made only ⅓ were egocentric, slightly over ⅔ were random
Provides critique for Piaget’s stages of development as most 3 to 4 year olds could accurately take the POV of Grover, suggests that the three mountain task was too difficult (lacked internal validity)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
Strengths
A
n comparison with other experiments that used photos or models that the child had to make, the displays were easier for children to use (children find it hard to transition from a 2-D image to a 3-D display)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
Limitations
A
Scaffolding was used, unlike Piaget
May have taught subjects how to do the task, not clear if they actually understand POV
Sampling bias: taken from an American university, mainly White children of students (¼ from surrounding neighborhood)