Cases Flashcards

(9 cards)

1
Q

Nettleship v Weston

A
  • learners those with inexperience owe a duty of care to others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Bolan v Friern Hospital

A
  • docters owe duty of care to their patients/others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Donoghue v Stevenson

A
  • manufacturers owe a duty of care to consumers/customers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

State the law on forseeabilty (1st part of the Caparo test)

A
  • ask was some damage or harm reasonably forseeable as a result of the defendant’s actions?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the leading case on forseeabilty and state what happened in this case.

A
  • Kent v Griffiths
  • the patient suffered a heart attack due to the delyas of the ambulance driver.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

State the law on duty of care: proximity ( 2nd part of the Caparo test)

A
  • asks is there proxmity between the claiment and defendant. Proximity means the closeness and can be terms of time, space and relationship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Bournhill and Young (leading case of proximity)

A

-Suffers a miscarriage due to seeing the accident.
-Fails to claim against the motorcylist as she was in a safe place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

State the law on duty of care: policy (3rd part of the Caparo test)

A

-asks if it is fair,just and reasonable to impose a duty on the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly