performance appraisals
formalized way of assessing worker performance in comparison to certain established organizational standard
comparative methods
comparison of one worker performance against others
multiple perspectives
increases the reliability of performance ratings
lessen bias
halo effect
overall positive evaluation of a worker based on one known positive characteristic or action
actor observer bias
tendency for appraiser to place greater emphasis on dispositional factor & lesser emphasis on situational factors that may have affected performance
individual methods
Objective performance criteria
measured of job performance that are easily quantified
criterion contamination
extent to which performance appraisals contain elements that detract from the accurate assessment of job effectiveness
(ex: employer when to the same school as employee and treats him better)
use of multiple reviewers and 360 feedback
360 - gathers all PA from a work’s supervisor, subordinates, peers, customers, and other relevant parties
lessens bias and increase reliability bcoz there’s more to look at
employee comparison methods
factors that affect perceptions of fairness
common rating errors
types of training
transfer of training
concept if the training is actually applied in the work setting
needs anaylsis
organizational must have some idea of what workers need to know to perform their jobs
task analysis
concerned w/ KASOs
demographic analysis
determining the specific training needs of various demographic groups
ex: women and men, certain ethnic minorities, and workers of different age brackets