Advantages
* Closed reduction
* Dynamization and correction post-op
* Flexibility in configurations
* Adjustable
Disadvantages
* Pin tract infection
* Post-op care
* Bending moments on pins
* Not long term
* Premature loosening
* Owner compliance
Smooth steinmann pins
* Prone to loosening, pullout and failure → not recommended
Positive profile pins
* Threads added to shaft
* Greater stiffness, axial pullout strength, fatigue life
* Cancellous → coarser pitch with flatter thread - not for cortical bc microfracture and pull out
* Cortical → thinner pitch with rounded thread → better for ESF
Negative profile pins
* Have threads cut into the shaft so that the core diameter with the threads is smaller than the diameter of the pin
* Originally abrupt transition between threads and smooth area = stress riser
* Gradual transition between threaded and non-threaded portion avoids the stress riser
• What is the recommended diameter for the pins?
• Large diameter → more resistant to bending and fatigue
• Large diameter has better hold at the pin/clamp interface
• Name the pins that are shown here and discuss the differences between each of them.
• Ellis type negative profile pin
• Threads are cut into the shaft which causes smaller diameter
• Positive profile pin
• Thread applied to the shaft so that the diameter is maintained
• Negative profile pin with tapered thread run-out - Duraface IMEX
• Positive profile pin is overlying the Duraface pin showing that the shaft of the Diraface is larger than the positive profile pin
• [Image in source document]
• How do positive profile pins compare to smooth pins?
• Same internal diameter, but cancellous vs cortical threads on one end;
• Greater stiffness, greater axial pull out strength, greater fatigue life
• What is the advantage of the new negative profile pins compared to the older negative profile pins?
• Threads + non-threaded portion share same outer diameter
• Tapered transition mitigates stress riser effects
• Maximizes diameter of threaded portion in bone and the diameter of shaft portion outside the bone
• Why is larger shaft diameter desirable? (ie, in negative profile pins)
• Greater resistance to bending or failure in cyclic load
• Less likelihood of slippage of pin within the clamp or rotation of the pin around the clamp
• What is the difference between half vs full pins?
• Half - penetrate soft tissue envelope on one side of bone, engage cis and trans cortex
• Full - penetrate both sides of soft tissue envelope, engaging both cortices (go all the way through the bone and leg)
• Clamps rely on compression of components resulting in what force, which leads to stabilization of the construct?
• friction
• What are the types of connecting bars? (5)
• Acrylic (APEF)
• Carbon fiber
• Titanium
• Aluminum
• Stainless steel
• What effect does increasing the size of the connecting bar on pins?
• Increases stiffness w/out increasing size of pins
• Decreases load on individual pins → protects the pin bone interface
• Which bars are radiolucent?
• Aluminum
• Titanium
• Carbon fiber
• Which is stronger for a given diameter, titanium or carbon fiber?
• Titanium 2x as strong as carbon fiber
• How can you strengthen the pin/acrylic interface?
• Notches in the pins for greater surface area
• Use pins with knurled shaft
• What are the methods to augmenting the fixator?
• Diagonals - interconnecting bars that span the fracture (figure C above)
• Articulations - interconnecting bars at one end of the bone (figure F above)
• Alternating connecting clamps and pins on either side of a large connecting bar
• Combined frames → combine frames with other fixations like IM pin or ILN
• What are 2 types of augmenting bars and what is their purpose?
• Articulations - interconnecting bar at one end of fixator that doesn’t cross the fracture gap
• Diagonals - interconnecting bars that cross the fracture gap
• *add rigidity
• What bar types are amenable to become diagonal bars?
• Titanium
• Stainless steel
• NOT carbon fiber
• What do additions of diagonals or articulations do for a hybrid I-II frame?
• Add bending, torsional, and axial stiffness
• Where is a I-II frame most commonly placed, and for what fx type?
• Humeral and femoral supracondylar fractures