Chapter 1 Flashcards

Psychology and Scientific Thinking (84 cards)

1
Q

Psychology

A

The scientific study of the mind, brain and behaviour. It’s a discipline that spans multiple levels of analysis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Social Cultural Influences (social or behavioural level)

A

Involves relating to others and personal relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Psychological (mental or neurological level)

A

Involves thoughts, feelings and emotions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Biological (molecular or neurochemical)

A

Involves molecules and brain structure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Scientific investigations are

A

systematic and empirical.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Systematic

A

Plan for objectively collecting information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Empirical

A

Knowledge is acquired through observation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

All actions of human behaviour are

A

multiply determined.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Individual differences

A

variations among people in their thinking, emotion, personality or behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Reciprocal determinism

A

we mutually influence each other’s behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Be careful with common sense…

A

it can be useful, but also flawed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Naive Realism (give an example)

A

Belief that we see the world precisely as it is. “Seeing is believing” EX: Happy employees tend to be more productive than unhappy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Scientific Theory

A

Explanation for a large number of findings in the natural world (Generate hypothesis).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Hypothesis

A

Testable prediction derived from a scientific theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Theory

A

Specific explanation for an event. (They cannot be proven corrected).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Scientists are prone to

A

self-deception (sometimes bias towards theories).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Scientific methods are

A

tools for overcoming confirmation bias.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Confirmation Bias

A

The tendency to seek out evidence that supports our beliefs and deny, dismiss, or distort evidence that contradicts them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Belief Perseverance

A

The tendency to stick to our initial beliefs, even when evidence contradicts them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Metaphysical Claims (give an example)

A

Assertions about the world that are not testable. EX: Is there an afterlife? Does God exist?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Popular Psychology

A

Internet info, news articles, movies (good but untested)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Pseudoscience (give an example)

A

A set of claims that seem scientific, but isn’t. EX: “New meditation technique cures all depression!”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Exaggerated Claims

A

Overstated or false statements with an overreliance on anecdotes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Anecdotes (give an example)

A

A personal story used to support a claim. EX: testimonials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Overuse of ad hoc immunizing hypothesis
A way to explain away disconfirming evidence.
26
Lack of self-correction
No method for getting rid of unsupported claims.
27
Why are we drawn to pseudoscience?
We search for order in a complex world and we enjoy to find comfort in our beliefs.
28
Personal Benefits
Believing what we want to be true.
29
Thinking Clearly
An antidote against pseudoscience.
30
Emotional Reasoning Fallacy
Use emotions as guides to evaluate a claim.
31
Bandwagon Fallacy
Accept a claim because many people believe it.
32
Not me Fallacy
Belief that we are immune from errors in thinking that afflict other people.
33
Opportunity Cost
EX: People do not seek scientifically supported treatments for mental health problems.
34
Direct Harm
Pseudoscience treatment makes the problem worse or causes health problems.
35
An inability to think scientifically as citizens
Failure to think critically.
36
Scientific Skepticism
The approach of evaluating all claims with an open mind, but insisting on persuasive evidence before accepting them as true.
37
Skepticism is not
cynicism.
38
Principle #1: Ruling out rival hypothesis
Consider alternative explanations for findings; which explanation best describes the findings?
39
Experimentation is important
for ruling out alternative explanations. EX: Use control groups & placebos
40
Principle #2: Correlation is not causation
Just because two things are associated/correlated doesn't mean one causes the other.
41
Correlation research designs
do not permet causal inferences.
42
Principle #3: Falsifiability
Applies to claims, hypothesis and theories. It must be possible to dispose a claim.
43
The predictions are testable
but could be wrong.
44
Principle #4: Replicability
Psychological findings must be reproduced. Findings can occur by chance!
45
Replications with variations
change elements of the study when replicating.
46
Media reports on original findings
Media tends to report original findings, but failed replications.
47
Problems with replication in psyc
Open Science Collaboration
48
Principle #5: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence (give an example)
If a claim goes against what we already know, the evidence for the claim must be strong. EX: Alien abductions
49
Principle #6: Occam's Razor (KISS)
Principle of Parsimony. When several explanations account for a phenomenon, the simplest explanation is often the best. KISS: Keep It Stupid Simple!
50
Goals of Science
Scientists want to describe, explain, predict and control events.
51
Variables (give examples)
Any factor or attribute that can assume two or more values. EX: Personality characteristics, mental states
52
Description
Identifies and provides an account of some phenomenon of interest, and its characteristics.
53
Takes many forms across the sciences (give examples)
EX: Identifying stars, categorizing animals, measuring the prevalence of behaviour.
54
Explanation
Scientists seek to understand why phenomenon occur.
55
Explanations take the form of
hypothesis and theories.
56
Prediction
Use knowledge about events or variables to predict an outcome of interest.
57
Control
To exert influence over research settings, procedures, and over the application of scientific knowledge.
58
Two contexts of control
1. Research Activities: variables participants, experimental setting. 2. Application of scientific knowledge: EX treatments for depression, workplace settings, soda tax.
59
Psychology's Past and Present
Inquiry into psychological questions has been going on for thousands of years.
60
Plato
"Wax tablet" analogy for memory.
61
Aristotle
Associations between ideas.
62
Descartes
Dualism - the mind as distinct from matter
63
Scientific Psychology
Psycho physical measurements. In 1879: Wundt develops the first psychological laboratory in Leipzig, Germany.
64
Introspection
Participants carefully reflect and report on their inner sensations and experiences.
65
Theoretical Frameworks of Psychology
Broad, theoretical perspectives that guide how people think about psychological phenomenon.
66
Structuralism (founded by who?)
School of psychology that aimed to identify the basic elements of the psychological experience. Founded by Edward Titchener.
67
Structuralism positives + negatives
Positives: Positive: structuralism attempted systematic observation Negatives: Disagreement among introspectionists, imageless thought.
68
Functionalism (founded by who?)
Focused on the functions and adaptive purposes of psychological characteristics, such as thoughts, feelings, and behaviour. Asked "why" instead of "what". Founded by William James.
69
Behaviourism (founded by who?)
The scientific study of observable behaviour that focused on discovering general laws of learning. Founded by John Watson.
70
Key behaviourist
B.F. Skinner
71
Anti-mentalistic (positives + negatives)
The mind is a black box. Positives: clarified learnings principles, brought a focus onto observable and verifiable subject matter. Negatives: went too far bu suggesting that everything is learned
72
Cognitivism/Cognitive Psychology
Understanding thinking is central to understanding behaviour (response to behaviourist ideas).
73
Some Area of cognition
Perception, attention, memory, language and reasoning.
74
Cognitive neuroscience
Examines relation between brain functioning and thinking.
75
Psychoanalysis (founded by)
Focuses on internal psychological processes of which we are unanware. Unconscious memories and drives cause behaviour. Founded by Sigmund Freud.
76
Psychoanalysis positives + negatives
Positives: Focus on unconscious drivers of behaviour. Negatives: Freud's "unconscious" processes are not the same as scientifically demonstrated non-conscious determinants of behaviour. Many unscientific claims - not testable.
77
The Great Debates of Psychology - Nature vs. Nurture
Are our behaviours attributable mostly to our genes (nature) or to our rearing environments (nurture)?
78
Early thinkers and behaviourists often thought that the environment/experience (give an example)
shaped thinking and behaviour. EX: John Locke - blank paper
79
Current State of the debate
Both genes and environment play a role in most behaviours More nuanced approach → relative contributions of each
80
Evolutionary Psychology
Psychological traits are adaptive - they help us survive and pass on our genes Problem: Many explanations are not falsifiable
81
Free Will vs. Determinism
Free will seems self-evident Some argue that free will is an illusion • Many environmental factors influence us without our knowledge • Behaviour is generated automatically
82
Basic Research
Examines the fundamental nature of phenomena • Contributes to a core body of knowledge
83
Applied Research
Helps to solve or evaluate a specific real-world problem
84
Examples of psychological research in our lives
Yellow fire engines, hands-free technology in vehicles, police lineups, and placement of foods