3 Major types of learning
Classical Conditioning
- view of human
-ppl learn if rewarded or punished for behavior. Biological factors account for individual diffs in susceptibility to classical conditioning. Classical conditioning perspective presumes that human is an automaton and acts in monotonous routine manner w/out intelligence
Operant Learning
Social Learning
more complex; involves watching others and organizing social experiences in the brain. Most representative of contemp psych. enables us to integrate knowledge from aspects of encironment and to consider bio and social environment
Behaviorism
Pavlov’s dogs
Pavlov’s Dogs: Meat was US, saliva was UR, bell became CS, saliva to bell became CR
Cognitive processes
processes are those internal mental processes that enable us to imagine, gain knowledge, to reason and to evaluate info
Stimulus & Response
Skinner’s theory
Behaviorism as method of science
-Behaviorism posits that knowledge about human behavior can be best advanced if we use referents that have a physical basis and can be publicly observed (private events inside heads not seen so not subjected to rules of science)
Behaviorism as perspective of human nature
Reinforcement
Extinction
- Skinner’s belief
is when person recieves neither reinforcement or punishment
-Skinner said punishment is less effective way to eliminate behavior bc its temporary; instead use extinction
Operant learning and crime
- skinner’s belief to reduce crime
-Skinner said if we wish to elminate crime we must change society thru behavioral engineering based on scientific concpetion of humans. Must make society learn early that positive reinforement will not occur if they transgree against rules (difficult bc reinforcment for antisocial behavior already occuring and not always obvious and maybe complex)
Expectancy Theory
-Expectance theory says that are performacne level is based on person’s expectaion that behaving in particular way will lead to a given outcome
-Julian rotter best know for attention to importance of expectations (cognitions) about the consequences (outcomes) of behavior including the reinforment that will be gained.
-Often we develop “generalized expectancies” that are stable and consistent across stitatuations
-Applying this to criminal behavior: ppl engage in crime when the expect to gain something in form of status, power, security, affection, material goods, living conditions
- Expectancy Value Theory (Rotter)
(Basic assumption of behavior not only size of reinforcement but the belief of what the behavior will be..how likely it is rewarded)
Observational Learning
AKA modeling developed by Bandura; person aquires ways of doing something by watching others do it, direct reinforcment unesccary. Much of our behavior is acquired by watching models.
Differential Association Reinforcement Theory
Aker’s theory applied to antisocial development
first group adopts own normative defintions about what is good and bad. Normative defs become internal cog guides to what will be reinforced by group.
Sutherland’s theory
Aker’s 2 classes of discriminative stimuli
Frustration-induced criminality
Revised Frustration Aggression Hypothesis
Frustration Induced Riots
- frustration induced theory & Larceny
-Frustartion induced theory helps explain behavior of looters; people already frustrated and act out when opportunity presented
-Frustration induced theory suggests that ppl who commit larceny under these situations have materalistic goals (wanting mid class goods) that they have not yet attained. Society has blocked the goals and perosn becomes impatient and frustrated.
-