Chapter 4 (Exam 2) Flashcards

(74 cards)

1
Q

a civil claim other than a claim for breach of contract

A

tort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

person who commits a tort

A

tortfeasor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

committed when the tortfeasor breaches a legal duty to another and that breach causes a legally recognized injury

A

tort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Torts generally require that the plaintiff prove their case by a

A

Preponderance of the evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

the trier of fact, a judge or a jury, can have no reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty

A

beyond a reasonable doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

the trier of fact finds it is more likely than not that the defendant is liable for committing the wrongful act

A

prove a case by preponderance of the evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(1) to encourage people to act in a way that does not harm others
(2) to compensate the victims of a wrongful act

A

purpose of tort law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the current tort system in the United States has both

A

common law and statutory components

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

involves a situation in which the tortfeasor had no intention of creating a wrong but, because of a lapse in judgment or a failure to be careful, harmed someone else

A

unintentional tort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

results when a defendant breaches a duty of care owed to the plaintiff by acting in a way that a reasonable person would not act

A

Negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  1. The defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff.
  2. The defendant breached that duty of care.
  3. The plaintiff suffered a legally recognizable injury.
  4. The defendant’s breach was the factual and proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury.
A

prevail in a negligence claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

potentially dangerous object that might attract others—primarily children—onto land

A

attractive nuisance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

the average person in society who exercises an average amount of care when conducting their affairs

A

reasonable person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

an injury that rises above a certain legal threshold

A

legal injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

“but-for” cause of the damages, meaning that “but for” a certain event there would not have been an injury

A

Causation in fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

sometimes referred to as legal causation, requires a strong causal relationship between a breached legal duty and damages

A

Proximate cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

occurs when a violation of the law establishes a breach of duty on the part of the defendant

A

Negligence per se

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q
  1. A statute was violated by the defendant’s actions. 2. The statute was intended to prevent the type of injury that occurred.
  2. The plaintiff was an individual the statute sought to protect.
A

prove negligence per se

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

“the thing speaks for itself”

A

Res ipsa loquitur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

negligence on the part of the plaintiff contributed in some fashion to their injury

A

Contributory negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

compares the contribution of the defendant toward the plaintiff’s injury with the con-tribution of the plaintiff toward their own injury

A

Comparative negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

the defendant asserts that something beyond the defen-dant’s control intervened to cause the plaintiff’s injury

A

intervening cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

results when the plaintiff increased the likelihood of injury by knowingly engaging in a risky activity

A

Assumption of risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q
  • Contributory negligence
  • Comparative negligence
  • Intervening cause
  • Assumption of risk
A

Defenses to Negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
injuries a plaintiff sustains because the defendant failed to exercise the appropriate standard of care required in their profession
Malpractice
26
evidence provided through the testimony of professionals with similar credentials to those of the defendant
expert testimony
27
When malpractice claims are made against professionals like insurance agents or Errors and omissions brokers, real estate agents, or other agents who help individuals fill out applications or sign purchase contracts
errors and omissions
28
allows a plaintiff injured by an intoxicated tortfeasor to sue the establishment that negligently served too much alcohol to the tortfeasor
dram shop
29
an unreasonable interference with a property owner’s use and enjoyment of land
nuisance
30
the plaintiff must show that the defendant’s property use causes some hindrance to plaintiff’s enjoyment of plaintiff’s land
establish a case for a private nuisance
31
are those that cause injury to a substantial number of people, such as a tall building near an airport runway, the pollution of water, or a structurally unsafe building in a densely populated area
Public nuisances
32
imposes liability on the defendant regardless of whether the defendant acted with reasonable care
Strict liability
33
law in the United States imposes strict liability on manufacturers and distributors of a defective product regardless of whether the plain-tiff proves a breach of care
Products liability
34
the plaintiff must show that the defendant intended the action causing harm to the plaintiff, while negligence merely requires showing that the defendant did not conform to the reasonable person standard and subsequently breached their duty of care.
intentional tort
35
1. The defendant, by word or gesture, intentionally put the plaintiff in fear of immi-nent physical harm. 2. A reasonable person in the same situation would be fearful of imminent physical harm. 3. The defendant had no permission or privilege to act
assault claim
36
involves intentional physical contact that is offensive or harmful and was not consented to
Battery
37
1. The defendant touched the plaintiff with an object or the defendant’s body. 2. The touching was unwelcome or offensive. 3. A reasonable person in the same situation would find the touching harmful or offensive. 4. The defendant had no permission or privilege to act.
prove battery
38
occurs when a plaintiff, either through expressed action or implied action, provided the defendant permission to engaged in the allegedly tortious action
consent
39
limits the ability of first responders, such as firefighters and police officers, for collecting tort damages from the person who caused the danger that the safety officer was being dispatched to
Fireman’s Rule
40
occurs when a defendant confines the plaintiff through the use of physical force or verbal threats without permission or privilege
False imprisonment
41
1. The defendant made a false statement about the plaintiff. 2. The statement was published to a third party. 3. The plaintiff’s reputation was harmed as a result.
prove defamation
42
applies to a defamatory written statement
libel
43
concerns defamatory oral communication
slander
44
meaning that the statements are inherently harmful; they can be either written (libel) or verbal (slander)
defamation per se
45
is similar to defamation, but it requires untrue statements that diminish the value of property
slander of property
46
which is committed by know-ingly casting doubt on the ownership interest of another in property
slander of title
47
Defendants who use the truth in a malicious manner and publish their statement to a third party, causing harm to a plaintiff’s reputation, might still be liable for defamation under the
Defamation by implication
48
a legally recognized justification entitling the defendant to make and communicate the statement
privilege
49
exists when the defendant’s communication was made in good faith and with the proper motive
conditional privilege
50
applies to statements made in legal proceedings such as a trial or debate in the legislature
Absolute privilege
51
helps protect the privacy and identity of ordinary citizens
invasion of privacy
52
1. Publishes information that places the plaintiff in a false light 2. Publicly discloses facts about the plaintiff that a reasonable person would find objectionable or embarrassing 3. Uses the name or likeness of the plaintiff without permission for a commercial purpose 4. Invades a person’s home or private papers
invasion of privacy is committed
53
the wrongful use of another’s name or likeness for the defendant’s benefit
Appropriation
54
protects a person’s name, likeness, and other unique identifying characteristics from being used for a commercial purpose without license
right of publicity
55
When a defendant causes an emotional injury to a plaintiff by engaging in outrageous behavior
intentional infliction of emotional distress
56
constitutes an exception by prohibiting the employer for firing a worker for a reason that contravenes public policy
Wrongful termination
57
occurs whenever the defendant enters the plaintiff’s land without permission
trespass to real property
58
occurs when the defendant interferes with the plaintiff’s personal use or possession of personal property
Trespass to personal property
59
a civil remedy for theft and is commit-ted when the defendant takes or retains another’s personal property
conversion
60
a statutory device to provide security for people performing work on, or supplying materials for, the improvement of real or personal property
mechanic’s or artisan’s lien
61
designed to provide a remedy to those who are damaged through deceit
tort of fraud
62
1. The defendant misrepresented a material fact. 2. The defendant knew of the deception. 3. The defendant intended to influence the plaintiff to act or refrain from acting. 4. The plaintiff justifiably relied on the defendant’s misrepresentation. 5. The plaintiff was damaged as a resul
prove fraud
63
can be defined as requiring the plaintiff to prove it is more substantially likely than not that the defendant is liable
Clear and convincing evidence
64
includes what is referred to as “sales talk” where a seller tries to puff up or make a product seem more desirable to a buyer
puffery
65
A person who induces another to breach a contract with a third party can be held liable for
Interference with contractual relationship
66
1. There is a valid contract. 2. The defendant knew of the contract. 3. The defendant intentionally induced a party to breach the contract. 4. The plaintiff suffers damages.
prove interference with contractual relationship
67
a business that unreasonably targets a competitor’s customers or engages them may be liable for
Interference with a prospective business advantage
68
are torts occurring as part of computer-, internet-, or technology-related activities
cybertort
69
an award of money calculated to compensate a person for the harm caused by the tortfeasor
compensatory damages
70
are damages that arise “out of pocket” because of expenses incurred after the tortious act
special damages
71
compensate for losses resulting from the tort that do not have a precise economic value
general damages
72
a small amount of damages awarded for a minimal injury in certain torts even if the plaintiff cannot prove a tangible injury
Nominal damages
73
money damages awarded primarily to punish the tortfeasor for outrageous behavior
Punitive damages
74
similar to punitive damages but are generally derived only from statutes and are fixed by a preset amount or formula
Liquidated damages