Jello effect
the situation where a small change in one part of the organization requires
change and adjustment throughout the organization. E.g., in a matrix
configuration, a change in one function or project frequently requires adjustments
in a number of other functions and projects.
org complexity
The practical design questions relating to organizational complexity include: the width of specialization for the firm, the span of control for the firm, the delayering of the firm to eliminate middle management, the scope in a divisional configuration, and the limitation on the number of functions and divisions in the matrix configuration.
4 types of org complexity
blob, tall, flat, and symmetric
blob
low on vertical and horizontal differentiation
tall
low on horizontal differentiation and high on vertical differentiation
Recently, many firms have shortened their hierarchy, eliminating middle management levels in the firm. This is frequently called “delayering.” When a level is removed, the connections between the level above and the level below must also be changed.
flat
high on horizontal differentiation and low on vertical differentiation
A major advantage: each unit has autonomy to focus on its own work. On the other hand, the executive level of the organization bears the burden of coordinating among these subunits, and they can get out of synch, lack coordination, leading to inefficiencies for the firm as a whole.
symmetric
high on horizontal differentiation and high on vertical differentiation
blob fits
reactor strategy, calm environment, simple config
tall fits
efficiency goal,
defender strategy,
varied env,
functional config
flat fits
effectiveness goal,
prospector strategy,
locally stormy env,
divisional config
symmetric fits
both eff as goals,
analyzer with/without innovation,
turbulent env,
matrix config
Structures for spanning geography
The extent to which a firm locates based on optimal sourcing vs a particular geographic boundary, and the extent to which it locates to yield local responsiveness vs global standards and economies of scale.
Optimal sourcing
the decision to locate operations in the place in the world that brings the greatest advantage to the firm in terms of customer contract, cost efficiency, HR skill needed, or other objective.
Local responsiveness
the decision to distribute work in many locales versus consolidating work in one or a few centralized locations. Distributing work to many locales maximizes your firm’s flexibility to complete work tasks any time, any place.
if your firm pursues exploitation, you should organize work to be high in
optimal sourcing
your firm pursues exploration, you should organize work to be high in
responsiveness
The typology is based on the seminal work of Bartlett and Ghoshal:
global, international, multi-domestic and transnational.
global
low on both optimal sourcing and local responsiveness
Example: Software company
international
high optimal sourcing and low responsiveness
Example: oil industry
multi-domestic
low optimal sourcing and high responsiveness
transnational
high on both optimal sourcing and responsiveness
Knowledge exchange structures are
informated, network, cellular, and ad hoc communications
informated
high IT-infused, low virtualization
ad hoc communications
low IT-infused, low virtualization