Does your test measure what it reports to measure?
Construct, criterion, and content
Reliability, variability, correlation
How much does your measure add to the literature (new info on the client, construct, price. etc.)
an idea/phenomenon a test is measuring
Construct-related validity: how well does your measure for that construct
Convergent and discriminant validity
A test must be reliable to be valid, but reliability does not equate to validity
Content validity and face validity
Neither depend on statistical formulas
Construct validity because it borrows from the actual definition of validity