Leadership processes:
Sorts of leadership:
-Relationship leadership = promoting all actions that are focused on interpersonal
relationships inside the group.
Task leadership
promoting all actions that are focused on task completion.
Relationship leadership
promoting all actions that are focused on interpersonal
relationships inside the group.
Reason that a leader emerges:
Trait approach
Situationism
Interactional approach
Trait approach
leader emerges because of certain traits he possesses.
Situationism
situation determines who becomes leader.
Interactional approach
both traits and situation are of influence of who becomes leader.
great leader theory
successful leaders possess certain characteristics that
mark them for greatness.
Zeitgeist theory
history is determined primarily by the “spirit of times”
rather than by the actions and choices of great leaders.
Reciprocal relationships
base predictions of leadership on bidirectional
relationships among leader, followers, and the nature of the group situation.
Competencies associated with leadership emergence:
The babble effect
group members who talk at a high rate in the group are tended to emerge as group leaders, even if the shared information is of low quality.
Theories about the emergence of leadership:
Lord: implicit leadership theory
individuals’ beliefs about what qualities they expect in a
leader influence their perceptual and cognitive reactions to leaders and potential leaders.
-Can cause Warren Harding effect = thinking someone is suited, even though he
isn’t.
Hogg: social identity theory
we choose a leader that shares the same social identity.
Eagly: social role theory
stereotypes of sex roles and leadership roles can create negative expectations for women leaders.
Terror management theory
individuals have a deep-seated need for leaders, especially in times of crisis, when mortality is very noticeable.
Evolutionary theory
leadership is an evolutionary adaption that improves the fitness of
both leaders and followers.
Warren Harding effect
thinking someone is suited to lead, even though he
isn’t.
Fiedler: contingency theory
leadership effectiveness is determined by: (1) The leader’s motivational style (task motivated / relationship motivated), and (2) The favourability of the
situation (determined by leader-member relations, task structure, and leader’s power)
Least Preferred Co-Worker (LPC) Scale
measures the degree of a leader being task
motivated or relationship motivated > High score = relation motivated, Low score = task motivated.
- Task motivated (low-LPC): leader will be most effective in situations that are
either extremely unfavourable or extremely favourable.
- Relationship motivated (high-LPC): leader will be most effective in
intermediate situations.
Leadership style theorists: effectiveness depends on the leader’s task and relationship
behaviors:
-Blake & Mouton: The Leadership Grid = people vary in their concern for results and
their concern for people and that individuals who are high on both dimensions (9,9)
are the best leaders.
Blake & Mouton: The Leadership Grid
people vary in their concern for results and
their concern for people and that individuals who are high on both dimensions (9,9)
are the best leaders.