Working Memory Model
Working Memory Model - Central Executive
Working Memory Model - Phonological Loop
Working Memory Model - Visuo-Spatial Sketchpad
Working Memory Model - Episodic Buffer
Working Memory Model - Predictions
Working Memory Model - Evaluation - Strenghts
Working Memory Model - Evaluation - Limitations
Baddeley & Hitch (1976)
Hypothesis:
- When pps perform two different tasks that require
resources from the same compoennt of WM they will
need more time compared to when they perform two
tasks that require resources from two different
components
Pps:
- 12 university students
Procedure:
- All participants took part in all different conditions of
this experiment (repeated measures design)
- 32 different verbal reasoning tasks were given to the
pps
- in the format “F follows K:FK”
- the sentence was either
- true or false
- affirmative or negative
- active or passive
- verb “follow” or “proceed”
- All sentences occured in random order and equally
often
- The pps were to press a button if it fir the description
(“yes”) or not (“no”)
- 4 conditions
- pps repeated the word “the” while solving the verbal
reason task
- pps repeated “1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6”
- pps repeated a random sequence of numbers
- control condition
- The conditions were given in a random order for each
pps
- The time taken to hit the button was recorded
Results
- Latencies were shortest for the control condition and
longest for the condition with a random sequence of
numbers
- Latencies were shorter for the “the” conditions than the
“1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6” condition