What are the two questions asked?
Can V consent to the crime?
Did V really consent to the crime?
Can V consent to Assault and Battery?
Yes, R v Slingsby
Can V consent to Murder?
No, Pretty v UK
Can V consent to section 18 GBH/Wounding ?
No, R v Leach. Too close to attempted murder
Can V consent to S20 and S47?
No, R v Brown and others. 4 EXCEPTIONS
1st Exception to S20 and S47
PROPERLY CONDUCTED games and sports. However have to stay within the rules of the game
2nd Exception to S20 and S47
ROUGH HORSEPLAY. D Cannot intend to cause ANY harm. Aitken. Drunken and mistaken beliefs can be a defence to horseplay
What are the 4 exceptions to S20 and S47?
3rd Exception to S20 and S47
R v Wilson. Consensual within marriage, and requested by V.
4th Exception to S20 and S47
Medical treatment e.g. surgery provided V has given true consent to the medical activity and knows the risks involved
What is the main case for DID V really consent?
R v Olugboja, there must be a presence of yes rather than an absence of no.
What are the 3 things to consider if V actually consented?
V must be capable of consenting case
Gillick. A person has capacity to consent if they are ‘Gillick competent’. V must have sufficient maturity, intelligence and understanding of the nature and consequence of what they are consenting to.
Consent from V must be genuine case
R v Newland. If D lies to V/Deceives V about his/her identity, this will negate V’s consent.
Consent can be implied from V
Consent when taking part in an activity e.g. contact at a party or a crowded tube