Front
Back
To what extent do conservatives disagree on human nature?
Imperfect; atomism vs community; human potential; Overall thesis: some agreement on imperfection but deeper disagreements about how human nature functions outweigh this
To what extent do conservatives disagree on human nature? - Imperfect - Agree
Traditional Conservative: humans are imperfect Hobbes- state of nature is ‘perpetual and restless desire for power’- suggests a fundamental moral imperfection, along with belief in psychological and
One Nation: humans are imperfect Disraeli’s belief in patriotism points to psychological imperfection- humanity searches for security in groups- community and nation ‘two nations […] no intercourse and no sympathy’- Disraeli
To what extent do conservatives disagree on human nature? - Imperfect - Disagree
Traditional Conservative: humans are imperfect Hobbes- state of nature is ‘perpetual and restless desire for power’- suggests a fundamental moral imperfection, along with belief in psychological and
One Nation: humans are imperfect Disraeli’s belief in patriotism points to psychological imperfection- humanity searches for security in groups- community and nation ‘two nations […] no intercourse and no sympathy’- Disraeli
To what extent do conservatives disagree on human nature? - Atomism vs community - Agree
Traditional Conservative: society forms naturally, like a family or a body ‘love the little platoons’- harmony between different classes, Burke
New Right: natural atomism of man- idea of conforming to societal norms as limiting to freedom Ayn Rand- “each man is an end in himself, not a means to the ends of others”
To what extent do conservatives disagree on human nature? - Atomism vs community - Disagree
Traditional Conservative: society forms naturally, like a family or a body ‘love the little platoons’- harmony between different classes, Burke
New Right: natural atomism of man- idea of conforming to societal norms as limiting to freedom Ayn Rand- “each man is an end in himself, not a means to the ends of others”
To what extent do conservatives disagree on human nature? - Human potential - Agree
Traditional Conservative: prefer stability and tradition due to humans’ lack of potential and inability to see the world clearly Oakeshott- ‘to be conservative is to prefer the familiar to the unknown’
New Right: Ayn Rand- people need to be free so they can fulfil their potential Atlas Shrugged portrays the importance of individual thinking to create innovation - ‘exist for his own sake’
To what extent do conservatives disagree on human nature? - Human potential - Disagree
Traditional Conservative: prefer stability and tradition due to humans’ lack of potential and inability to see the world clearly Oakeshott- ‘to be conservative is to prefer the familiar to the unknown’
New Right: Ayn Rand- people need to be free so they can fulfil their potential Atlas Shrugged portrays the importance of individual thinking to create innovation - ‘exist for his own sake’
To what extent do conservatives agree on the state?
state is necessary; pragmatic vs ideological; how strong is the state; Overall thesis: surface agreement but deeper functional disagreements
To what extent do conservatives agree on the state? - State necessary - Agree
Traditional Conservative: Suggests that the state is needed to maintain security in society ‘keep afloat on an even keel’- ultimate aim is peace and harmony, not abstract reforms
New Right: minimal state necessary Nozick ‘protection against force, theft, fraud, enforcement of contracts and so on’
To what extent do conservatives agree on the state? - State necessary - Disagree
Traditional Conservative: Suggests that the state is needed to maintain security in society ‘keep afloat on an even keel’- ultimate aim is peace and harmony, not abstract reforms
New Right: minimal state necessary Nozick ‘protection against force, theft, fraud, enforcement of contracts and so on’
To what extent do conservatives agree on the state? - Pragmatic vs ideological - Agree
Traditional Conservative: pragmatic- inherit Trad Con views on this, favour stability over dogmatism as they value security and harmony Disraeli ultimately wanted to please the people in order to maintain harmony ‘the palace is not safe when the cottage is not happy’
New Right: ideological neoliberal Rand’s labelling of objectivism as a ‘philosophy for living on earth’- suggests that this is key to stick to and there is little room for shifting on fundamental beliefs in freedom
To what extent do conservatives agree on the state? - Pragmatic vs ideological - Disagree
Traditional Conservative: pragmatic- inherit Trad Con views on this, favour stability over dogmatism as they value security and harmony Disraeli ultimately wanted to please the people in order to maintain harmony ‘the palace is not safe when the cottage is not happy’
New Right: ideological neoliberal Rand’s labelling of objectivism as a ‘philosophy for living on earth’- suggests that this is key to stick to and there is little room for shifting on fundamental beliefs in freedom
To what extent do conservatives agree on the state? - Strength of state - Agree
Traditional Conservative: Trad con strong- belief that humans are flawed so cannot make the best choices for themselves Hobbes’ Leviathan implies that a strong monarch is needed to combat human imperfection state of nature is ‘nasty, brutish and short’
New Right: neoliberal weak- emphasis on individual freedom due to a differing belief on human imperfection Nozick’s idea that taxation is ‘legalised slavery’ as it is ‘forced labour’ for someone elses’ gain- emphasis on minimal state
To what extent do conservatives agree on the state? - Strength of state - Disagree
Traditional Conservative: Trad con strong- belief that humans are flawed so cannot make the best choices for themselves Hobbes’ Leviathan implies that a strong monarch is needed to combat human imperfection state of nature is ‘nasty, brutish and short’
New Right: neoliberal weak- emphasis on individual freedom due to a differing belief on human imperfection Nozick’s idea that taxation is ‘legalised slavery’ as it is ‘forced labour’ for someone elses’ gain- emphasis on minimal state
Front
Back
To what extent are conservatives united in their views on society?
organic; atomistic vs organic/community; hierarchy; Overall thesis: key disagreements on society outweigh limited agreement on hierarchy
To what extent are conservatives united in their views on society? - Organic - Agree
Traditional Conservative: Society forms naturally and should not be meddled with in any grand ways Oakeshott believes in trying to ‘keep afloat on an even keel’
New Right: thinks that the idea of organic society is limiting to individual freedom Rand argues for the ‘virtue of selfishness’
To what extent are conservatives united in their views on society? - Organic - Disagree
Traditional Conservative: Society forms naturally and should not be meddled with in any grand ways Oakeshott believes in trying to ‘keep afloat on an even keel’
New Right: thinks that the idea of organic society is limiting to individual freedom Rand argues for the ‘virtue of selfishness’
To what extent are conservatives united in their views on society? - Atomistic vs organic/community - Agree
Traditional Conservative: society forms naturally, like a family or a body ‘love the little platoons’- harmony between different classes, Burke
New Right: neoliberals believe in an atomised society where people do not sacrifice individuality for greater societal aims Ayn rand ‘each man is an end in himself, not just a means for others
To what extent are conservatives united in their views on society? - Atomistic vs organic/community - Disagree
Traditional Conservative: society forms naturally, like a family or a body ‘love the little platoons’- harmony between different classes, Burke
New Right: neoliberals believe in an atomised society where people do not sacrifice individuality for greater societal aims Ayn rand ‘each man is an end in himself, not just a means for others
To what extent are conservatives united in their views on society? - Hierarchy - Agree
Traditional Conservative: hierarchy because aristocracy is naturally in place ‘wiser, stronger and more opulent’ are at the top, they are ‘born to rule’ - Burke
One Nation: hierarchy because naturally more fortunate also have social responsibilities- noblesse oblige ‘two nations […] no intercourse and no sympathy’- Disraeli
To what extent are conservatives united in their views on society? - Hierarchy - Disagree
Traditional Conservative: hierarchy because aristocracy is naturally in place ‘wiser, stronger and more opulent’ are at the top, they are ‘born to rule’ - Burke
One Nation: hierarchy because naturally more fortunate also have social responsibilities- noblesse oblige ‘two nations […] no intercourse and no sympathy’- Disraeli