ISSUES CHECKLIST - 6
STANDING
Individual Standing
Fr stndng, a P mst shw (1) i-i-f (concrete and partic; fr injunc or dec relief, satsfied if imminent) (2) csd by allgd unlwfl gov actn, and (3) redressability (likely, as opposed to speculative, a favrble ct decsion will elim the injury).
STANDING
Organization Standing
An org may bring an action of behalf of its members if (1) its members have standing, (2) the interests at stake are germane to the org’s purpose, and (3) neither the claim asserted nor relief requested req individ members’ part in the lawsuit.
STANDING
Taxpayer Standing - A fed taxpayer has standing….
Third Party Standing - 3P standing is allowed
Taxpayer Stndng: A fed taxpayer hs stndng to challenge a measure (1) enctd u/ Con’ T and S pwer (2) tht exceeds some specific limit on the pwer. The Est Clse is only limit on th pwer. H,T
3P Standing is allowed whn (1) a 3P is unable to assert its own rights, and (2) a P w/ standing (a) has a close r/ship with the 3P, or (b) suffers an injury that adversely affects the P’s r/ship w/ th 3P resulting in an indirect violation of 3P’s rights. H,T
STANDING
Mootness
Ripeness
Advisory Opinion
Mootness: There must be a live controversy at all review stages. H,T
Ripeness: Ripnss refers to readiness of case for lit. A FC will nt consider a claim b4 it ful dvlps; to do so is prem, and any potntial injury speculative. H,T
Advisory Opinion: A FC may not render AOs on th cx’ality of proposed action or leg, bt may grant a dec j/ment whn th challngd action poses a real and immediate danger to a party’s interests. H,T
STATE ACTION
The Cx only prohibits govtal infringement of cx rights, so P must prove there was state action. This occurs when the action performed is one that is a traditional public function, or the govt is heavily entangled in the action.
10th AMENDMENT
The 10A prvds pwrs nt grntd to th fed gov or prhbtd to th states are reserved to the states. Congress cannot compel states to implement specific state legislation.
H, Congress did not intrude into an area left to the states under the 10A b/c [Reg] was within Congress’ enumerated power to [regulate ISC / tax and spend]. Thus, there was no 10A violation.
SUPREMACY CLAUSE
If fed law preempts …
If fed law preempts state lw, th state lw will be invalid u/ the Sup Clause. The USCx and fed laws made pursuant to it are the supreme laws of the land and may either expressly or impliedly preempt local laws.
Fed law exprssly preempts state lw whn (1) the Cx makes fed pwer exclusive, or (2) Congss encts leg’n explicitly prohbtng state regualtion in the area.H,T
A fed law impliedly preempts a statte if (1) fed and state laws are mutually excl, (2) state law impeds the obj’s of fed law, or (3) Congss evidnces a clear intent to preempt the field.
11th AMENDMENT
The 11A prohibits…
The 11A prohibits FCs from hearing a private party’s claims against a state govt. Actions cn be brought against [state officers to enjoin future conduct that violates the US Cx or fed law].
DELEGATION OF LEGISLATIVE POWER
Because…
B/c Congress is vested by Art I with “all leg powers”, it may not delegate that power to any other branch of govt., but delegation of some of Congress’ authority to the Exec branch has been held cx’l sla Congress specifies an “intelligble principle” to guide the delegation.
<em>H, Congress authorized _ to carry out a statute “…”. This delegation was valid b/c each of the regulations was an intelligble standard. Thus, valid delegation of legislative power.</em>
TAXING AND SPENDING POWER
Congress has the power to T and S for the general welfare, and to condition states’ receipt of fed funds sla the condition is related to the purpose for which the funds are granted.
H, the purpose of the federal funds are to… [implementing seatbelts improved highway safety]. [Regulation]’s condition on states’ receipt of funds was related to the purpose of the federal funds. Thus, the Regulation was within Congress’ enumerated powers.
COMMERCE CLAUSE
then, only if applicable (ie state acting):
DCC
(1) Discriminatory
(2) Unduly Burden ISC
* When there is a DCC issue, see if facts also tirgger Privileges and Immunities issue, especially when a regulation involves a state discriminating against other states.*
Cngrss may exrcise pwers spcfclly enmrtd by USCx. The CC empwrs Cngrss to reglte foreign and ISC. Cngrss hs pwer to reglte (1) channels, (2) instrumntlities and (3) any activity that substntially affects ISC, prvdd reg does nt infringe any cx right.
[W/ rspct to ecnmc actvties, ala ct cn imagine a RB for cncldng the total incidence of th activity in the aggregte substntially affects ISC, Cngress cn regulte small pieces of th total.]H,T
DCC A state may regulate an area of ISC if Cngrss has nt enctd laws sla its statutes do nt (1) discrim against o-o-s commerce, or (2) unduly burden ISC.
(1) A state law discriminates agnst o-of-s comp if it protects local ecnmc intrsts at the expnse of o-of-s comp. If a statte is discrim, the statte may be valid if (1) it furthers an imprtant nonecnmc state intrst, and (2) there are no reas nondiscrim alternatives.H,T
[Exc: Market Partic]: A state may prefer its own citizens whn acting as a mp. H,T
[Exc: Trad Govt Function]: A reg relating to a state perfrmng a trad govt function is valid. H,T
(2) Unduly Burden ISC (only do if no discrimination) A nondiscrim state law may be invlid if the burdns on ISC outweigh the promotion of legit state intrst. In balancing the state law objective against the burden on ISC, cts consider whthr thre are less-restrictive alternatives.H,T
In conclusion,
DUE PROCESS
The DPC…
Procedural Due Process
When govt action…
The DPC [5/14] prvds th gov shall nt tke an indiv’s L,L, or P w/out DP of the law.
DUE PROCESS
Substantive Due Process
The SDP clause guarntees th fairness of lw and tht lws will be reas and nt arbitrary. If a fund right is involved, the ct applies SS; If no fund right is involved, th ct applies RB.
EQUAL PROTECTION
EPC/DPC prvids all prsns are enttled to EP of th laws. EP iss arse whn gov trts sim situtd indvdls dffrntly bsd classf amng indvduals.
Free Exercise Clause
The FEC prohibits …
The FEC prhbts th govt frm interfring w/ the exercise of rel. Gov intrfrnce in rel dpnds on whthr it invlves rel (1) B, or (2) C. Laws designed to intrfere with rel must meet SS.
(1) B: The frdm to belve in any rel or nne at all is absltly protctd and cnnt be restricted by law. The gov may nt deny benfits or impose burdns based on rel beliefs. H,T
(2) C: Rel cndct is not absltly prtctd. Gnrly, lws tht intntionlly targt rel cndct b/c it is rel’ly motivated or displays rel Bs are sbjct to SS. Neutral laws of general app tht have the incidental effect of intrfering with one’s ability to engage in rel conduct are subject to RB. H, intntionlly targeted b/c. U/ SS, Gov had compelling interest.. Law was not lrm to achieve b/c. Thus, would nt hav passed SS.
* H, law was generally applicable b/c… (apply rb). Thus, unlikely SC wld overcome RB.*
FREEDOM OF RELIGION
Establishment Clause
The Est Clause prohibits…
The EC prohibits the govt from establishing a rel or endorsing / supporting a rel. When a govt program prefers one rel over another, or r over n-r, SS applies. <em>H, (apply SS if did have preference, if not, Thus “there was no sect preference”). </em>
U/ th Lemn Tst, a lw tht hs sme r/ship to rel bt does nt discrim against rel will be uphld if
(1) it hs seculr prpse, (2) its prmry effct does nt advnce or inhibit rel (incidntl effcts allwd), and (3) it does nt excssvly entngle th gov w/ rel.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
1A (14A) - Freedom of Speech
The 1A (14A) reqs the govt to not interefere with the FoS. H
Limits Govt is ltd in hw it reglts spch. Spch reg mst nt be PROVUD.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
If govt reglts spch content, reg is sbjct to SS. CN spch regs are sbjct to IS.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Govs abilty to regulte T,P,M of spch varies w/ forum in whch spch takes place.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Protected spch incl symbolic spch (expressive conduct). Govt reg of symbolic spch is upheld if
(1) the reg is w/in govt’s pwr to enact (eg, police power),
(2) furthers an IGI, (3) unrelated to supressing ideas, and
(4) burdens speech no greater than nec. H,T
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
[Commercial Speech]
[Government Employees]
Commercial Spch: Th 1A prtcts comm spch that is truthful, nt misleading, and concerns lawful activity. Reg of comm spch is permissible whn th reg (1) serves a sub gov intrst, (2) advncs tht intrst dirctly, & (3) is narrwly tailrd to serve tht intrst. <em>H, [P] engaged in comm spch b/c [_]. No facts indicated the [flyer/ad] was nt truthful, misleading, and did not concern lawful activitiy. </em>(one sentence on each element).
Govt Employee: Term. or penalizing a gov e’ee for spch invlving a pblic concrn made outside of e’ment as a citizen is sbjct to SS. Spch an e’ee makes to fulfill a job responsibility receives no 1A prtction.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Unprotected Speech
Defamation … (in Torts outline)
Obscenity, a form of unprotected spch, can be regulated, based on content. To be considered obscene, the av person, applying contemporary community standards, mst find the material, taken as a whole (1) appeals to the purient interest, (2) depicits sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and (3) lacks serious political, artistic, literary, or scientific value.H,T
Incitement to Violence The govt may forbid spch that (1) creates a clear and present danger of immintent lawless action if (2) a call to violence uses language calculated to incite unlawful action.H,T
A speaker may be criminally punished for using fighting words. Annoying or offensive words are not fighting words. H,T
FIFTH AMENDMENT - TAKINGS CLAUSE
The 5 TC (14A), prohbts gov frm (1) tak (2) pp (3) for pu (4) w/out jc.