What is the issues checklist?
5 C’s + F.O.R.
A Client Loves Fierce Counsel, Courts Feel Differently
8. Regulatory Controls
A-C Relationship
Formation:
Scope: Gnrly, a C controls the objec of rep, & makes substantive decisions (incl. whether to accept a settlement offer, plead guilty, testify, or waive a jury trial in criminal matters). The L controls the means (tactical decisions) to accomplish those objectives, BUT mst consult w/ C as to means by which objectives are pursued.
Assisting in violation of law: Cannot counsel C to commit C,F or other violation. H/e can discuss the consequences.
A L has a DoL to his C that requires the L to put the interests of his C above all other interest and to avoid any conflicts.
Conflict of Interest
PCOI exists whn L suspects a CC, bt rep hs nt yet been ML. A CC exists whn a rep is (1) DA to another C, or (2) ML by resp to PC/FC/3P/L’s own intrsts.
ABA = no IWC for PCOI. In CA, w/out the IWC of each C, a L may nt rep more thn 1 C in a matter in whch the C’s intrsts pot cnflict.
U/ ABA, L mst nt rep a C if rep is (1) DA, or (2) ML by resp to P/FC/3P/L’s own intrsts UNLESS
(a) L reas believes able to prvde c&d rep to each affected C,
(b) rep not prohib by law,
(c) rep does nt involve 2 pties on opp sdes of same lit, &
(d) each C gives ICinW.
CA rule similar to ABA rule, but does not have the “reas believes” req.
Conflicts of Interest
Despite actual CoI’s, a L may represent a C if
CA law similar but does nt hve “reas believes” requirement.
[In crim case, even when all D’s waive CoI claims, the trial ct can still prohibit joint rep]. H,T
Joint Representation
Duty of Candor to the Tribunal
U/ ABA, L is prhbtd frm knowingly offering false ev. CA law req L to employ only means consistent w/ th truth, and never seek to mislead any judicial officer by a false statement of fact or law.
II. Confidentiality
A. Duty of Confidentiality
B. Attorney-Client Privilege & Waiver
C. Work Product Doctrine
D. Representation of Multiple Clients
The a-c privilege prohibits a ct or govt tribunal from compelling the revelation of conf comms b/w an A & a C if subject of the comm concerns legal advice.
The presence of a 3P will not destroy confidentiality IF the 3P is present to help further the a-c relationship.
When the Client is a Corp, the privilege covers communications between the Lawyer and a high-ranking corporate official.
Waiver - The A-C privilege exists for the benefit of the C not the L. The C is the privilege holder, & may waive the privilege. The L may assert the priivlege on the C’s behalf.
Conflict of Interest
A L must not represent a C in a matter in which the (1) L participated substantially, and (2) any attorney at the former firm has confidential, material info, unless the former C gives informed, written consent. H,T
II. Confidentiality
A. Duty of Confidentiality
B. Attorney-Client Privilege
C. Work Product Doctrine
D. Representation of Multiple Clients
Material a L prepares for litigation is immune from discovery or compelled disclosures, UNLESS the opp shows a sub need and an inability to gather the material w/out undue hardship.
A L’s mental impressions or opinions are immune from discovery or compelled disclosures regardless of the opposition’s need, unless the immunity is waived.
Conflict of Interest
Imputed Disqualification
If 1 L employed by a firm is unable to rep b/c of a CoI or conf issue with a former C, the disqual is imputed to the entire firm and no L in the firm may rep the C. H,T
If a Former Govt L is prohibited from rep’ing a C, the F may rep a C against the govt if (1) the FGL is screened from part, (2) not apportioned fees, and (3) prompt written notice is given to govt so govt takes preventative measures. H,T
Former C and Former Firm: If a L is prohibited from rep’ing a C based on duties to a former C and former firm ass., other firm Ls will not be precluded from representing the C if (1) disqualified L is screened from participation, (2) not apportioned fees, (3) prompt written notice is given to any affected former C, and (4) certification of compliance with these rules and the screening procedures are provided to any affected former C upon written request and termination of the screen procedures. H,T
Prsnl Intrst: If a L is prhbtd frm rep’ing a C bsd upn a prsnl intrst, other F Ls will nt be prcldd frm rep’ing th C if th prohib L’s disqual does nt mat limit th remaining F Ls’ rep of th C. H,T
Client Waiver: A C may waive an imptd disqual if (1) the L reas bel s/he will be able to prvde comp and dil rep to each affected C, (2) rep is nt prohib by law, (3) rep does nt involve assertion of a claim by one C against another C rep’d by the same L, and (4) each C gives ICinW. [CA law similar, but does not have the “reas believes” req]. H,T
A L should not counsel acts that may subject a C to liability w/out a GF belief that such decision is in the C’s best intrst.
Conflict of Interest
Prop as Payment for Services: Under ABA, a L may receive prop as a payment for services, ala the payment does not involve acquiring a proprietary interest in a litigation sm. H,T
Proprietary Interest: Under ABA, except for liens to collect a fee, a L may not obtain a proprietary interest in a litigation sm. H,T
Attorneys Fees
Property as Payment for Services
Under ABA, a L may receive property as a payment for services, ala the payment does not involve acquiring a proprietary interest in a litigation subject matter. H,T
Fees Collection
Under ABA/CA laws, a L may collect a fee by taking an interest-bearing promissory note, or obtaining a lien upon a potential recovery to secure the fee payment, provided the L complies with rule of prof. conduct relating to bus transaction with Cs. H,T
Fees Collection: Under ABA/CA laws, a L may collect a fee by taking an interest-bearing promissory note, or obtaining a lien upon a potential recovery to secure the fee payment, provided the L complies with the rules of prof. conduct relating to bus transcations with Cs. H,T
Business Transaction with a C: U/ ABA, a fee paid in prop hs the essential qualities of a bus transaction with a C. U/ ABA/CA laws, a L shall nt enter into a bus trans w/ a C, or knowingly acquire an o/ship, possessory, security, or other pecuniary interest adverse to a C, UNLESS:
(1) trans or acquisition and its terms are fair and reas to C and fully disclosed in writing in manner whch C shld reas have understood,
(2) C is advised in writing C may seek advice of an indep L and is given reas opp to do so,
(3) C consents in writing to the trans or acquisition and its terms. H,T
Exception - A L may enter into standard commercial trans that the C regularly provides to others. H,T
Attorneys Fees
Expense Advances and Loans
U/ [B], a L may advance ct costs and other lit expenses, the repayment of which may be contingent on the outcome. U/ U/ [B], a L may pay ct costs and lit expenses on behalf of indigent C.
ABA does not require a written a/ment to advance expenses.
In CA, a written fee a/ment must incl. (1) basis of compensation, incl. hrly rates, statutory fees, and other charges, (2) general nature of the legal services provided, and (3) L and C contractual responsibilities. H,T
U/ ABA, a L must not rep a C in a matter in which the L participated personally and substantially as a govt officer or employee, unless the appropriate govt agency gives IWC, except as permitted by law. [In CA, a former crim prosecutor may not participate on the defense of the same case.] H,T
3P Payor Rule: A L must not accept compensation from a 3P for rep’ing a C unless (1) C gives I,WC, (2) 3P does not interfere with the Ls independence or the C rep, and (3) arrangement does not compromise the C’s conf info. H,T
Organizational Cs: A L mst act in the best interest of the entity.
A L cannot limit liability whn entering into a L-C r/ship. The ABA allows limits on liability if C is rep’d by other independent legal counsel whn a/ment was made.
In CA, a L cannot limit malprac liability even if work is pro bono.
A L may only settle a malpractice suit with a C after providing the C with written advice to consult outside indep legal counsel and giving C opp to do so.
A L shall not solicit substantial gifts from Cs or draft a legal instrument (will, trust or deed) for a C that will give the L (or a prsn related to the L) a substantial gift UNLESS the L and C are related.
U/ [B], a L cannot during trial assert p.k. of facts in issue other than when testifying as a W or state a personal opinion at to the W’s credibility.
U/ [B], a L shall nt act as an advocate at a trial in which the L is likely to be a necessary W, unless
[In CA, law is the same as ABA for jury trials w/out exception #(3). In lieu of exception (3), CA allows rep if a L obtains C’s IWC]. H,T
U/ ABA, a L may nt hve sexual relations w/ a C unless a consensual r/ship existed whn the C-L r/ship commenced. H,T
In 2018, Cal updated its rule on sexual relations with a C to align with the ABA. CA now imposes a strict prohibition on sexual relations with a current C who is not a spouse or registered domestic partner, unless a consensual sexual r/ship exists b/w them when the A-C r/ship commences. H,T
II. Confidentiality
A. Duty of Confidentiality
B. Attorney-Client Privilege
C. Work Product Doctrine
D. Representation of Multiple Clients
U/ [B], a L mst not gnrly reveal any info relating to the rep of a C. Exceptions permit a L to reveal conf info relating to the rep of a C when: