How will the costs judge approach a detailed assessment when deciding costs on the indemnity basis?
The costs judge will consider whether the costs were reasonably incurred and reasonable in amount. Any doubt will be resolved in favour of the receiving party.
Requirements for a Part 36 offer
for road traffic cases occurring after 31 May 2021, the value of the damages claimed for the pain, suffering and loss of amenity aspect of the claim must not exceed
£5,000
How the parties are referenced re costs?
paying party / receiving party
general rule on costs
the unsuccessful party pays the successful party’s costs
Small claims track - costs
legal costs are not recoverable and so the costs payable will only relate to disbursements
Fast and intermediate track - costs
fixed costs apply
Multi-track - costs
a detailed assessment of the costs will be carried out
Benefit of fixed costs
know in advance how much will have to be paid to the other party should they lose the case
Why are fixed costs less attractive to the successful party?
they are extremely unlikely to recover all their costs and will often have to pay the shortfall to their own solicitor.
On fast and intermediate tracks, disbursements may be allowed if
reasonably incurred
Although parties can make applications for costs greater than the fixed recoverable costs, these would be ordered only in
‘exceptional circumstances’
How/when will the receiving party initiate detailed assessment?
Within 3 months of the date of the judgment/order, the receiving party must serve on the paying party a notice of commencement of detailed assessment proceedings, together with their bill of costs and evidence in support, such as receipts
Factors that the court should consider when assessing costs on multi-track
(a) conduct of the parties and efforts made to resolve/settle;
(b) value of any money or property involved;
(c) importance of the matter to the parties;
(d) complexity;
(e) the skill, effort, specialised knowledge and responsibility involved;
(f) time spent on the case;
(g) place and circumstances in which the work was done; and
(h) the receiving party’s last approved or agreed budget.
Costs awarded on the standard basis must be proportionate to
the matters in issue e.g. bear a reasonable relationship to the sums in issue, the value of any non-monetary relief in issue, the complexity of the litigation, any additional work generated by the conduct of the paying party and any wider factors.
When calculating costs on the standard basis, any doubt is resolved in favour of the
paying party
When calculating costs on the indemnity basis, any doubt is resolved in favour of the
receiving party
2-stage approach to calculating costs on standard basis
(1) judge goes through bill line-by-line
- any costs that are unreasonably incurred or disproportionate are DISALLOWED
(2) Proportionality assessed
- if proportionate, no further assessment;
- if disproportionate, judge makes further reductions.
What is the court’s approach to costs?
somewhat forceful - they seek to enforce the overriding objective that litigation must be conducted at proportionate cost
Costs awarded on the indemnity basis must be
reasonably incurred and reasonable in amount.
Factors the court should consider when exercising its discretionary power to make a non-party costs order
Before a non-party costs order can be made, the third party must be
added as a party to the proceedings and may attend the hearing when the court determines the issue of costs
For fixed costs, how can a party be punished if found to have behaved unreasonably?
the court could order that the amount of fixed recoverable costs payable is increased by 50% (eg up to 150%)
When must the claimant serve a Notice of Commencement of detailed assessment proceedings upon the defendant?
Within 3 months of the date of the judgment.