Why NPV is better than IRR
NPV looks at absolute increases in wealth and thus can be used to compare projects of different sizes. IRR looks at relative rates of return and doesn’t take into account relative size of the project
In situations involving multiple reversals in project cash flows, it is possible that the IRR method may produce multiple IRRs (that is, there can be more than one interest rate which would produce an NPV of zero). Affects decision-making
NPV links to shareholder wealth whilst IRR only calculates the rate of return on projects
NPV can be used in situations where the cost of capital changes from year to year. In IRR, it’s difficult to know what to compare cost of capital with
How may capital rationing issues be overcome
Obtain information about available sources of finance, since SMEs may lack understanding in this area
Wealthy individuals or groups of investors who invest directly in the company and who are prepared to take higher risks in the hope of higher returns
Grant aid from a government, national or regional source which could be linked to a specific business area
When can real-terms inflation be used?
Must be a single rate of inflation affecting all of the project’s cash flows
The single rate of inflation affecting the cash flows must also be the same as the general rate of inflation suffered by investors
Apply the specific rates of inflation to sales, material costs and other cash flows and ensure the cash flows in the appraisal incorporate these
The uncertainty surrounding the rates of inflation that Crocket Co faces with this project will certainly make an appraisal in nominal-terms more difficult to prepare
Why is DCF better than non-DCF
They allow for TVM and recognise that a $ received today is worth than a $ received in one year’s time
DCF is cash flow based rather than profit based. So won’t be affected by accounting policies
DCF investment appraisal methods consider cash flows over the whole life of an investment project, whereas payback ignores cash flows after the payback period
DCF Disadvantages
The potentially complex and time-consuming process of calculating NPV or IRR
The complexity of estimating an appropriate discount rate (i.e. the applicable interest rate), particularly for unquoted companies
Difficulty in explaining DCF methods to non-financial managers
Issue with ARR
Based upon accounting profit and ignores cash flow
Arbitrarily set targets based upon internal corporate targets
Sensitivity Analysis Advantages
It gives an idea of how sensitive the project is to changes in each of the original estimates
It prompts management to check the quality of data for the most sensitive variables
It identifies thecritical success factorsfor the project and directs project management
Sensitivity Analysis Disadvantages
Doesn’t take into account probabilities occuring
Involves isolating the impact of each variable on the outcome
Doesn’t provide an indication of whether to undertake a project
Advantages Probability Analysis
How likely it is that outcomes will occur which will change the decision
Allow for more than one variable changing by combining their probabilities
Calculate the expected NPV of the project, which can provide the decision-maker with a simple decision to go ahead if the expected NPV is positive
Payback advantage
Advantage: Uses cash flows, indicates when the investment will break even and whether this is before projected cash flows become very uncertain
It is simple to calculate and it is easy to understand
Payback disadvantages
Disadvantage: Payback period ignores cash flows after the payback period. The payback target is subjective
Disadvantage: Using payback to compare investments may result in choosing shorter-term investments giving immediate returns, rather than investments offering greater returns in the longer term
ROCE advantages
Advantage: The ROCE method may reflect the wishes of shareholders that the company generates sufficient profits and does consider the entire life of the investment
Advantage: As ROCE is a percentage measure, it can be used to compare this investment with other options
ROCE disadvantages
Disadvantage: Doesn’t take into account the TVM
Disadvantage: An investment which increases company value will be rejected if its ROCE is below the target ROCE
Lease instead of Buy
Leases offer more flexibility than buying. If technology changes so the asset is out-of-date, the lessee does not have to keep on using it
Lessee may not have enough cash to pay for the vehicle and might have difficulty in obtaining a bank loan
The cash flows of leasing and buying generally last over the life of the project, discounted cash flow techniques should be used. Means TVM should be used
Cash flows of the lease that will be relevant are the lease payments themselves and the tax savings that these lease payments will lead to
NPV affect if real-term inflation used?
Real cash flows would need to be discounted using real cost of capital not nominal cost of capital
The effects of general inflation are excluded
Simulation Benefits
Specify the variables, specify the relationship between the variables, run the siimulation, analyse the results
More real-world, as it is unlikely a single variable will change in isolation
Shows the full range of possible outcomes, enabling further mathematical analysis
Simulation Disadvantages
It can be very time-consuming without a computer
Monte Carlo simulation is not a technique for making a decision, only for obtaining more information about the possible outcomes
Limitation of Probability Analysis
Probability estimation requires historic data of the event frequency to give any unreliability to the figures
A company’s attitude to risk is ignored in its decision
An expected value is essentially a long-run average over a sufficiently high number of repetitions and consequently may not be a possible outcome
Projects with Significantly different Business Risk to Current Operations
Proposed investment project has business risk that is significantly different from current operations, it is no longer appropriate to use theweighted average cost of capital (WACC)
Where business risk changes significantly, the capital asset pricing model should be used to calculate a project-specific discount rate
WACC can only be used as a discount ratewhere business risk and financial risk are not significantly affected by undertaking an investment project
CAPM (use)
The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) can provide a project-specific discount rate
CAPM (beta)
CAPM uses a beta that represents the systematic risk of a project and of the company undertaking the project to find a risk-adjusted cost of equity for use in discounting
CAPM (proxy company)
selecting a proxy company with similar business activities to a proposed investment project
CAPM (ungearing)
ungearing the proxy company equity beta to give an asset beta which does not reflect the proxy company financial risk
CAPM (regearing)
regearing the asset beta to give an equity beta which reflects the financial risk of the investing company