Why plan evaluation?
In order to critically evaluate what is planned. To create the best/most accurate plan
Advantages of DVHs
Limitations of DVH
Too much information may be provided and it becomes difficult to assess the overall clinical effect of the dose distribution
How DVHs have altered the way in which we view treatment planning compared to 2-D plan evaluation
2D uses: - Isodose distribution - Max / Min / Mean values (ICRU 50) - Dose profiles Integral dose It is useless for other slices
DVH uses volume vs absolute/relative dose to compare dose distribution throughout organs
How reliable are DVHs as a plan evaluation tool?
Assists but should be used in conjunction with traffic light system (score card) as it does not provide actual location of hot/cool areas
Dose Profiles
graphs of dose versus distance from the central ray, at fixed depths
Cumulative DVH
DVH is a plot of the volume of the anatomical structure receiving a certain dose
Considered more useful and commonly used
Differential DVH
This DVH is a plot of volume of the organ receiving a dose within a specified dose interval
What are the 2 types of DVH
Differential and cumulative
Requirements for DVH calculation
DVH accuracy depends on
QUANTEC
Provides a summary of the dose/volume/ outcome for many organs
Determines acceptable dose/volume constraints
Hot areas
The concave curve represents a structure in which most of the structure receives a low dose, but with small areas of high dose
Tail area
Aim for it to be in PTV
Problematic if it is outside the PTV