What is evidence based practice (EBP)?
The integration of the best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values and circumstance.
What are the 3 legged stool of EBP?
Describe current best evidence (5)
Describe clinical expertise.
What are the 5 A’s?
How do you relate clinical expertise with current best evidence and patient values, preferences and characteristics in terms of providing treatment?
Describe patient values, preferences, and characteristics. (6)
Sample answer of integration of 3 legged stool.
A clinical must be able to communicate their knowledge to the patient, be able to assess the patient and establish an alliance with them to deliver the best EST that matches the patient’s values characteristics, preferences and circumstances. This involves understanding other alternatives that the patient might want, the risks and benefits that applies to the patient, and whether the patient have sufficient access to the treatment (maybe in terms of therapy and how often therapy is).
The decision too administer the best EST needs to come from the best available research evidence. This involves looking through meta-analyses and critically appraising the quality and relevance of the treatments for your patient. This may involve integration of knowledge. The psychologist must then administer the treatment by first designing it based on all of the considerations above, conduct the treatment, analysing it, and reporting the results appropriately.
What are the strengths (1) and limitations (3) of clinical experience?
Strengths:
- Experience can result in more exposure to relevant knowledge and competency in delivering ESTs
Limitations:
- Experience — a collection of anecdotes based on your patients. Biased data? Cognitive biases?
Patients form the data that we’ve collected based on a certain treatment — biased as not all are recollected
What are the levels of evidence in EBP? (6)
What are systematic reviews?
A systematic review attempts to identify, appraise and synthesise all the empirical evidence that meets pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a specific research question. Researchers conducting systematic reviews use explicit, systematic methods that are selected with a view aimed at minimising bias, to produce more reliable findings to inform decision making.
What are meta-analyses?
statistical analysis of findings in a systematic review, considered top of the evidence hierarchy (look for meta-analyses first)
What are RCTs?
What are case-control studies/case series?
Descriptive studies, prone to selection bias, no control group.
What are Background info/expert opinion
Ideas, opinions, anecdotes?
Why are reporting standards needed and what are some examples of established guidelines?
Increased transparency facilitates critical appraisal of research quality. Psychologist are making important decisions with implications for patient’s wellbeing — essential that this is based on best evidence currently available.
Why do we need EBP? (5)