The Social Contract Theory
The Social Contract Theory: Evaluation
Strengths:
- Places rational agreements at the centre of ethics, allowing for a universal foundation of right
Weakness:
- assumes all individual have equal bargaining powers,
- Ignores groups that face inequality: women, minorities
- Doesn’t give a solution for inequality
- Marxist: masks inequalities, protecting the rich and powerful
John Locke
John Locke Evaluation
Strengths:
- accessible to all as not grounded in religion
- Formed hte philosophical basis for modern human rights UN declaration of human rights
- Justifies Revolution against oppressive governments
Weaknesses:
- originally excluded women, non-Europeans, and non property holders -> Making it elitist in its historical form
- Locke himself was involved in colonial projects, so the theory was selectively applied
- Property rights emphasis can reinforce economic inequalities -> giving power to the elite
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Jean-Jacques Rousseau Evaluation
Strengths:
- recognises social structures cause inequalities Influenced modern democratic socialism
- Challenged the legitimacy of extreme wealth
Weaknesses:
- suppresses the individual right -> tyranny of the majority
- Can justify authoritarianism if it claims to represent the general will
- Vague about how the general will is determined
John Rawls
The Veil of Ignorance:
- Imagines designing a society without knowing anything about yourself or what groups you fit into, eg race, gender, class, or ability
- Rational individual would choose priciples ensuring fairness for all
Two key priciples:
1. Equal basic liberties: eg freedom of speech and religion
2. Fair equality of opportunity
- Difference principle: inequalities arranged to benefit the least advantaged
John Rawls Evaluation
Strengths:
- practicle and rational
- Protected both individual freedom and economic justice
- Provides a secular moral foundation
Weaknesses:
- too idealistic, the real word politics is driven by self interest
- Libertarians (eg Nozick) argue Rawls restricts freedom by redistributing wealth unfairly -> Say it still reflects western liberal values, not truely neutral