What is ethics
it investifates normative questions about what people ought to do
In ethics what are the two paradigms
consequentialist and deontologist
What are consequentialists
Consequentialists judge actions based on their consequences
Actions are not inherently good or bad
Of all the actions a person could take at any given moment, the morally right thing to do is to take the action with the best overall consequences
What idea is consistent with consequentialism
Utalitarianism by Jeremy Benthem and Stuart mill
actions are right in the proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness
What is deontology
Deontologists judge actions based on general rules
Choices are either morally required, forbidden, or permitted
Some choices may be morally forbidden no matter how good their consequences are
What idea is consistent with deontology
Kant’s moral philosophy holds that a rule guiding your actions (a maxim) is morally acceptable only if everyone could follow the same rule without contradiction. If a rule would fail when universalized, then it is not morally permissible to act on it. Therefore, if your maxim cannot be applied to everyone, the action is morally wrong.
What are the strengths of consequentialism
Practical, flexible
Clear (simply reflect on consequences- any action can always have consequences. Reflect on consequences to judge the action, making consequenitlism easy to follow
What are the weaknesses of consequentialism
Consequences often unpredictable- many possible outcomes, cant judge everyone entirely.
No type of act inherently wrong e.g murder
Many actions being flexible can lead to unpredictable consequences
Deontology strengths
Rules give clarity across situations meaning rules are universal (Rules provide consistency for outcomes)
values good intentions — it judges actions by whether they are done from duty and moral principle, not by their outcomes
What are the weaknesses of deontology
Lack of flexibility
No definite list of “good” and “bad” -largely subjective morality differs cultureally.
Unclear justification of moral rules- not know where they come from we just have to follow without knowing why- lack of clarity.
describe a weakness
A
in case of new actions, denotology has to figurer out on an abrstract level whether the act is premitted or forbidden , but who decides on the rule / decides good or bad
How are deonotology and consequentialist ethics implimented
by ethical guidlines such as the Nuremberg code.
When was the Nuremberg Code created
Nuremberg Code (1947) was created as a result of the Nuremberg Doctors’ Trial after WW2
what are other ethical guidlines for research
Declaration of Helsinki (1964)
Society/Association guidelines, e.g., BPS Code of Ethics and Conduct (2021)
Data Protection Act 2018 (UK implementation of General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR))
what are the deontological ethics in the nuremberg code
define a forbidden act- death/ disabling injury is not allowed unless it is self-inflicted
What are the consequentialism ethics in the nuremberg code
The Nuremberg Code requires experiments to have clear societal value and for researchers to balance potential benefits against risks to participants before proceeding.
What is informed consent
where ppts are told the purpose , duration , procedures and risks, discomforrts and benifits in the study .Goal: Informed decision about study participation
when are there cases when consent isnt given
Special consideration for populations without the legal/practical capacity for consent
Children
Incapable adults (e.g., dementia, cognitive disability
What are the exceptions of informed consent
Observational studies in a public place
if Information available in the public domain
What is voluntary participation
Prospective participants should be able to decide freely if they want to participate
Any pressure or coercion should be avoided
what is right to withdraw
Participation is voluntary at any time during a study without negative consequences
Participants should be able to withdraw their data
What is the principle of beneficence in research ethics?
Researchers must maximize potential benefits of a study for participants, society, or science.
What is non-maleficence and how does it protect participants?
Researchers must minimize potential risks or harm—both physical and mental—and ensure that the benefits of the study outweigh the risks.
Who are considered vulnerable participants and why is extra care needed?
vulnerable groups include:
People with physical/mental disorders
People with limited decision-making capacity
People with specific life experiences (e.g., assault, pregnancy)
Vulnerability varies by situation, so special protections are required.