what are vestigial traits, and why are they powerful evidence for evolution?
vestigial traits are reduced or non-functional structure inherited from ancestors
EX: human tailbones (coccyx) python hip bones
they are strong evidence for evolution bc/ they have no function explanation without ancestry - they only make sense in light of evolutionary history
what limits evolutionary outcomes even when selection is strong?
genetic constraints > the available genetic variation in a population limits what traits can evolve. Evolution can only work with existing variation; it cannot produce traits for which no heritable variation exists. this is why evolution does not produce perfect adaptations
what is evolution?
what does it mean that evolution is both a pattern and a process?
pattern: evolutionary change revealed by data/facts/observations on the natural world
process: the mechanisms that produce the observed pattern > natural causes of natural phenomena
what are adaptation and how do they relate to natural selection?
adaptation = inherited characteristics of an organism that enhance its survival and reproduction in a specific environment
environmental adaptation = origin of new species (Darwin’s core link)
adaptation arise via natural selection
define natural selection
a process where individuals with certain heritable traits survive and reproduce at a higher rate than other individuals
overtime, increases the frequency of advantageous traits in a population
KEY: individuals don’t evolve > populations do
what are the 2 key observations and 2 inferences of natural selection?
Observations:
1. members of a population vary in inherited traits
2. all species can produce more offspring than the environment can support > many fail to survive/reproduce
Inferences:
1. individuals with favorable traits leave more offspring
2. unequal ability to survive/reproduce > accumulation of favourable traits over generations
what are the 3 KEY POINTS about natural selection?
define homologous characteristics vs. analogous (convergent) characteristics
Homologous: in different organisms > similar bs/ inherited from a common ancestor
analogous (convergent): similar characteristics due to shared environmental constraints, NOT a close evolutionary relationship. Related to convergent evolution > organisms that evolve similar featured as solutions to the same problems
what is Scala Naturae (great chain of being)?
the idea from Greek philosophy that organisms can be arranged on a ladder/scale of complexity from simple to complex
Aristotle thought species were fixed. supported by the Old testament > species individually designed by God > perfect
what did Carolus Linnaeus believe and contribute?
developed binomial nomenclature and a nested classification system. Grouped organisms by genus
DID NOT base classification on evolutionary kinship. Darwin later argued classification SHOULD reflect evolutionary relationships
what are strata and what is their significance?
Strata (stratum) = rock layers formed when new sediment covers older layers
give a glimpse of organisms living at the time they were formed. Revealed through erosion, Foundation of paleontology
who was Georges Cuvier and what did he contribute?
French scientist (1769–1832) who largely developed paleontology.
Noticed: the older the strata, the less similar fossils were to current life-forms.
Proposed: across layers, some species disappeared and some appeared — explained by catastrophes wiping out populations, with new species immigrating after (sudden events). Believed in commonality of extinctions, but NOT evolution.
how does Cuvier’s hypothesis differ from Lamarck’s? which is scientific?
Cuvier (catastrophism): Species don’t evolve; catastrophes cause extinctions confined to local regions, later repopulated by other species immigrating. ✗ Testable against fossil record → belief species don’t evolve = false.
Lamarck (use & disuse + inheritance of acquired characteristics): Testable in predictions for fossils as groups adapted to new habitats → inheritance of acquired chars in living organisms = false.
Both are scientific (testable).
what is Lamarck’s hypothesis of evolution? what was he right and wrong about?
Recognized: Evolution explains patterns in fossils.
Remembered for incorrect mechanism:
Accepted principles:
1. Use & disuse — body parts often used → bigger, stronger; not used → deteriorate.
2. Inheritance of acquired characteristics — parents pass down developed characteristics to offspring (Darwin also believed this — eg. mother who dyes her hair will pass that hair colour to offspring). ✗
Also believed organisms had an innate drive to become more complex → Darwin rejected this.
what were the key details and finding of the Voyage of the Beagle?
Aimed to chart poorly-known stretches of South American coast.
Findings:
* Organisms from temperate regions of SA more similar to SA tropics than to temperate Europe.
* Fossils differed from, but resembled, living organisms of SA.
* Galápagos: birds were similar but different species; some unique to islands, others on adjacent islands.
* Galápagos animals resembled SA species but not found anywhere else world-wide.
Hypothesized: SA organisms → Galápagos → diversified, giving rise to new species on various islands
what is the key example of adaptation from the Galapagos finches?
Galápagos finches = beaks & behaviour adapted to specific foods on different islands.
The most recent common ancestor was an insect-eating finch; not all descendants are insect-eaters.
Used as evidence for adaptive radiation from a mainland ancestor.
What is artificial selection, and how did it influence Darwin’s thinking?
Selective breeding (eg. domesticated plants and animals) — selecting & breeding individuals with desired traits → results in crops, livestock, pets that have little resemblance to wild ancestors (artificial selection).
Led Darwin to believe a similar process occurs in nature, based on 2 observations about populations.
How did Malthus influence Darwin’s theory of natural selection?
Malthus: human suffering (disease, famine, war) results from human pop. inc. faster than food/resources.
→ Traits advantageous for survival & reproduction are favoured → appear at greater frequency next gen.
→ Over time, most individuals will possess the favourable traits → refines match of organism to environment.
Ideas from The Origin of Species — what does descent w/ modification by nat. sel. explain?
Explains:
* Unity of life → organisms share many characteristics.
* Diversity of life.
* Match between organisms and their environments.
Also: extinction and the branching concept explain why there may be morphological gaps between related species (can document divergence or present-day groups by ‘filling in’ gaps between them).
What links common ancestry to diversity of life?
Descent with Modification → unity AND diversity of life.
Homologous characteristics: In different organisms that are similar bc they were inherited from a common ancestor.
Analogous (convergent): Similar characteristics due to shared environmental constraints, NOT a close evolutionary relationship — related to convergent evolution.
What are the 4 types of evidence for evolution?
What is the MRSA case study, and what does it illustrate about natural selection?
Principles highlighted: Nat. sel. edits existing traits rather than creating new ones; rapid evolution occurs in species with short generation times; nat. sel. is context-dependent.
What is Homology and what does it refer to?
Refers to similarities resulting from common ancestry.
Evolution = as a process of descent w/ modification, alters ancestral traits in descendants, resulting in shared structures that may serve different functions.