Why should we study how experts think and what they do?
Shows results of successful learning
Goal of achieving expertise (novice -> expert)
They have insight into domains that others may not
They are often our teachers (but not always the best ones!)
What is an expert? (Common Assumption)
“An expert is someone who knows all the answers”
Experts (as compared to Novices)
Experts:
Have more declarative and procedural knowledge on a subject [quantitative difference]
Notice and use meaningful patterns
Organize their knowledge differently [qualitative difference]
Features of Expert Knowledge
Fluent Retrieval & Meaningful Patterns
Content/Access & Organization of Knowledge
Connecting Transfer and Expertise
We often think concretely, but for transfer we need to think abstractly
Abstract thinking separates Experts from Novices
Content Knowledge= Good teacher? EXPERT BLIND SPOT
Content Knowledge: “What”
Pedagogical Knowledge: “How”
Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Situated Cognition
Teaching
Content Knowledge
Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Pedagogical Content Knowledge Example: Teaching Hamlet
OR
Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Form of practical and contextualized knowledge of
The Expert Teacher (acc. to Stein)
“In general, teachers with more explicit and better organized knowledge tend to provide instruction that features conceptual connections, appropriate and varied representations, and active and meaningful student discourse”
The Novice Teacher (Stein)
Experts and Teaching
Expertise in a particular domain does not guarantee that expert will be good at helping other people learn
Key Principles of Expertise
Why should we care?
If we know how experts think and work, it can inform instruction and teaching
How knowledge is organized
- Start with broader, conceptual understanding
Conditionalized Knowledge
- When, where, how to apply knowledge
Content vs. Teaching Expertise
- Just because you know it, doesn’t mean you can teach it