Psychology investigated
Fagen
Research method
Fagen
controlled structured observation
Research design
Fagen
Repeated measures
Aim
Fagen
To investigate whether secondary positive reinforcement (SPR) techniques could effectively train traditionally trained elephants in Nepal to voluntarily participate in trunk-washing procedures.
Hypothesis
Fagen
SPR techniques could effectively train traditionally trained elephants in Nepal to voluntarily participate in trunk-washing procedures.
Variables
Fagen
Dependent variables: training session duration, number of offers, percentage of correct responses, cumulative time spent training, overall improvement in performance.
Conclusions
Fagen
Strengths and weaknesses
Fagen
Strengths:
* Reliability
* Internal validity
* Quantitative data
* Ecological validity
* Ethics
Weaknesses:
* Generalisability
* Internal validity
Application to real life
Fagen
Service dog trainers can use SPR techniques to increase voluntary cooperation with tasks
Issues and debates
Fagen
Nature vs nurture:
* Nature: biological differences in factors such as cognitive abilities and personalities impact variations in performance.
* Nurture: researchers successfully implemented training procedures that taught the elephants how to perform a trunk wash independently.
Individual vs situational:
* Individual: there are differences in learning speed and performance (including mastery of the task) between the elephants involved.
* Situational: there are environmental factors that affect performance, such as the impact of tourists, other animals, or other distractions.