need for HRM strategy
when question refers to HRM strategy, it means…
hard or soft approach, which is further divided into:
hard VS soft HRM
hard = see as cost, use sparingly and little concern for WLB or development
soft = see as asset that needs to be nurtured to motivate to work towards objectives of business
hard HRM may save costs in the SR, but in the LR…
use of hard VS soft HRM depends on
why are core workers and peripheral workers treated differently?
core workers have the skills and potential to help the business meet objectives so it is crucial to develop and motivate them to want to stay loyal to the business and work towards objectives
peripheral workers tend to be low-skilled and easy to replace
which employment strategies come under a Hard and Soft HRM approach?
hard - part time, gig, zero-hour, temporary
soft - full time, permanent
why does a hard approach use less secure contracts?
hard HRM focuses on cost reduction - main benefit is that they only require employees to be paid when they work, minimising labour costs
soft HRM on the other hand is focused on developing, motivating and retaining core employees to meet objectives, so full time and permanent more appropriate as they allow more training and job security
pros of permanent/full time contracts
NOTE: if changing from zero-hour to full time: Guides will have more certainty in terms of their hours and also possibly which tours they will be taking which will allow for more effective planning (AN) leading to reliability of service and higher customer satisfaction. (DAN)
cons of permanent/full time contracts
ideal type of contract depends on
4 main problems with flexible employment contracts
communication issues can be overcome with effective IT systems e.g. group messaging or intranets
MBO
dividing the business’ overall aim into specific targets for each department and individual, then comparing actual performance against these targets
pros of MBO
cons of MBO
guarantee, motivation, smart, manager, success, time - mgmt ss
MBO Eval
hard HRM
focused on cutting costs, by treating employees as any other resource that must be obtained and used as cheaply as possible. Linked to Taylor’s scientific mgmt theory (achieving maximum efficiency with strict control) and Theory X mgmt
soft HRM
sees employees as an asset that must be developed and nurtured to help them self-actualise, which will in turn motivate them to work towards business’ objectives and stay loyal
linked to motivators in Herzberg’s 2-factor theory and Theory Y mgmt style
should business use hard or soft approach?
will not use completely hard/soft, will be a mixture of both and the degree depends on:
pros of part time/zero hour/gig contracts
situational - if using PT AND FT
could access wider range of skills than just FT - expertise can increase quality of output, thus leading to higher added value and competitiveness so premium price
cons of part time/zero hour/gig contracts
OR poor quality customer service thus lower satisfaction OR lower productivity hence higher unit costs
full or part time eval
e.g. given that they are a seasonal business, part time better for minimising costs
main advantage of flexible employment contracts to workers (and flexibility in general)
main advantages to employers of offering flexible employment contracts