Lecture 4 - Methods Flashcards

(26 cards)

1
Q

why is studying humans hard?

A

human behaviour is mulitply determined w/ many ingredients (characteristics of upbringing/pesonaility/physical capabilities, etc.)
doing the exact same thing will not get your the exact same outcome like baking a bread

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is an example of a question that’s hard to answer

A

whether a person will go back into a fire to save a cat
does

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is experimenter bias?

A

experimenter has an effect on the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why should we care about methods?

A

a lot of science everywhere - results all over the news - relevant to us humans: working out, food, sleep, sex, studying, dieting, medicine
must be able to evaluate source (and consider methods) before following advice

scientific part is solved - vaccines are being developed quickly
need to convince people - scientific literacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the ultimate goal of the science?

A

understand why things happen to predict AND change the future

what to know to what extent X CAUSES Y - want causality not just correlation, must develop evidence for it slowly across many studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is empiricism

A

watching

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the 3 ways of XX? which one has dominated in psychology?

A
  1. correlation
  2. quasi-experiment
  3. experiment

experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what kind of result does observation lead to?

A

correlational studies - record/measures of different variables to see if they covary (follow same trends)
w/ Pearson’s coefficient: 1 is entirely correlated, 0 is not correlated at all (unrelated)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

who invented random sampling and random assignment to condition?

A

Fisher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how do we define an experiment? what does it enable?

A

MANIPULATION - only one element/variable of a condition is different
if outcome is different across conditions, will have SOME certainty that manipulation caused that difference. can make a CAUSAL CLAIM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what’s an example of an experiment?

A

ERN (Error Rooted Negativity) - get a tick if made an error
neurons of boneXX measured by electrodes

spider-phobics doing a task and had spider Loreta come up to their phase

independent variable: presence of spider
conditions: within-study design (get both conditions within same trial - best control is within ourselves)
dependent variable: ERN activation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

when should we observe vs experiment?

A

can’t manipulate everything - in those cases, observe (use correlational data) or quasi-experiment.
ex. age, race tidal waves / earthquakes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

can correlational data or quasi-experiments generate causal evidence?

A

yes, but will be weaker and needs to be paired with other evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how can we conclude that a manipulation caused differences?

A

by generalising results

ensure sample is random - random sampling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is the benefit and limitation of random sampling

A

maximize odds that our results generalise (and we don’t have a cohort effect)

can’t randomly sample from everyone on the planet. end up being convenience samples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what sample of people does most research come from?

A

WEIRD: Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich, Democratic. represents 12% of worldwide population

mostly on psychology undergraduates + rats

17
Q

what is important to look at when reading news/claims?

A

who is the sample made up of
how far should the claim go

18
Q

is it possible to study volunteers?

A

yes - all studies (since ethic board created) uses volunteers

19
Q

what is snowball sampling?

A

sample is not random since communities are similar - not representative

20
Q

what is random assignment

A

randomise which condition a participant is assigned, such that the random noise is cancelled out (characteristics are evened out (non-systematic) enough

21
Q

what is the important when comparing different conditions (ex. snakes vs spiders causing fear)?

A

also need a control group (good study will have multiple - example placebo group)

provides interpretability for direction of comparison

22
Q

what is the control group important for?

A

determining direction of effect
AND
if effect is actually different from the baseline

23
Q

what are the types of blinding?

A
  1. single-blind - participants don’t know what condition participants are in (have placebo)
  2. double-blind - participants AND researchers don’t know what condition participants are in
24
Q

why is blinding useful?

A

single-blind: participants may want to help out with (or work against) research - no direction so if everyone does it, cancels out

double-blinding: prevent experimenter bias

25
what's a double-blinding example?
social priming behaviour (words associated with eachother ex. "Peanut butter" & "Jelly" study: trying to subtly prime smth and observe change in behaviour. show words to participants, one with no category and one related to elderliness (Florida, bingo, etc). then observed how long it took them to walk slower. - dependent variable is behaviour not attidude (more valued as scientist). replication attempt w/ single-blinded found same result. w/ double-blinded found no result single-blind - one recording time is the same as the person giving the words - is confound since influenced results (could have stopped time sooner for the one with no category)
26
what points should be considered when evaluating claims?
1. based on data 2. motives (questionable) of researchers 3. how many participants 4. who are the participants 5. do other experts respect the claim