aristotle
principle of continuity
gradual increase in perfection
ontogeny resembled hierarchy
linear hierarchy of the souls
“scala naturae”
epigenesis
organismal development as the successive differentiation (addition) of structures.
Law of terminal addition of organismal development (Mecke-serres)
increasing complexity, adding new parts at the end of an existing ontogeny
structures develop from simple to more complex form
lower organism found within ontogeny of higher organism
Lamarck
two part process:
1. complexifying force drinving organisms
2. process of use and disuse (environmental force)
Laws of Individual Development (Von Baer)
Three-fold parallelism (1833)
embryology, phylogeny, fossil record
they all kinda matched
Darwin (1809-1882)
the raw material for progress is random variation
extinction is a common feature in natural history
there is competition for scarce natural resources
the variation is not in any way induces, but RANDOM, at least in the sense that all directions of variation are equally likely
heterochrony
embryology can perhaps fast forward or skip , or maybe delete certain parts, so that we don’t see it, kinda like hidden data
Haeckel
ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny
development stages recapitulate adult evolutionary stages
here you can sort of truncate parts of development
Microevolution vs macro evolution
Micro = population level
Macro = species and higher taxonomic levels (where gene flow stops, separate species)
microevolution
relatively small scale change within a species
constant source of genetic mutations drives phenotypic variation
overabundance of offspring drives “survival of the fittest”
descent with modification
macroevolution
occurs at phenomental temporal and spatial scales and explores the limits of biology and constrains