Methods Flashcards

(22 cards)

1
Q

Why do we collect data?

A
  • We seek to cover all parts of the psychological triad, gather the clues and try to understand personality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What’s a mnemonic device for our data gathering?

A

BLIS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Name the 4 kinds of data gathering

A
  • Self Reports
  • Informant’s reports
  • Life outcomes
  • Behavioral Data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Self-Reports

A

= Asking the person directly
- questionnaires or surveys
- high face validity
- most common

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Advantages of S

A
  • Large amount of info
  • direct access to thoughts, feelings etc
  • often have definitional truth
  • causal force
  • simple and easy to collect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Definitional truth

A

Things that literally only YOU can know such as self esteem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Causal force

A

Self-perceptions create their own truths that affect the psychological triad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Disadvantages of S

A
  • Bias
  • Error (It can be hard to evaluate oneself accurately because it’s all you know)
  • Overuse (too simple and easy to collect)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Informant’s Reports

A

= Asking someone who knows the person of interest
- No training needed, can be coworkers, partners, family, friends etc
- May be more accurate than self-judgement especially when evaluating undesirable traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Advantages of I

A
  • Large amounts of info (ask many people)
  • Real-world basis, high ecological validity
  • Common sense (informants have it and take things like context into account)
  • Definitional truth
  • Causal force
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Disadvantages of I

A
  • Limited access to behavioural info
  • Lack of access to private experiences
  • Error, memory is unreliable
  • Bias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Life Outcomes

A

= Obtain real-life facts from archival records or self-report

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Advantages of L

A
  • Objective, verifiable
  • Intrinsic importance (since we kept these records in the first palce)
  • Psychological relevance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Disadvantages of L

A
  • Multidetermination (life outcomes and facts have MANY causes that might not be obvious in sheer data)
  • Some records may not exist or be very hard to get access
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Behavioural Data

A
  • = Watching what people actually do, either in daily life (natural B data, with diaries, digital footprints, wearable audio recorders etc) or in a lab (laboratory B data, experiments and physiological measures)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Advantages of B

A
  • Natural = The most realistic you can get
  • Laboratory = Desired contexts can be created. appears to be most objective
17
Q

Disadvantages of B

A
  • Natural Data = Very difficult to achieve, ethical considerations, desired contexts rarely occur naturally
  • Laboratory = Difficult, expensive, uncertain interpretation, questionable generalizability
18
Q

3 Main Aspects for Data Quality

A
  • Reliability
  • Validity
  • Generalizability
19
Q

Reliability

A

Does the data consistently measure what they want to measure?
–> want to minimize error
–> Is this data stable? is it replicable?
*PRECONDITION for validity

20
Q

Validity

A

Does the data accurately measure what they want to measure?

21
Q

Generalizability

A

Do the findings from this data apply to other data, situations, or ppl?
(hard to measure and quantify)

22
Q

Barnum Effect

A

The phenomenon that occurs when individuals believe that personality descriptions apply specifically to them (more so than to other people), despite the fact that the description is actually filled with information that applies to everyone