Morphology
The internal structure of words and the principles underlying such structuring
Words/lexemes
morphemes
Simple words
Simple words consist of one morpheme (old, the)
Complexs words
Complex words consist of two morphemes (teapot, disappeared, into, trees)
Free morphemes
don’t need to be attached to another element to convey their meaning or function (old, tea, pot, appear, tree)
Bound morphemes (affixes)
must always be attached to another element (dis-, -ed, -s)
Always written with a hyphen where it connect
base or stem
-The form to which an affix is added
examples:
the base of trees is tree
the base of governments is government
the base of government is govern
The base of lucky is luck
The base of luckily is lucky (NOTE: sometimes the spelling changes when morphemes are combined)
root
Crosslinguistic variation
Some of the most apparent different between languages are differences in morphology
Degree of synthesis
Degree of fusion
Word hood
how we know when a word begins and ends for example ice cream, blackboard, black board???
because:
* native speaker intuition (although orthography may
interfere)
* independent & phonologically coherent
- can be pronounced alone
- pauses tend to not split up words
- interjections tend to not split up words
- phonological processes such as word stress
* language change: words frequently used together may
become one unit, i.e., one word
Compounding
morhposyntax
the head determines the lexical category of the compound
semantics
Affix types: operation on bases
Bound roots
Japanese: all verb roots are bound roots
kii-ta ‘listened’ *kii ‘listen’
listen- PST
Morphological analysis strategies
Autosegmental affixes
Hebrew example: jalad ‘give birth’ vs. jalud ‘born’ etc.
auto segmental representation
autosegmental representation: root & affix on different tiers
Af (‘progressive verb’)
j a l o d
Root (‘birth’)
True or false: auto segmentals can apply to different tones creating different meaning
True! For example, Chichewa (a Bantu language spoken in Malawi, and parts of
Mozambique & Zimbabwe)
a. ndináfótokoza ‘I explained’ (simple past)
b. ndinafótókoza ‘I explained’ (recent past)
c. ndinâ:fótókoza ‘I explained’ (remote past)
* The different past tenses are distinguished by different tones
(high and falling), the placement of these tones, and, in one
case, vowel length. These are all suprasegmental features.
non-concatenative