what are the 2 explanations for obedience?
agentic state and legitimacy of authority
what is the definition of agentic state?
someone not feeling responsible for their actions because they were obeying an authority figure, making that authority figure responsible for the individuals actions
what was agentic state based on?
agency theory the individual tends to shift the blame onto the person who issued the order because of denial
what is an example of someone being in agentic state?
open fire on civilians because your commander ordered you to then saying “I was just obeying orders”
~ an individual is in agentic state they feel removed from their actions
what does agentic state allow people to do?
minimise responsibility and guilt about their actions because they are acting under someone else’s command which leads to blaming anyone but themselves
what can also play a role in the agentic state?
Social hierarchies also play a part in this (the higher someone is, the more obedience is expected from lower than them which can mean it is easier to shift personal responsibility to them). Being apart of a social hierarchy is a binding factor which can contribute to destructive obedience
what is the agentic shift?
when someone goes from making their own decisions to obeying an authority figures orders and blaming it on them
what is a strength of agentic state?
strong external validity ~ holocaust (ordinary people made to do horrific thiings), rwandan genocide (neighbour against neighbour)
what is a weakness of agentic state?
cannot explain why people do not obey even when they are justified in blaming someone else
what was the sample for Milgram’s study?
40 american male volunteers
what was Milgram trying to investigate?
the conflict between personal conscience and obedience to authority
what was the method for Milgrams study?
A ‘teacher’ gave electric shocks (which were fake but the participants didnt know about this) to any incorrect answers the ‘learner’ gave
what did Milgram find?
65% p’s went up to 450 volts, 100% went to 300 volts
~ behavioural responses include: shaking, crying, sweating etc
what did Milgram conclude?
Destructive obedience is due to specific situational factors eg took place at Yale, volunteers were paid, experimenter was wearing a lab coat
what is a strength of Milgrams study?
what is a weakness of Milgram’s study?
unethical ~ p’s deceived and went through both physical and psychological harm meaning it cannot be replicated today. The right to withdraw was not given (experimenters prods made it difficult to leave)
what are situational factors of obedience?
external factors that influence how likely an individual is to follow orders
how does proximity apply to obedience?
how close/far someone is, the more remote the victim, the easier it is to harm them
(if someone is out of sight it is easier to achieve destructive obedience since it can reduce moral strain).
what is an example of proximity from Milgram’s study?
Teacher and learner put in separate rooms (when they were in he same room obedience dropped from 65% to 40%)
how does uniform apply to obedience?
If the person perceives someone as someone to be an authority figure then they are more likely to obey them
(can be taught both directly and indirectly via societal and cultural norms from childhood experiences)
what is an example of uniform from Milgram’s study?
Experimenter wore a lab coat which is a uniform to make him look like he was in charge (uniform confers authority on the wearer and results in higher levels of obedience)
how does location apply to obedience?
location affects obedience, the less credible, low-status location resulted in a lower level of obedience
what is an example of location?
Milgram conducted a variation to his original procedure to investigate the effect of location, as follows: Milgram ran the study in a run-down building in Bridgeport, Connecticut
Participants were told the experiment was being run by the Research Association of Bridgeport where there was no mention at all of Yale University
what is a strength of situational factors?
has high ecological validity due to the participants’ lack of awareness of their participation in the study
the study also used a degree of control with its three distinct conditions of the independent variable which means that it has some reliability