To systematically evaluate a radiographic image and determine:
It meets diagnostic quality standards, and
It follows the technical and procedural parameters of
good radiographic practice.
Film Critiquing
helps detect technical errors, processing problems, positioning faults, and equipment issues–all vital in QA/QC programs.
Film critiquing
step how to critique film
Step 1: Verify Patient and Film Information
Step 2: Evaluate Exposure Factors
Step 3: Evaluate Geometric Factors (Detail and Distortion)
Step 4: Evaluate Positioning and Collimation
Step 5: Check for Artifacts.
Step 6: Evaluate Processing
Step 7: Assess Diognostic Acceptability
Check patient name, date, anatomical marker, exam type.
Confirm correct image orientation ( AP, PA, Lateral, Oblique)
Ensure the film is properly labeled– incorrect or missing markers are QA violations.
Note: Proper film identification prevents misdiagnosis, wrong-patient errors, and unnecessary repeat exposures.
Step 1: Verify Patient and Film Information
Too dark ( overexposed)- excessive mAs or incorrect kVp.
Ideal: Visible anatomy with good tissue penetration- no areas of excessive burnout or opacity.
High contrast(short scale): few shades of gray (used for extremities, bone detail
Low contrast(long scale): many shades of gray ( used for chest, abdomen)
Ideal: Contrast should be appropriate few the anatomy being imaged.
Step 2: Evaluate Exposure Factors
Look for sharp edges and fine structures Blurring may be caused by:
Motion (patient or tube)
Long exposure time
Poor focal spot size
Film-screen contact problem
Shape distortion- Due to misalignment of tube, part or receptor
Note: Always check for correct centering and alignment to maintain geometric accuracy.
Step 3: Evaluate Geometric Factors (Detail and Distortion)
Is the anatomy of interest centered and fully included?
Are rotation and angulation appropriate?
Is collimation properly applied?
Note: Proper positioning minimizes repeat exam and patient dose.
Step 4: Evaluate Positioning and Collimation
Common artifacts:
Look for unwanted marks or foreign objects on the image.
Jewelry, zippers, buttons
Static marks or scratches
Finger marks or dirt
Grid line, cassette defects
Digital artifacts
Note: Identify whether the artifacts patient-related, equipment related, or processing-related.
Step 5: Check for Artifacts.
For film based systems:
Fogging, chemical stains, roller marks, light leaks, or film overlap
Uneven development may indicate exhausted chemicals or poor temperature control.
Step 6: Evaluate Processing
Ask:
Is the image diagnostically useful?
Can the radiologist visualize the required anatomy andbpathology?
Is the radiation dose justified by the image quality?
Step 7: Assess Diognostic Acceptability