Quality management is the subject of three standards
ISQM 1 (firm level)
ISQM 2 (firm level)
ISA UK 220 (engagement level)
Benefits of a system of quality mangenent
Standard of all audit work completed is high and consistent
Registered auditors are regarded as professionals who follow standards
Quality of the work completed can be measured against a standard
Individuals within a firm know if the work they have completed is acceptable
quality standards require the firm to apply a
Risk based approach, thinking about the specific quality risks for the firm and for its individual engagements. At the centre of the risk based approach is the SOQM
Risk based approach
Focusing and prioritising high risk processes to ensure quality objectives are met
System of quality management
A system sedimented, implemented and operated by a firm to provide the firm with reasonable assurance
Conceptual structure of the risk assessment
Establish quality objectives
Identify risks
Respond to risks
Elements of the SOQM
governance and leadership
Relevant ethical requirements
Acceptance and continuance
Engagement performance
Resources
Information and communication
Quality objectives for acceptance and continuance of client relations
Whether the client has integrity and ethical values
Whether the firm is able to perform the engagement to the required standards
The firms financial/operational priorities should not lead it to accepting or continuing engagements that should not be accepted
For uk firms that undertake audits of fs at least one of the individuals assigned the ultimate responsibility for the SOQM needs to be eligible for the appointment of
Statutory auditor
Sub objectives to ensure ethical quality objectives are met
Personnel receive sufficient training
Audit department staff to receive ethical update training every six months
Audit staff do not accept gifts from clients
Audit documentation should contain ISA 230
What would be necessary to provide an experienced auditor, with no previous connection with the audit, with an understanding of the nature, extent and timing of audit procedures, the results of audit procedures and the audit evidence obtained and significant matters arising during the audit and conclusions reached theron
When difficult or contentious issues arise
The assurance team must consult properly on the matter and the conclusions drawn as a result of consultation must be properly recorded
Any differences of opinion
Must be resolved prior to the assurance report being issued. This may mean that a person independent of the engagement eg engagement quality reviewer, may have to be involved in resolving the difference of opinion
The EQR is applied only
For audits of PIEs
Where the audit engagement partner has determined that an EQR is needed eg as an ethical safeguard
Audits or other engagements for which the firm determined that an engagement quality review is @m appropriate response to address one or more quality risks
Circumstances where an EQR may be performed, even though there might not be a legal requirement ISQM 1
Engagements requiring a high level of complexity or judgement
Engagements which have a history of control deficiencies of regulatory intervention
Anomalies encountered during engagement acceptance and continuance procedures
Engagements which contain the use of info required for subsequent purposes
Higher risk entities that fall outside the scope of PIEs
For listed entities, an EQR is conducted by
A suitably qualified partner or other person in the firm not otherwise involved in the engagement or by an external consultant. Role is to review the significant judgements made on the engagement. The engagement partner is still responsible for the engagement as a whole, so if something goes wrong they cannot share their responsibility with the reviewer
The EQR is not a review of the whole audit but
Only of the significant judgements made
Requirements of the engagement quality reviewer ISQM 2
Have the competence and the abilities, including sufficient time and the appropriate authority to perform the EQR
comply wi5 the relevant ethical requirements
Comply with provisions of law and regulation that are relevant to the eligibility of the EQ reviewer
Uk where the engagement being reviewed is an audit, the reviewer must be
Eligible for appointment as statutory auditorm