define aim
what is a directional hypothesis
- e.g. ‘music will negatively effect recall’
what is a non-directional hypothesis
what is a null hypothesis
-predicts that there will be no difference, only difference is just due to chance
independent variable
dependent variable
-the thing that is measured
how do you operationalise hypotheses/IV’s/DV’s . How do you make it measurable ?
ask yourself can I count this easily? If the answer is no then it is not operationalised
situational variables
participant variables
what are the two extraneous variables
situational variables
participant variables
confounding variable
a type of IV that varies systematically between conditions
investigator effects
-an experimenter may accidentally give cues to make partisans respond in a certain way
independent measures
-group of participants, split them in half. Half of the participants do the first condition of the IV and the second half do the 2nd condition of the IV. Compare the performance of both groups.
evaluation of independent measures
advantage = you don’t get order effect as participants are only doing one condition of the IV so they don’t get use to what’s happening.
disadvantage =no control of participant variables and you need twice as many participants
overcoming these problems = random allocation of participants which theoretically distributes participant variables evenly.
repeated measures
-group of participants take part in all levels of the IV. Same participants in all conditions of the IV
evaluation of repeated measures
Advantage = fewer participants. No individual differences as participants are taking part in all conditions of the IV
Disadvantage = you might get an order effect. Participants may do better on 2nd test due to practice effect. May guess experiment purpose and change their behaviour.
overcoming these problems = use 2 different tests to reduce practice effect. Counterbalancing can be used to deal with order effect- cover story can be presented to the participants about the purpose of the test.
matched Paris design
evaluation of matched pairs design
advantages = controls some participant variables, participants won’t guess the studies aim. As a result of having different participants for each condition there is no order effect.
disadvantages = achieving matched pairs is difficult and time consuming. May not control all participant variables
overcoming these problems = restrict the no. of variables to the matched one. A pilot study to show key variables that need to be matched
random sampling
opportunity sample
-people who are available at the time the study is carried out. e.g. people in the common room.
volunteer sample
-participants are recruited for through an advert, newspaper, Internet etc
systematic sample
stratified sampling
1 strength and 1 weakness of random sampling
strength = least biased weakness = difficult to achieve in practice as target population could be huge so time consuming