Robbery Flashcards

(27 cards)

1
Q

DEFINITION: WOCR

A

Without claim of right
No belief of a right to own or control something.

COR
belief of a right to own or control something. Whether mistaken or though ignorance. As long as the belief is held. Does not have to be a reasonable belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

DEFINITION: RTS

A

Relation to scenario

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

DEFINITON: Person
Use in liability writing

A

“Jason is another person and the victim of assault in this matter”
Bob is another person and the victim of robbery in this matter”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Is there an attempted robbery?

A

No.
Attempted theft etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

CASELAW: R v MAIHI
MAIHI is linked to Robbery as ARCHER is to Arson

A

“Accompany” means there must be a clear link nexus between the stealing and the threat of violence. Does not require they both occur at the same time.

I can threaten you today that I will be back tomorrow to steal the goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

CASELAW: R v BROUGHTON
Robbery

A

He BROUGHT his friends

When neither the act of violence nor the threat have been completed. More around the demeanour and circumstances communicating the threat.

Offender and friends surround victim and say “I like your jacket”
To extort the jacket

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

CASELAW: R v JOYCE
Robery proximity

A

The crown must establish that at least 2 persons were physically present at the time the robbery was committed or the assault occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

CASELAW: R v GALEY
Intentionally Being gay with another person while robbing

A

“Being together” involves two or more persons having the common intention to use their combined force with in any event, or as circumstances may require, directly in the perpetration of the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

CASELAW: PENEHA v Police
Robbery
Violence

A

PENE HARD (powerful) punch.
234(1) The actions of the defendant forcibly interfere with the freedom or amount to forcible, powerful or violent action producing a very marked or powerful effect, causing discomfort or bodily injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

S236(1) Assault with intent to Rob
Elements

A

With intent to Rob any person
- Causes GBH to that person or (a)ny other person, or

  • (b)eing armed with any offensive weapon or instrument, or any other thing appearing to be such a weapon or instrument
  • assaults that person or any other person, or
  • being [(c)ozy] together with another person or persons
  • assaults that person or any other person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Assault with intent to rob. Does the person need to be robbed?

A

No. The theft need not be completed. Only the intent and the action require proving. Mens Rea & Actus Rea

Eg. Offender smacked victim with a hammer to steal their phone. Phone gets dropped, broken and not taken by offender.
Intent. Assault complete. Robbery not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

DEFINITION: Offensive weapons or disabling substances
S202A

A

Items made for the purpose of causing injury
Items made for innocent purpose but altered to cause injury
Items carried for the purpose of inflicting injury - prima facie

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ELEMENTS: Robbery
234(1)

A

theft
accompanied by violence or threats of violence.
To any person or property
Used to extort the property stolen, or to prevent/overcome resistance to its being stolen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who or what can violence during a robbery be directed at?

A

Violence can be directed towards any person or property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the purpose of violence in the context of robbery?

A

The violence is used to extort the property stolen or to prevent or overcome resistance to its being stolen.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Fill in the blank: Robbery is theft accompanied by _______ or accompanied by threats of ______.

17
Q

True or False: Robbery only involves threats of violence, not actual violence.

18
Q

What does the term ‘theft’ refer to in the context of robbery?

A

The unlawful taking of someone else’s property with the intent to permanently deprive them of it.

19
Q

LEGISLATION: Ag Rob (b)
S235 Chanel 5 custers

A

(b)eing together with any other person or persons
Robs
Any person

20
Q

LEGISLATION: Crimes act 235(a) - Ag Rob

A

Robs any person
At the time, or immediately before/after the robbery,
Causes GBH
To any person

21
Q

LEGISLATION: ag Rob (c)

A

Being armed [(c)arrying] with an offensive weapon/instrument, or anything appearing to be as such
Robs
any other person

22
Q

LEGISLATION: assault with intent to rob
236(11)(a)
that

A

With intent to rob (a)ny person
Causes GBH to that person or any other person

23
Q

LEGISLATION: Assault with intent to rob (b)
that

A

With intent to rob any person
(b)eing armed with any offensive weapon/instrument or anything appearing to be an offensive weapon/instrument
Assaults that person any other person

24
Q

LEGISLATION: assault with intent to Rob (c)
that

A

With intent to rob any person
Being together with any other person or persons
Assaults that person or any other person

25
CASELAW: R v PEAT robbery
As in the case with theft, the immediate return of the goods by the robber, does not purge the offence, subject to the necessary intent at the time of taking. Peat got worried and returned the bog
26
DEFINITION: Contemporaneous
At the same time
27
CASELAW: DDP v Police Deadly damaging person
GBH. grievous is no more or no less than really serious harm