Functional Level: Argument Structure Therapy Example
Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST)- Edmonds et al., 2009
Explain VNeST
Systematic retrieval of target verbs and related nouns to generate agent and patients, strengthening complete argument structure production around the verb and potentially thematic role mapping.
It activates a large network of autobiographical and semantic knowledge around a central concept that maximises potential for generalisation to untrained words.
The client selects one triad, is assed where why and when to create a long detailed sentences,
Client reads aloud 12 prepared sentences using the same verb (some correct, some wrong agent, themes reversed etc.) and must say whether sentences are correct or not.
Asked again to retrieve the verb.
Is VNeST successful at different levels?
Word- Significant improvement in verb and noun retrieval
Sentence- significant improvement in sentence production around treated AND untreated verbs (Ag + V + Pt)
Increase in number of complete sentences.
Does VNeST generalise? Provide references.
Edmonds et al., 2009
Yes! Generalisation to untreated words.
VNeST has showed generalised verb retrieval and improved thematically complete sentence production for untreated verbs as well as treated verbs.
Structural gains in spontaneous speech, including increased number of complete sentences, increased complexity and sentneces and MLU.
How to make VNeST more functional
Since Edmonds et al., 2009 had same sample size so generalisation cannot be assumed, selecting functional relevant verbs to patient’s daily life and generate personally relevant agents like family member’s names to support personal goals.
Example of goal for VNeST
To retrieve relevant nouns and verbs to produce complete 2-argument spoken sentences with 80% accuracy following the 11-week therapy block.
Reference supporting telerehabilitation use for VNeST
Torinsson et al., 2024
Multilevel therapy for sentence processing/production
NARNIA- Whitworth et al., 2015.
A Novel Approach to Real-life communication: Narrative Intervention in Aphasia.
Combines word and sentence level in context of a narrative.
1) Client identifies main event in each picture and then the verb and nouns. They then create a complete sentence around structure.
2) Using the framework for Narrative Discourse (mind map) sentences are organised around setting the scene, the events taking place and concluding the story. Addition of connectives.
3) When demonstrated narrative ability, the frameworks for recount, procedure and exposition are introduced.
Can use rea-life incidents e.g. planning a holiday, shaving.
Client rates their performance on various scales to monitor performance.
Outcomes and generalisation of NARNIA
Whitworth et al., 2015
Potential generalisation of single word retrieval to untreated words.
Generalisation seen on topics not discussed in NARNIA.
Lexical Change- Improved retrieval of nouns and verbs. Increase in the number of verbs in connected speech!
NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE on tests of sentence production but increase in number of 2 and 3 argument structures and complex sentences in spontaneous speech and improved production of discourse structure in spontaneous speech.
Example of target/aim for NARNIA
To create complete sentences, with accurate argument structure using the NARNIA structure for support, with 80% accuracy.
How to maximise linguistic generalisation for sentence processing.
Combine work on Verb and Sentence production.
Therapies which work on ‘process’- argument structure, thematic role assignment.
Use multi-level therapies! Milman et al. (2014) suggest three key reasons for using multi level intervention:
- Interconnected nature of ‘linguistic networks’.
- Reality of clients having multiple difficulties
- Potential facilitation of generalisation to everyday communication.
Transfer skill to another setting e.g. clinic, home, pubs, shopping trips. To different communication partner, e.g. therapist, partner, family member.