What is obedience?
A form of social influence in which an individual follows a direct order. The person issuing the order is usually a person of authority who has the power to punish when obedient behaviour is not forthcoming
Milgram’s baseline procedure
Baseline findings
Every participant delivered a voltage up to 300. 12.5% of participants stopped at 300. 65% continued to highest level. Milgram also collected qualitative data including observations like participants showed signs of extreme tension
Conclusions
Milgram concluded German people were not ‘different’. The American participants in his study were willing to obey orders even when they might harm another person. He suspected there were certain factors in the situation that encouraged obedience.
Why did Milgram conduct this experiment?
He sought an answer to the question to why such a high proportion of German population obeyed Hitlers commands that led to murder 6 million Jews in the Holocaust.
Evaluation of Milgram’s research
Low internal validity - 75% of patients said they believed the shocks were genuine. 2/3 of these were disobedient. Participants may have shown demand characteristics
Alternative interpretation of Milgram’s theory
According to social identity theory participants in Milgram’s study only obeyed when they identified with scientific aims of the research. When they refer ordered to blindly obey an authoritative figure they refused.
Ethical issues with Milgram’s experiment
Participants were deceived, e.g. the allocation of teacher and learner roles was random but in fact was fixed. Also thought the shocks were real. Milgram dealt with this by debriefing participants
What are situational variables?
Features of the immediate physical and social environment which may influence a person’s behaviour (such as proximity, location etc).
What are dispositional variables?
Behaviour is explained in terms of personality
Milgram situational variables: Proximity
In baseline study, teacher could hear learner but not see him. In proximity variation teacher and learner were in the same room. Caused obedience to decrease from original 65% to 40% Because participant felt more responsible for the consequences of their actions so obedience decreased
Milgram situational variables: Touch proximity
Teacher had to force learners hand onto electric shock plate when he refused to answer a question Obedience dropped to 30% Because participant felt more responsible for the consequences of their actions so obedience decreased
Milgram situational variables: Remote instruction variation
Experimenter left the room and gave instructions to teacher by the phone. Obedience dropped to 20.5% and participants often pretended to give shocks
Milgram situational variables: Uniform
In baseline study, experimenter wore a grey lab coat as a symbol of authority. In variation, experimenter wore every day casual clothes. Obedience decreased to 20% (thee lowest of these variations. Uniforms show legitimacy of authority so we accept that someone with a uniform is entitled to expect obedience.
Milgram situational variables: Location
Baseline study took place at Yale university. The variation took place in a run-down office block instead. Obedience decreased to 47.5% The university showed legitimacy and authority unlike the run down office block. However obedience was still quite high in the office block because participants perceived the ‘scientific’ nature of the procedure
What is the autonomous state?
People direct their own actions and they take responsibility for the results of those actions
What is the agentic state?
Acting as an agent for an authoritative figure and therefore not responsible for personal behaviour. Conformity increases in this state
What did Milgram suggest people must be in place to be in the agentic state?
The person giving the orders is perceived as being qualified to direct other people’s behavior. That is, they are seen as legitimate. The person being ordered about is able to believe that the authority will accept responsibility for what happens.
Hofling (1966) research
He wanted to investigate obedience and acting i an agent state in hospitals.
Adorno (1950) dispositional theory
The authoritarian personality:
Elms (1966) evaluation of authoritarian personality
What can be concluded from Elms study on authoritarian personalities?
Obedient people have more of an authoritarian personality than defiant people due to their upbringing for example harsh parenting
Evaluation of F scale
Legitimacy of authority
Societies structured in hierarchical way, people accept authority figures have been allowed to exercise power