Jelicic - Case report
the case
Two groups of men were fist fighting when one of them suddenly grabbed a gun from another and shot a man of the other group in the head
. Frontal lobe damage + coma
. no memory of the crime
friends visited the victim and victim claimed to regain memory of the crome
it is likely that the victim managed to fill the gap in his memory -> this fits well with the notion of source-monitoring errors in people with frontal lobe injury
What does that mean: Memory is reconstructive
events are encoded in an incomplete and fragmentized way
Ribot’s law
some people with amnesia due to traumatic brain injury gradually and spontaneously regain parts of their memory for pre-injury events over time
this does not apply to frontal lobe injury but is restricted to medial temporal lobe injury
Is it possible in people with frontal lobe damage to regain memory?
although some memories for pre-injury events may return in people with frontal lobe injury, it is unlikely that experiences that took place in the moments before the shooting can be recovered
(has to do with the interrupted consolidation process of info from the STM to the LTM)
Is a eyewitness testimonies of victims with frontal lobe damage authentic?
eyewitness memories of victims with brain damage should be treated with caution
recollections of such people may not be authentic
In order to determine the authenticity of their memories, it seems necessary to find out if recollections of victims with frontal lobe injury might have been contaminated by external information
Pseudo-memory
events that are completely fabricated
What is source monitoring?
mechanism that serves as a screening and controlling device for memory at retrieval. It refers to cognitive processes involved in determining the source of memory information (localized in a network comprising the PFC)
How can pseudomemories envolve?
Source monitoring error:When someone mistakes e.g., the narrative of a friend for ones own memory it is a source monitoring error that leads to pseudo memories
Suboptimal inhibition
suboptimal WM function
People with which injury are prone to have pseudomeories
frontal lobe injuries
Which disorder also is likelty to have source monitoring difficulties?
Schizophrenia
Common techniques in pseudo-memory research:
Imagination-inflation paradigm
Post-hoc misinformation paradigm
Semantic relatedness paradigm
Common techniques in pseudo-memory research
Imagination-inflation paradigm
people are asked to fantasize about events that never happened thereby increasing the subjects confidence that the event did take place
Example: A young man is asked to imagine how he, at age 5, was a passenger in a hot air balloon. According to the man’s parents, such an event never took place. After several weeks, he is asked to assign a confidence rating to the following item: “At age 5, I flew as a passenger in a hot air balloon”. It is likely that he will overestimate the probability of the balloon trip compared to items that were not imagined
Common techniques in pseudo-memory research
Post-hoc misinformation paradigm
exposure to (post-hoc) misinformation/subtle suggestions can change the accurate recollection of a specific event (e.g. suggestive interviewing)
Example: a car accident occurs because a car did not stop at a stop sign, the eye witness is asked what happened when the car did not stop at the sign -> high probability that the person will recall the car did not stop at the yield sign
Common techniques in pseudo-memory research
Semantic relatedness paradigm
people are exposed to cues referring to a critical item that is never presented
Example: people are asked to remember related words, such as bed, nap, pillow, and snooze, all of which are associated to a common word sleep which never presented à people will falsely recognize 65-80% of non-presented words à DRM task
What do all these paradigms produce?
source-monitoring problems: participants find it difficult to differentiate between details that they really perceived and details that they only fantasized about
Which brain regionas are activated when attention is paid to a certain stimulus
primary sensory and association cortex
· (e.g. a visual stimulus activates the visual cortex)
What is the role of the medial temporal lobe?
· The medial temporal lobe works as a switchboard linking different brain regions that are active during the encoding of a specific event -> when we want to retrieve this event the medial temporal lobe mobilizes different regions in the sensory and association cortex
What is the role of the PFC?
involved in search strategies and the evaluation of their results -> at retrieval it monitors relevant and inhibits irrelevant information
Role of Left PFC
organizes the encoded information in the most efficient way for later remembering
Role of Right PFC
guides retrieval (possibly especially for autobiographical memories)
What happens to memories when the PFC is demaged?
memory distortions -> decreased usage of strategic retrieval and control (e.g., monitoring, evaluation, inhibition) leading to an endorsement of irrelevant memory representations during retrieval of a specific event
How is AGE related to recognition errors?
Neurologically intact elderly make more false recognition errors than younger adults
Older adults are less successful in reproducing studied items and more often falsely recall the non-presented words
: only older adults with poor frontal lobe functioning show heightened levels of false recollections
Older people are more susceptible to misinformation