Pre-9/11 status of terrorism coverage
insurers did NOT exclude or charge separately for terrorism coverage
Post-9/11 status of terrorism coverage
insurers and reinsurers withdrew coverage (due to lack of credible data and potentially catastrophic losses)
Motivation for gov’t involvement in terrorism coverage (TRIA) (3)
Goals of TRIA
How goal 1 is accomplished (stability)
TRIA created a gov’t-backed loss-sharing mechanism
How goal 2 is accomplished (consumer protection)
How goal 3 is accomplished (preserve state regulation)
-TRIA explicity preserves state insurance commissioner’s powers
- but with certain exceptions: the state can’t enact its own definition of terrorism
Loss sharing criteria in TRIA legislation (7)
How TRIA treats loss-sharing for small losses
covered by private insurance (aggregate industry losses <= 200m)
How TRIA treats loss-sharing for medium losses
federal gov’t provides loans to insurers (but spreads repayment across time and industry with future premium surcharges)
How TRIA treat loss-sharing for large losses
federal gov’t covers most of the loss without recoupment (aggregate industry losses between 37.5b and 100b)
Who administers TRIA
Federal Insurance Office (FIO under Dodd-Frank) assists Secretary of the Treasury
Is NBCR terrorism covered under TRIA (Nuclear, Biological, Chemical, Radiological)
Is cyber-terrorism covered under TRIA
Yes but only 50% of standalone cyber insurance policies included terrorism
Terrorism coverage in other countries (4)
Spain: gov’t owned reinsurer that has provided coverage for catastrophes since 1954
UK: privately owned mutual insurance company with gov’t backing (Pool Re)
Germany: private insurer with government backing
Canada: considered, but rejected, creating a gov’t program following 9/11
Partial solution to lack of terrorism data
use models in place of actual data (similar to hurricane models)