Extinction is __________, acquisition isnt
context specific
basic explanation of extinction
when we present CS- (cs aloe) after acquisition training, we should see decline in responding
- responding fist increases during acquisition
-responding starts high then declines in extinction
does the extinction of responding in extinction signal that the original acquisition/association is unlearnt, or is new learning masking the retrieval of that memory/association?
it is not unlearning; its new learning that makes memory of association
can extinction lead to different emotional repsonses?
Excitation procedure reduces———— and increases ————
conditioned repsosning to near baseline; increases behavioural variability
applied significance of extinction
in clinical settings; phobias, addiction, ptsd, depression
Each can have stim that serve as triggers for maladaptive behaviours
So clinical uses of exticntion in order to attempt to try and understand how triggering stim can lose triggering effects
Target of therapy is IDing enviro events that lead to maladaptive, unwanted behavior
3 signature phenomena of extinction
spontaneous recovery
renewal
reinstatement
extinction: sponteanous recovery
Acquisition then extinction; then wait for passage of time; after time, return in conditoned reposnse
- shows Extinction doesn’t completely eradicate original learning
Animals have retained both acquisition and extinction memory
extinction; sponteansou recovery(study)
by rescorla
rats trained to magazine appears; CS-US pairings
- S1 group presented with CS- immediately after acquisition
- S2 present with CS- after 7 days
- the diff between S1 and S2 in reposting reflects spontaneous recovery; after passage of time, S1 responding recovered, while s2 didn’t
extinction renewal effect
return in conditioend response after change in context
context
basic one is called ABA renewal, also ABC
extinction; renewal (ABA)
context A; acquisition of CS-US assoc; pairing context
context B: extinction, CS-
contra A v B; test CS- in context A and B and see if CR returns in either
results is animals respond more in context A than B bc A serves as an occasion setter for acquisition
Boution ABA renewal study
context a; aquisitoon, rats learn how to press lever for food
context b; exctiniton
both an instrumental assoc b/n lever press and food ad pavlovian assoc b/n context a and food
CR will return if animal is tested in the acquisition context
renewal ABC design and study
Context a; CS-US pairing/acquisition
Cntext b; CS-; extinction
Context C; CS- test in novel context
westbrook harris study; same group=ABB
diff group= ABC
diff between group same and diff rep ABC renewal effect; ansials show more CR in C than in B
reinstatement effect
iordanova study; 4 groups(PR, PN, UR, UN)
- during aquisiton phase, PR PN get CS+, UR UN get CS/+
- extinction; all animals put on context A, get CS-; extinction for the paired animals
- reinstatement; all put in context A; PR and UR (reinstate grps) get US-, UN PN get nothing
- in test, CS- presented; PR animals, after exposure to just paired US alone, leads to returnof CR to the CS
Unsignalled exmposure to US in reinstatement (US alone) leads to return in CR to the CS
factors that effect extinction
factors affecting exciting; compounding extinction stimuli
study by rescorla
During asqusiiton 3 diff stim L, X, and Y (all reinforced separate)
Phase 2; element extinction; each stimulus exposed to CS-
Phase 3; compound extinction phase; Y exposed on its own to CS-, LX exposed as compound to CS-
test phase; test X and Y and comp their CR; responding to X is lower than t Y; stim that undergoes CS- as compound gets deeper extinction
extcitnion; paradoxical effecst
magnitude of reward affects extinction
partial reinforcement extinction effect
why does partial reinforcement extinction effect (pree) occur (2 explanations)
SS and SR ascoitoans
SS; b/n 2 stim, first order cond
SR; b/n stima nd response
2nd order cond
present light and shock (CS+)
then light and tone
both SS and SR could form
extinguish light and tone i
if its SS, exintgitoning light will lead to little fear tot he tone
if tone becomes associated with CR, then extinguishing light won’t change anything
so if data stays same, its SR not SS
pavlov 1st order cond; US devaluation
in exp grp; after food then pairings, rats get food then induced sickness
control group rest more to tone than the exp group, bc its a SS association not SR
pavlov 2nd order cond; US devaluation
first light paired with food, then tone paired with light, then exp group is given food and induced sick, cont gap given just sickness
tested with just tone; rest to tone in 2nd order cond bc its SR
multiple associations ; borbit and balleine study (pavlov to instrumental transfer)
S1 and s2 and s3 paired with different outcome s; s1 and outcome 1, etc
then transfer test; 2 levers, and either S1, S2, or S3 would come on; animals more likely to press lever associated with outcome paired to stim (ie press lever for O2 if S2)
more responding to same/congruent (ie rest more on R2 when S2)
testing for pail;ocv to instrumental transfer; general/effective v sensory/specific properties
Then they tested this with lesions to BLA and CN
- when BLA disrupted, genealogy remained fien, but sensory was impacted; so BLA integral for sensory/specific
- when CN disrupted, sensory/specifbc is fine, but general is impacted