`How hard is it to entrench the UK constitution - fixed term parliaments act?
After the 2010 new coalition government wished to change the UK constition to introduce the fixed terms parliament act it proposed a law stating that each new should sit for a fixed 5 year term before the next general election - the fixed term parliament act 2011 took away the unwritten convention that the monarch, following a request by the PM, had the power to dissolve parliament and call a general election. it was intended that this law would be permanent so that every new parliament would have life for 5 years but it is not possible to entrench laws in the UK
Then in 2022 under the dissolution and calling of parliament act - it repelled the fixed terms parliament act and formally declared that the power to be to dissolve parliament and call a general election would return to the original convention of the monarch under the advice from the PM choosing the moment to call a general election without having to wait 5 years
This demonstrates the lack of entrenchment of conditional reforms as well as showing how a convention as the practice was before 2011 can become part of written law as the power of the monarch to choose when an election is called is now statue law
The 2011 law was supposed to be permanent
But it was easily repealed in 2022
👉 This proves UK laws are not entrenched
Conventions can become law
Before 2011: election timing was based on convention
In 2022: that same idea was written into statute
👉 So:
Something that was once just a tradition is now part of written law as before 2011 the Monarch would normally take the PMs advice and then when the power got given back to the monarch it is the same but it is now a law saying the monarch has to listen the the PMs voice
How hard is it to entrench the UK constitution - use of referendums?
It has been popular to hold referendums when connotational change is proposed in order to add popular support to a decision and make it more politically challenging for a future government to revoke it so they are politically trying to entrench it via the support of the people
This was done for the devolution of power to Scotland and Wales in 1997 and the introduction of mayors in London + other areas and to approve the good Friday agreement in 1998 and on UK membership of the EU in 2016
Where a referendum has produced a “NO” result like the AV electoral system change in 2011 and the Scottish independence referendum in 2014 a constitional change cannot realistically take place as it has no public backing, but the effect of other referendums is to entrench constitional developments as it is inconvincible that changes would be reversed without another referndums to approve reversal - thus the uk is moving gradually towards a system of entrenchment through referendums
What happens if people vote “YES”?
If people vote YES, the change usually sticks
👉 Why?
It would be politically very hard for a future government to undo it
Reversing it would likely require another referendum
So even though Parliament can legally change anything…
👉 In reality:
They are unlikely to go against the will of the people
The UK uses referendums to give constitutional changes public support, making them politically difficult to reverse -even though they are not legally entrenched.
How hard is it to entrench the UK constitution - unitary?
In a unitary constitution, political power is centred in one place and all over bodies are inferior to that one whereas a federal body divides power between both the central body and regional bodies like the USA and Germany so different laws for different states
Traditionally and it still does just about remain true the UK is a unitary systems as west minster holds the central power of sovereignty - however devolution which is the handing over of power can easily be returned or reclaimed and has created an unusual system which the UK arguable is which is a semi-federal system
As legally parliament could choose to return sovereignty to Westminster and end devolution, but politically this would be very unpopular and unlikely to happen
What is a constitution?
A set of rules determining where sovereignty lies in a political system and establishing the relationship between the government and the governed
What is a codified constitution?
A constitution that is written in one single document - USA
What is an uncodified constitution?
A constitution where everything is not contained or written in a single document
What is parliamentary sovereignty?
The principle that parliament can make amend or unmake any law and cannot bind its succesor nor be bound by it’s predecessors - they can do what they like
What is a link with consiitutional rights?
They are a key element of democratic protections within the uk and they also define the relationship between the different branches of government
Should constitutions be amended from time to time and how can the UK constitution be changed ?
Yes - the UK can be changed by:
What is unquie about the UK consitions ammendment process compaired to france?
France has to hold a referendum for an amendment but the UK has no higher higher methods of amendments and the constitution has evolved over history and can be amended quickly this to some extent is an unseen process that is subtle as it doesn’t concern much or the public
What did the Magna carta 1215 do?
It established the rule of law should apply and the monarch should operate within this framework of law
What did the Bill of rights 1689?
This act of parliament made sure the monarchs at the time didn’t exceed their powers and stated parliament was sovereign and has the final say on areas like government finances
What did the parliaments act 1911 and 1949 do?
Settled the relationship between the HOC and the HOL before the 1911 act each chamber was at equal status but after the 1911 the HOL lost it’s power to regulate public finances and could only delay legislation for 2 years so could no longer VETO legislation for good - the 1949 act reduced that delay period from 2 to 1 year so the HOC is now very much the senior house
What did the European committees act 1972 do?
Brought the UK into which then became the EU they only joined in 1973 through
European withdrawal act 2017?
Gave parliament consent to leave the EU
What key things are needed for a codified constitution?
Must be contained in one document
It must of been written at one point in history so in one source even if it has been emended
Has to be clear between constitutional and non constitutional laws
Positives of a uncodified system?
It is more flexible so the political system can be more responsive to changing attitudes and ideas so it can be updated more compared to a codified one
No build up of public pressure without the need for major uprising or revolutionary action
The Dunblane massacre 1997 the Uk was very easily and quickly able to introduce gun regulations due to the school attack compared to the US who have the inability to impose gun laws despite a large amount of people wanting them
Negatives of an uncodified system?
Less effective at protecting rights as laws can be easily changed - unlike the ECHR which is a well written and known document harder to change
With the uk constitution if you changed gun rights to speech rights the UK government could easily change the the right to free speech however the US cant no matter how much they want to as it is a hard process to change
What does entrenchment mean?
It means constitutional rules are very well protected and difficult to change usually needing a super majority of the government to change
Why can the constitution not be entrenched in the UK?
Because parliament is sovereign not the constitution this means every new poarilemnt can edit the constituion as it wishes
How does parliament edit the constituion?
Pass a parliamentary statue and there is no higher standard for constitutional law
What is an example of a constituional change in realtion to HR and the HOC?
The UK gov is normally able to dominate parliament by using the majority in the HOC meaning it can effectively control the consitiution
This was seen when the UK parliament passed the Human righst act in 1998 this encorprated the ECHR into UK law
It became binding on all poltical bodies other than parilaemnt no special procedures were needed and a fundamental change of the UK constitution was made through a simple act of parliament
Evidence there are few ways of limiting parliaments power?
When the UK left the EU parilemnt rgained soem powers it lended over to the EU gaining back more soverginty but it has also lended powers and soverginty to devloved bodies and also mayors
What are the 4 types of sovereignty ?
Politcal
Legal
Popular
Pooled