Theft Flashcards

(50 cards)

1
Q

Where is the definition of theft given?

A

S1-7 theft act 1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does the 1968 theft act state?

A

A person is guilty of theft if his dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention to permanently deprive the other of it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the actus reus of theft?

A

Appropriation s3
Property s4
Belonging to another s5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the mens Rea of theft

A

Dishonestly s2
Intention to permanently deprive s6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the maximum penalty under the theft act?

A

7 years in prison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does s3 TA 1968 State about appropriation

A

Any assumption by a person of the rights of an owner amounts to an appropriation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Pitham and Hehl

A

D looked after his friend’s Group A’s house and tried to sell furniture to Group B, but never actually went through.

Taken as appropriation as it does not have to be all rights of owner, only one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does the case of Lawrence say about theft (legal principle only)

A

An owner has the right to destroy, damage, lend and sell. If anyone else assumes those rights it would be considered theft.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happened in the case of Lawrence

A

Italian student got a taxi in the UK, & he spoke little English. Journey should have cost 50p, driver said more, student offered £1, driver said not enough and took another £6

Consent did not matter here as student was unaware of rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What happened in the case of morris?

A

D switched price labels of two items to pay a lower price, didnt go through checkout. Ruled the appropriation of switching labels was enough rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happened in the case of R V Gomez

A

D was assistant manager and persuaded manager to sell goods worth £17,00+ and accept 2 checks. Checks were stolen and had no value
There was appropriation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Does there need to be a ‘taking’ of property to constitute appropriation

A

No (Gomez)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What principle did the case of Hinks establish?

A

Accepting a gift from a vulnerable and trusting person amounts to appropriation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What happened in the case of R v Hinks

A

D was a carer for a gullible old man with Low IQ, encouraged him to give her gifts, acquired £60,000 and a tv set

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Under s4 of TA 1968 what does property include?

A

Money and all other property, real and personal including things in action and other intangible property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does R v welsh constitute as property?

A

A urine sample

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What does R V Kelly count as property?

A

Body parts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What does r v (Michael) smith view as property?

A

Prohibited drugs can be stolen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is tangible property

A

Things that can be touched

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is intangible property

A

Property that can’t be touched? E.g copyright

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are things in action?

A

A kind of intangible property? E.g bank account or check

22
Q

Oxford v moss

A

Ruled information can’t be stolen as the contents dont change when handed back,

Done after a uni student found the examination paper, read it and returned it

23
Q

Property in relation to wild flowers and and animals

A

S4(3) you can pick mushrooms and flowers when wild as long as not for commercial purposes

And its not theft to capture an untamed or non captive animal

24
Q

Under s5(1) of the TA act what is the term belonging to another

A

Property shall be regarded as belonging to any person having possession or control of it, or having it in any proprietary right or interest

25
What point does R V Turner illustrate
D stole his own car from a garage without paying for the services Showing belonging to doesn’t just apply to the actual owner but also temporary possessions
26
Davidge v Bunnet
This applies to when you’re given money to use it for a particular reason. D was given money by flat sharers to pay gas bill but bought presents
27
Name another case in which money has been misleadingly used
R v wain, when using charity gained money for personal issues
28
What happens if someone receives money by mistake?
Are obligated to return, even if a worker is overpaid
29
AG Reference
Where a police woman was overpaid by employer and found guilty as court held awareness of overpayment and failure to return is theft.
30
R v gilks
If a person fails to return property to rightful owner he will be seen as depriving and intending to deprive the owner D betted on a horse and was mistakenly paid £100, not guilty as gambling transactions are non enforceable
31
What happens if property is lost or abandoned
Stops being property once abandoned so can’t be theft
32
Ricketts v basildon 2010
Held that goods left outside a charity shop weren’t abandoned and remained in position of whoever deposited until taken by charity
33
Though Parliament hasn’t provided a clear definition of dishonesty, which situations have they provided dishonesty will exist in?
-if the property is taken with a view to help others it can still amount to theft -possible to be dishonest even if willing to pay for property
34
Where has the theft act 1968 outlined the appropriation of property is NOT dishonest?
Where the D believes he has the lawful right to deprive the other of it Where the D believes the V would have given consent Where the D believes the property whom it belongs to can’t be discovered by taking reasonable steps
35
What cases has a person believed he had the right to property?
Holden R v small
36
What happened in the case of Holden
D worked at Kwik fit and used some tires, convicted of theft but he appealed saying he wasnt dishonest as others did the same Despite the contract stating that this was forbidden, the conviction was still quashed as the dishonesty was subjective to the D
37
What happened in the case of R v small
D noticed and abandoned car with keys in ignition, filled up tank and drove away. This was taken as honest behaviour
38
What is the test for dishonesty?
Previously gosh test but now Ivey test
39
What happened in Ivey v genting casino?
D was a poker player who won £7.7 mil using cheats, despite entering a contract with no cheating Established the Ivey test for only civil law
40
What happened in the case of R V Booth and Barton
D targeted wealthy residents in a care home for over 20 years and manipulated them into gaining £4,000,000 from wills etc. This made Ivery standard in criminal law too, D found guilty
41
What is the Ivey test
If D’s conduct is dishonest by standards of ordinary decent people If this is true, conduct is dishonest
42
What does S6(1) state about intention to permanently deprive
Even if the defendant does not want the V to lose the property, it can still be theft if D’s intention is to treat the thing as his own to dispose of, regardless of the others rights. Including borrowing and lending. Must have intent at same time as appropriation
43
Where are cases where the D intends to return the property from the beginning but is still theft?
Velumyl R v Raphael
44
What happened in the case of Velumyl
The D took £1050 from the safe of a company he worked for, he argued it was only temporary COA upheld conviction as the banknotes wouldn’t be the same
45
What happened in the case of R V Raphael?
Two D’s took V’s car forcefully and tried to sell it back to him, convicted as they treated the car as their own by selling it
46
What happened in the case of DPP V Lavander
Interpreted the section: intending to treat the property as your own to dispose of, regardless of the other’s rights D took doors from a council property being repaired and gave it to his girlfriend in the same council D treated them as his own= theft
47
What does R V Lloyds and others say on borrowing
Borrowing will only amount to intention to permanently deprive if use or duration make it equivalent to taking or disposal D was a cinema projectionist who allowed his friend to copy the films he borrowed, as there was no decline in value upon return, it was not theft
48
What is conditional intention?
Where the d attempts to steal but realises there’s nothing of worth in a bag etc and leaves
49
What happened in the case of Eason?
D rummaged through a hand bag and didnt take anything, conviction quashed
50
What happened in the case of AG reference no1 & 2 in regards to conditional intent
It would now amount to attempted theft/burglary